Restructure economics doc into 27 org-roam interlinked nodes
Replace monolithic passepartout-economics.org with directory of org-roam style nodes, each with :ID: property and cross-references using [[id:uuid][title]] format. 27 nodes organized by theme: - Core: index, triad overview, agora, stoa - Revenue: verification appliance, domain gate packages, evaluation harness, skill marketplace, agora usernames, PDS service, compute marketplace - Strategy: investment thesis, moats, licensing, patents, AI industry impact - Analysis: lisp economics, sufficiency flip, time estimates, cost structure, gate rule encoding, upgrade lifecycle, biology parallels, symbolics comparison - Big money: verification monopoly, infrastructure lock-in Old file kept as archive with redirect links to new structure.
This commit is contained in:
18
ideas/passepartout-economics/lisp-economics.org
Normal file
18
ideas/passepartout-economics/lisp-economics.org
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:ID: 9af13fff-9725-542b-93b1-a555bc74ad72
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
#+title: Why Lisp Is Economically Viable Now
|
||||
#+filetags: :passepartout:economics:lisp:history:C:viability:
|
||||
|
||||
The 1980s trade-off was: C is cheap enough for the market. Correctness is a luxury the market cannot afford. The 2020s trade-off is: C is expensive for the market. Incorrectness has become the dominant cost of software. Lisp's verification infrastructure is now the cheaper option.
|
||||
|
||||
Four transformations flipped the economics:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Memory is free.** 40MB runtime is noise on a $20 Raspberry Pi with 8GB RAM. In 1980, DRAM was ~$5,000/MB.
|
||||
2. **Transistors are free.** Modern ARM Cortex-A72 has billions of transistors. GC and type dispatch cost nothing because the transistors are there whether used or not.
|
||||
3. **Complexity saturates human verification.** Systems are tens of millions of lines. Testing is necessary but insufficient — zero-day vulnerabilities prove bugs survive all testing. Formal verification is the only known path.
|
||||
4. **Cost of failure exceeds cost of verification.** A single breach costs millions. Regulation mandates provable compliance. Proving correctness is cheaper than not proving it.
|
||||
|
||||
The verification appliance (AGPL symbolic engine + RISC-V Lisp μcode on FPGA) costs $5,000/year and replaces $500,000/year in compliance audits, breach litigation, and regulatory fines.
|
||||
|
||||
See also: [[id:13e6ae54-2d24-5aa0-b1cd-a7e8e749aa70][Self-driving Lisp Machine]], [[id:2afd9a3c-e96a-54c7-ac77-a05a28065b4b][Biology parallels]], [[id:00ab3a4d-e3de-5605-a67d-12935bb36ab5][Symbolics comparison]], [[id:0b5a8a74-cfd6-542d-bc88-4eb3cd8626f9][Cost structure]], [[id:5f55bbe6-d243-5766-8ccf-5c5cc88a6542][AI industry impact]]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user