fix: inline org-mode interlinks instead of parenthetical bare [[file:...]] links
This commit is contained in:
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
||||
#+title: Triad — Systemic Effects Over Time
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:strategy:effects:geopolitics:society:
|
||||
|
||||
The triad ([[file:triad-overview.org][Logos + Stoa + Agora]]) is not a product in an existing category. Verified infrastructure is a new category, and every existing category — cloud, AI, OS, social, payments, compliance, governance — eventually migrates into it because the alternative becomes indefensible.
|
||||
The [[file:triad-overview.org][triad (Logos + Stoa + Agora)]] is not a product in an existing category. Verified infrastructure is a new category, and every existing category — cloud, AI, OS, social, payments, compliance, governance — eventually migrates into it because the alternative becomes indefensible.
|
||||
|
||||
Using the [[file:orders-of-magnitude-time.org][orders-of-magnitude framework]], the effects cascade across time scales. Each scale is qualitatively different, not just more of the same.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ The effect compounds: proof repositories accumulate lemma libraries across field
|
||||
|
||||
The first enterprise that replaces a SOC2 audit with a gate rule saves $500K and two weeks. The Big Four consulting revenue in GRC (governance, risk, compliance) starts eroding — first at the margins (automated control testing), then structurally (the entire audit function).
|
||||
|
||||
Gate rule packages ([[file:domain-gate-packages.org]]) sell to the same CISO who buys audit prep today. The difference: audit prep is a cost center; gate rules are an investment that compounds.
|
||||
[[file:domain-gate-packages.org][Gate rule packages]] sell to the same CISO who buys audit prep today. The difference: audit prep is a cost center; gate rules are an investment that compounds.
|
||||
|
||||
** Political: regulation becomes executable
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ This shifts the entire AI safety discourse. The question stops being "what shoul
|
||||
|
||||
** Social: institutional trust gives way to computational trust
|
||||
|
||||
/I verified it/ replaces /I trust the auditor/. DIDs make platform-owned identity look like a historical anomaly. The PDS model ([[file:pds-as-a-service.org]]) makes surveillance advertising technically impossible without the user's active consent gate.
|
||||
/I verified it/ replaces /I trust the auditor/. DIDs make platform-owned identity look like a historical anomaly. The [[file:pds-as-a-service.org][PDS model]] makes surveillance advertising technically impossible without the user's active consent gate.
|
||||
|
||||
The social contract around data shifts: companies don't own user data because the architecture literally prevents them from accessing it without a permission gate. The GDPR model (notice + consent) was a regulation trying to fix bad architecture. The PDS model is architecture that makes bad behaviour impossible.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ The switching cost to unverified infrastructure becomes infinite. No enterprise
|
||||
|
||||
** Geopolitical: compute becomes a strategic asset
|
||||
|
||||
The compute marketplace ([[file:compute-marketplace.org]]) becomes a geopolitical asset on the order of SWIFT or the dollar. Whoever provisions the largest verified compute capacity becomes the default infrastructure provider for any nation that wants verified digital sovereignty.
|
||||
The [[file:compute-marketplace.org][compute marketplace]] becomes a geopolitical asset on the order of SWIFT or the dollar. Whoever provisions the largest verified compute capacity becomes the default infrastructure provider for any nation that wants verified digital sovereignty.
|
||||
|
||||
The triad is inherently anti-surveillance-capitalist architecture. The PDS model does not do bulk surveillance. This makes it threatening to both:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ The nations that adopt verified infrastructure are in one economic sphere. The n
|
||||
|
||||
** Political: liquid democracy infrastructure at scale
|
||||
|
||||
Verifiable proxy voting, delegation chains, quadratic funding for public goods ([[file:agora-contracts.org]]) — these are not experiments. They become infrastructure that nation-states adopt because the alternative (unverifiable voting, opaque governance) becomes indefensible.
|
||||
Verifiable proxy voting, delegation chains, quadratic funding for [[file:agora-contracts.org][public goods (Agora contracts)]] — these are not experiments. They become infrastructure that nation-states adopt because the alternative (unverifiable voting, opaque governance) becomes indefensible.
|
||||
|
||||
The effect is not that democracy becomes digital. The effect is that /trust in institutions/ becomes a measurable property rather than a polling number. Did the government follow its own rules? The proof log says yes or no. This is the political equivalent of the scientific reproducibility shift: institutions that can produce proof logs are trusted; institutions that cannot are not.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user