Architecture reframe: rename triad/Stoa/Logos/Agora → Passepartout

- Renamed ideas/stoa/ → ideas/passepartout/, all stage files prefixed passepartout-
- Renamed triad-index/overview/systemic-effects → passepartout-* under passepartout/
- Renamed ideas/agora/ → ideas/passepartout-social-protocol/, stripped agora- prefixes
- Merged overview and environment pages into architecture; deleted 3 redundant files
- Renamed growth-strategy → enterprise-growth-strategy
- Renamed alternative-growth-social-first → social-growth-strategy
- Removed all Greek names: Stoa, Logos, Agora as product names
- Updated 50+ files of cross-references to new naming
- Kept org-id UUIDs intact throughout
This commit is contained in:
Hermes
2026-05-24 18:02:36 +00:00
parent cc3976fb7f
commit 2578bfee61
61 changed files with 859 additions and 927 deletions

View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ divides into three categories:
None of the nine compete with Passepartout on all axes simultaneously. Passepartout's
strongest differentiators — Org-mode data model, deterministic gate stack, ACL2
verification, Merkle-treed memory, and the triad architecture — are absent from
verification, Merkle-treed memory, and the Passepartout architecture — are absent from
every competitor.
* Category 1: Coding Agents
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ every competitor.
| Cognitive architecture | 10-80-10 symbolic-first (planned) | 100% LLM (every competitor) | Post-flip, Passepartout uses ~10% of the tokens competitors use. |
| Data format | Org-mode (human-editable, machine-parseable, single file) | JSONL/Markdown/YAML/DB (competitors use 2-5 formats) | Unified format reduces translation layers to zero. |
| Self-modification | Type-level gates + hot-reload | Claude Code (skills), Hermes (skills) | Passepartout's guard against self-modification is structural (type level), not heuristic (pattern list). |
| Triad | Passepartout + [[id:c3b3dc41-945f-54e9-84eb-ca014114f1be][Stoa]] + [[id:1d074690-a279-59cb-b91d-e9a22ae104ad][Agora]] | None | No competitor is building a full computing stack + social network. |
| Architecture | Passepartout ([[id:c3b3dc41-945f-54e9-84eb-ca014114f1be][environment subsystem]] + [[id:1d074690-a279-59cb-b91d-e9a22ae104ad][social protocol]]) | None | No competitor is building a full computing stack + social network. |
| Provider independence | Any OpenAI-compatible API | Hermes (109+), Gemini CLI (1 primary) | Comparable to Hermes, better than most. |
* Where Competitors Lead
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ Passepartout optimizes for:
- Cognitive architecture (10-80-10 symbolic-first)
- Safety by construction (type-level gates)
- Unified data model (Org-mode as everything)
- Network effects (Agora)
- Full-stack ownership (Stoa)
- Network effects (social protocol)
- Full-stack ownership (environment subsystem)
These are not axes any competitor cares about. The risk is not that a competitor
builds a better Passepartout — it's that the market never develops a preference