Architecture reframe: rename triad/Stoa/Logos/Agora → Passepartout

- Renamed ideas/stoa/ → ideas/passepartout/, all stage files prefixed passepartout-
- Renamed triad-index/overview/systemic-effects → passepartout-* under passepartout/
- Renamed ideas/agora/ → ideas/passepartout-social-protocol/, stripped agora- prefixes
- Merged overview and environment pages into architecture; deleted 3 redundant files
- Renamed growth-strategy → enterprise-growth-strategy
- Renamed alternative-growth-social-first → social-growth-strategy
- Removed all Greek names: Stoa, Logos, Agora as product names
- Updated 50+ files of cross-references to new naming
- Kept org-id UUIDs intact throughout
This commit is contained in:
Hermes
2026-05-24 18:02:36 +00:00
parent cc3976fb7f
commit 2578bfee61
61 changed files with 859 additions and 927 deletions

View File

@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ Run on Linux, use C libraries through CFFI, deliver value without replacing the
| Component | Lines | Method | Scale |
|----------+-------+--------+-------|
| Neurosymbolic core (ACL2 + Screamer + LLM bridge) | ~4,500 | Agent-generated Lisp, human-validated | Weeks — dense, well-bounded, proven approach |
| Terminal-based [[id:c3b3dc41-945f-54e9-84eb-ca014114f1be][Stoa]] (editor + REPL + shell) | ~2,000 | CL-charms / cl-tty | Weeks — TUI patterns established |
| Terminal-based [[id:c3b3dc41-945f-54e9-84eb-ca014114f1be][environment subsystem]] (editor + REPL + shell) | ~2,000 | CL-charms / cl-tty | Weeks — TUI patterns established |
| Gate rule SDK + marketplace | ~1,500 | ACL2 gate packages | Weeks — pure symbolic, well-specified |
| CFFI wrappers (system, GPU, crypto, storage) | ~2,000 | Thin bindings | Days — mechanical translation |
| [[id:84a537b4-4256-50c8-91f5-dd5b4538418f][Verification appliance]] CLI + [[id:1d074690-a279-59cb-b91d-e9a22ae104ad][Agora]] namespace | ~1,000 | API surface | Weeks |
| [[id:84a537b4-4256-50c8-91f5-dd5b4538418f][Verification appliance]] CLI + [[id:1d074690-a279-59cb-b91d-e9a22ae104ad][social protocol]] namespace | ~1,000 | API surface | Weeks |
*Total MVP: ~11,000 lines. Timeline: 1-3 months. Human review: ~20 hours.*
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Replace Linux, replace C libraries, own the framebuffer, own the browser. This i
| Browser (WebKit embed) | WebKit via Lisp FFI with verified wrappers | ~3,000 | Months — sandboxing the embed | Web platform surface is unbounded |
| Native browser | Full Lisp DOM + render engine | ~30,000+ | Years — browser engines are OS-scale | This is the hardest piece. Consider staying on WebKit |
| Core libraries (libc, SSL, crypto, etc.) | Incremental verified replacements | ~10,000+ | Years — can chip away post-ship | Every replacement must match SOTA perf |
| Qt / terminal / native UI toolkit | Stoa toolkit (verified compositor + widgets) | ~8,000 | Monthsyears | UX parity with modern toolkits is the highest risk |
| Qt / terminal / native UI toolkit | Environment toolkit (verified compositor + widgets) | ~8,000 | Monthsyears | UX parity with modern toolkits is the highest risk |
*Ballpark end state: 25,000-60,000 lines. Timeline: 2-5 years.*
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ The range reflects uncertainty about the browser. If WebKit embed is sufficient
|---------+---------+-----------+----------------------|
| Does the verification marketplace work? | Company thesis | Months (Phase Zero) | Solved in days |
| Can we ship without replacing Linux? | Time-to-market | Weeks to implement | Years of kernel work before product |
| Is WebKit embed enough for Stoa? | 60% of total timeline | Months vs years | Native browser as default path |
| Is WebKit embed enough for the environment subsystem? | 60% of total timeline | Months vs years | Native browser as default path |
| Does the sufficiency flip cover each domain? | Revenue model | Weeks per domain | One-shot, all or nothing |
| Can Lisp match SOTA browser UX? | Full vision | Generations (or never) | Engineering problem, not a research question |