Fix Untitled titles: convert all YAML frontmatter to org-style headers
This commit is contained in:
Hermes
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-05-11 Mon]
|
||||
:ID: e66a5d5f-70ff-4953-93c3-569e05eaff73
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
#+title: Validation
|
||||
* Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- [[file:whiteheads-process-philosophy-and-type-theory.org][Whitehead's Process Philosophy and Type Theory]] — Alfred North Whitehead's two major bodies of work — /Principia Mathematica/ (191
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,14 +1,9 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Gaur & Sheth (2023): CREST — Trustworthy Neurosymbolic AI
|
||||
type: reference
|
||||
tags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-05-11 Mon]
|
||||
:ID: ec267c73-4e0d-4efb-9497-cb72f74538e4
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
* Gaur & Sheth (2023): CREST — Trustworthy Neurosymbolic AI
|
||||
#+title: Gaur & Sheth (2023): CREST — Trustworthy Neurosymbolic AI
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
Gaur and Sheth present the CREST framework: Consistency, Reliability, user-level Explainability, and Safety build Trust — and they argue these require neurosymbolic methods. Their empirical finding: GPT-3.5 breached safety constraints 30% of the time when asked identical questions repeatedly. Claude's 16 safety rules and Sparrow's 23 rules provide no /inherent/ safety — they are heuristic guardrails that can be breached through prompt variation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,8 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Historical Lineage — McCarthy's Advice Taker
|
||||
type: reference
|
||||
tags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
* Historical Lineage — McCarthy's Advice Taker
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:ID: 3d25a808-d623-42fb-a054-15fb28cd464b
|
||||
:ID: design-mccarthy
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-05-10 Sun]
|
||||
:WEIGHT: 40
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-06-04 Thu]
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
#+title: Historical Lineage — McCarthy's Advice Taker
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
McCarthy's "Programs with Common Sense" (1959) is the direct intellectual ancestor of the Passepartout architecture. The paper proposed an "advice taker" — a program that "will draw immediate conclusions from a list of premises" expressed in "a suitable formal language (most likely a part of the predicate calculus)." The program would:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,14 +1,9 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Marcus (2020): The Case Against Pure Deep Learning
|
||||
type: reference
|
||||
tags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-05-11 Mon]
|
||||
:ID: 4c65fdbb-a45c-4c71-ac29-6488e9271f4a
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
* Marcus (2020): The Case Against Pure Deep Learning
|
||||
#+title: Marcus (2020): The Case Against Pure Deep Learning
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
Gary Marcus's "The Next Decade in AI" argues that deep learning alone is "data hungry, shallow, brittle, and limited in its ability to generalize." The paper demonstrates GPT-2 failing at basic commonsense reasoning:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,14 +1,9 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Sheth et al. (2022): Knowledge-Infused Learning
|
||||
type: reference
|
||||
tags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-05-11 Mon]
|
||||
:ID: a56c8e07-9e5b-4070-a0f9-280188ccd6b7
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
* Sheth et al. (2022): Knowledge-Infused Learning
|
||||
#+title: Sheth et al. (2022): Knowledge-Infused Learning
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
Sheth, Gunaratna, Bhatt, and Gaur define Knowledge-infused Learning (KiL) as "combining various types of explicit knowledge with data-driven deep learning techniques." They identify three infusion levels (shallow, semi-deep, deep) and position KiL as "a sweet spot in neuro-symbolic AI."
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,8 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: The Competitive Argument
|
||||
type: reference
|
||||
tags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
* The Competitive Argument
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:ID: 2e7d9fe6-6e78-41a0-96ad-b07777275d23
|
||||
:ID: design-competitive
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-05-10 Sun]
|
||||
:WEIGHT: 40
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-06-04 Thu]
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
#+title: The Competitive Argument
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
No competitor has this problem because no competitor has a symbolic engine. The 55 systems surveyed in the competitive landscape range from pure chat agents (Claude, ChatGPT) to agent harnesses (Claude Code, OpenCode, Hermes) to platform agents (OpenClaw). None of them encode knowledge as formal facts with provenance. None of them verify extractions against an existing knowledge base. None of them can prove properties about their own rulesets.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,16 +1,8 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Whitehead's Process Philosophy and Type Theory
|
||||
type: reference
|
||||
tags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
* Whitehead's Process Philosophy and Type Theory
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:ID: d251d338-f52e-4a17-b458-a255dd097b98
|
||||
:ID: design-validation-whitehead
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-05-14 Thu]
|
||||
:WEIGHT: 40
|
||||
:CREATED: [2026-06-04 Thu]
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
#+title: Whitehead's Process Philosophy and Type Theory
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
||||
|
||||
Alfred North Whitehead's two major bodies of work — /Principia Mathematica/ (1910–1913, with Bertrand Russell) and /Process and Reality/ (1929) — provide both the historical foundation and the descriptive vocabulary for Passepartout's architecture. The first gave us the type theory that structures the gate stack; the second gave us the process ontology that describes the pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user