:PROPERTIES:
:ID:       c2d3e4f5-a6b7-8901-2cde-f01234567890
:CREATED:  [2026-05-25 Mon]
:END:
#+title: Phase 2
#+filetags: :passepartout:strategy:adoption:impact:

Phase 2 spans 10⁴ to 10⁶ users. The protocol's economic weight becomes
measurable. See the [[id:92ccd074-04a0-4e45-a44f-9da24ea20a9b][Impact]] overview for context.

**Verification:** First regulator encode makes adoption mandatory in a
domain. Cloud revenue decelerates as Lisp machines replace racks of x86
servers. Compliance industry sees 30-50% paper audit reduction.
Insurance differentiates on verification — actuarial wedge forms.

**Social protocol:** Contract marketplace reaches critical mass.
Freelancers and cross-border workers use the protocol for verifiable
contracts and escrow, bypassing Upwork's 20% fee and jurisdictional
legal uncertainty. The reputation graph from Phase 0-1 communities now
carries real economic weight — a proven history of verified transactions
is more valuable than any platform's rating system. Cross-jurisdiction
transactions execute with no reference to any state's legal system.

**Impact on platforms:** The unbundling accelerates. Stripe loses
payment volume in protocol communities — Lightning is free, Stripe takes
2.9% + $0.30. DocuSign loses contract volume — SCAL contracts are
native to the protocol, not a separate subscription. Upwork and Fiverr
lose freelancers who bypass the platform fee by contracting directly
through the protocol. Discord loses communities that migrate to
cryptographically owned Social Spaces. These are not competitive
responses the incumbents can match — Stripe cannot offer social and
contracts, Discord cannot offer zero-fee payments and portable identity.

**Financial services:**

*Insurance differentiation — the actuarial wedge:*

This is the first structural impact on a core financial service.
Insurers who adopt verification (using gate logs for underwriting)
develop a pricing advantage over insurers who rely on self-reported data.
The wedge works as follows:

- A verified insurer attests property condition, security system status,
  driver behaviour, or inventory integrity through gate logs. The data
  is cryptographically proven and cannot be fabricated.
- An unverified insurer relies on customer statements, paper forms, and
  spot audits. Their data is noisy and expensive to collect.
- The verified insurer prices 15-30% lower because their risk model is
  better. Policyholders migrate. The unverified insurer bleeds
  low-risk customers and is left with a riskier pool — classic adverse
  selection in reverse.
- At scale, the wedge widens as the verified insurer accumulates more
  data and refines their gate rules. After 2-3 years, the unverified
  insurer cannot compete on price without adopting verification
  themselves.

This is not a regulatory mandate — it is a competitive dynamic that
drives adoption without requiring a regulator to act. Insurance
differentiation is the most organically potent force for verification
adoption in the financial sector at this phase.

*Mutual insurance — first social protocol pools:*

Phase 2 is where the first mutual insurance pools form on the social
protocol. These are small-scale, community-level arrangements, but
they demonstrate the structural difference the protocol enables.

The three problems that have always limited mutual insurance:

1. **Adverse selection** — high-risk members join, low-risk members
   leave, the pool collapses.
2. **Fraud** — members claim for events that did not happen or inflate
   losses.
3. **Governance overhead** — someone must collect contributions, verify
   claims, manage reserves. This either costs money (killing small-pool
   economics) or concentrates power (creating insider risk).

The protocol addresses all three at the architecture level:

- **Adverse selection:** The pool queries the reputation graph — how
  long has a member's DID existed, how many contracts have they
  fulfilled, have they been party to an arbitration dispute? A newcomer
  with a fresh DID and no history pays higher contributions until they
  have enough verified history for standard rates. This mirrors social
  insurance where community members vouch for each other, except the
  vouching is verifiable.
- **Fraud:** A claim requires a gate attestation. For some events this
  is direct (a weather oracle attests to flood damage in a postal code).
  For others it requires social attestation (two pool members with
  verified DIDs attest they witnessed the damage). Any fraud requires
  collusion across multiple verified identities, each of whom loses
  reputation if detected. The cost of successful fraud exceeds the
  benefit for most cases.
- **Governance:** The pool is a Collective Persona. Contributions are
  automatic on schedule. Payouts execute automatically when a claim
  gate rule passes. The reserve balance is transparent on the proof
  log. Disputes go to the protocol's arbitration guilds. Overhead drops
  from "hire a part-time administrator" to "define the contribution
  and claim rules once."

At Phase 2, mutual pools are small — neighbourhood risk-sharing
(appliance failure, minor medical bills, income disruption), hobbyist
guilds (equipment damage for a shared workshop), or community groups
(shared liability for a community garden or event). Members know each
other socially, which is a strong check on adverse selection and fraud
independently of the protocol. The protocol handles the mechanics that
would otherwise require a treasurer and a spreadsheet.

These pools would never be economical as conventional insurance products
— the premium is too small to justify administrative cost. The protocol
makes them viable because the marginal cost of running a pool is near
zero once the gate rules are defined. This is the first demonstration
that the protocol enables risk-sharing arrangements that the market
cannot serve.

*Cross-border payments:*

The contract marketplace enables a new kind of cross-border payment. A
worker in Kenya receives payment as a Lightning transaction through a
protocol contract. The employer in Germany sends euros; the contract
executes a currency conversion gate rule and delivers satoshis to the
worker's DID. The cost is near-zero. The settlement is instant. The
worker needs no bank account, no remittance service, no Western Union.
This is Phase 2 because it requires the contract marketplace to have
critical mass, which it reaches at this phase.

**Governance and law — first hints:**

The arbitration guilds that handle contract marketplace disputes are the
first proto-legal institution built on the protocol. A dispute between a
freelancer in Nigeria and a client in Germany goes to a guild rather
than to either country's courts. The guild's jurisdiction is neither
territorial nor contractual in the conventional sense — it is consented
to by both parties through the contract's arbitration clause. The guild
applies its own procedural rules, renders a decision, and the escrow
gate executes the outcome automatically.

This is a new legal phenomenon: private law that is both trans-
jurisdictional and self-executing. No state court enforces the guild's
judgment — the protocol does. The guild's legitimacy comes from its
reputation on the protocol, not from a state's delegation of authority.
At Phase 2, this is limited to small-value commercial disputes, but
the structural precedent is set.

Separately, the first dissident communities and opposition organizers in
authoritarian regimes begin using the protocol for secure coordination.
The repression they face is the first evidence that the protocol's
censorship resistance is a political fact, not a technical curiosity.
These early political users are invisible to most of the protocol's
user base, but they matter disproportionately to the long-term
trajectory — they create a use case that no consumer application can
match and no government can tolerate.

**Economics:**

On the destruction side: cloud revenue deceleration in regulated
markets, compliance industry revenue loss ($60-100B of the $200B market
affected), early platform revenue loss at Stripe, DocuSign, and Upwork.
On the creation side: contract marketplace fees ($20-100M), gate rule
consulting, insurance differentiation revenue. Capital begins
reallocating from intermediation to infrastructure.
