Remove versioned roadmap from Passepartout docs

All version numbers stripped from roadmap across all brain documents:
- passepartout-economics.org: v0.x.x version table → phase-name-only table,
  v1.0.0 → 'neurosymbolic maturity', versioned text references → capability
  descriptions. Retained phase names (Phase 0-7) and line estimates as they
  describe capabilities, not version milestones.
- competitive-analysis-2026-05.org: version references removed
- time-estimates.org: v0.4.0 → 'initial state', v1.0.0 → 'neurosymbolic maturity'
- native-org-knowledge-base.org: v0.8.0-v0.9.0 → capability-based target

ideas/competitive-analysis-2026-05.org

@@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ gate system without an agent to gate.
 | Channel/platform support | OpenClaw (25+ channels) | TUI only — no multi-channel |
 | Plugin ecosystem | OpenClaw (ClawHub, npm registry) | No plugin marketplace |
 | Subagent delegation | Claude Code (fork with context inheritance) | Planned via Screamer planner |
-| Codebase size / features shipped | All competitors have working products | v0.7.2 in development |
-| MCP integration | Hermes, Codex (native), Continue | Planned v0.53.0 |
+| Codebase size / features shipped | All competitors have working products | In development |
+| MCP integration | Hermes, Codex (native), Continue | Planned |
 | Sandboxing | Codex CLI (Seatbelt+nsjail), Gemini CLI (6 methods) | None |
 | Business model | Hermes (MIT+services), Codex (tokens) | AGPL + appliances + SaaS |
 | Cross-platform | Claude Code (macOS/*nix), Codex (macOS) | Linux only |
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ exist yet.
 
 1. Claude Code's safety system is the benchmark to exceed. The type-level gate
    architecture is theoretically superior to Claude Code's heuristic patterns,
-   but the implementation at v0.11.0 needs to prove it catches things Claude Code
+   but the implementation needs to prove it catches things Claude Code
    misses.
 
 2. No competitor has anything resembling a neurosymbolic architecture. The 10-80-10