Add missing _index.org files for 7 sections: stages, ai-agents-scoping, compliance, impact, social-protocol, verification, resources — rebuild clean after file reorganization

This commit is contained in:
Hermes
2026-06-03 21:50:01 +00:00
parent ac99eed182
commit 9b795df14e
79 changed files with 156 additions and 77 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
:PROPERTIES:
:CREATED: [2026-06-03 Tue]
:ID: 6883c4d2-b63b-4d2b-b224-2240ae748e7f
:END:
#+title: AI Agent Scoping
#+filetags: :passepartout:strategy:competitive:ai-agents:
Competitive analysis of AI coding agents and assistants — Aider, Claude Code, Codex CLI, Continue, Gemini CLI, Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, OpenCode, and Thoth.
{{< page-list >}}

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,12 @@
#+title: Compliance
#+filetags: :compliance:index:
:PROPERTIES:
:CREATED: [2026-05-24 Sun]
:ID: 1c4c91ec-c465-44ab-bd91-4c3b45909ddb
:END:
:CREATED: [2026-05-23 Sat]
:ID: 7c4c5cca-1c63-4398-9b75-cf221e77dba0
:ID: 36e5b948-e07b-477f-9036-4dfe88254347
:ID: e4a7b3d2-1c9f-4b6e-8a2d-5f3c7e1b9a0c
:END:
#+title: Compliance
#+filetags: :passepartout:compliance:regulatory:
Compliance framework mapping across global regulatory regimes — GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, EU AI Act, and more. The main framework map, index, and cross-cutting analyses live here; detailed per-regime pages are in compliance-regimes/.
{{< page-list >}}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
#+title: Compliance
#+filetags: :compliance:index:
:PROPERTIES:
:CREATED: [2026-05-24 Sun]
:ID: 1c4c91ec-c465-44ab-bd91-4c3b45909ddb
:END:

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
:PROPERTIES:
:CREATED: [2026-06-03 Tue]
:ID: 96e7a54e-d801-4b6e-bdc9-ea9dbd4fa51d
:END:
#+title: Impact Analysis
#+filetags: :passepartout:strategy:impact:adoption:
Impact assessments for each phase of Passepartout's development — what changes at each stage, for whom, and at what scale.
{{< page-list >}}

View File

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
:PROPERTIES:
:CREATED: [2026-05-24 Sun]
:ID: 9af13fff-9725-542b-93b1-a555bc74ad72
:ID: 0b5a8a74-cfd6-542d-bc88-4eb3cd8626f9
:END:
#+title: Lisp Economics
#+filetags: :passepartout:economics:lisp:history:C:viability:cost:marginal:zero:
The 1980s trade-off was: C is cheap enough for the market. Correctness is a luxury the market cannot afford. The 2020s trade-off is: C is expensive for the market. Incorrectness has become the dominant cost of software. Lisp's verification infrastructure is now the cheaper option.
Four transformations flipped the economics:
1. **Memory is free.** 40MB runtime is noise on a $20 Raspberry Pi with 8GB RAM. In 1980, DRAM was ~$5,000/MB.
2. **Transistors are free.** Modern ARM Cortex-A72 has billions of transistors. GC and type dispatch cost nothing because the transistors are there whether used or not.
3. **Complexity saturates human verification.** Systems are tens of millions of lines. Testing is necessary but insufficient — zero-day vulnerabilities prove bugs survive all testing. Formal verification is the only known path.
4. **Cost of failure exceeds cost of verification.** A single breach costs millions. Regulation mandates provable compliance. Proving correctness is cheaper than not proving it.
The [[id:84a537b4-4256-50c8-91f5-dd5b4538418f][verification appliance]] (AGPL symbolic engine + RISC-V Lisp μcode on FPGA) costs $5,000/year and replaces $500,000/year in compliance audits, breach litigation, and regulatory fines. This cost structure — zero marginal cost per additional user — is what makes Lisp economically viable at scale. The [[id:13e6ae54-2d24-5aa0-b1cd-a7e8e749aa70][self-driving Lisp Machine]] is the hardware endpoint of this economic logic. For the biological analogy that explains why Lisp architecture is a natural outcome of complexity pressure, see [[id:2afd9a3c-e96a-54c7-ac77-a05a28065b4b][biology parallels]]. For the historical precedent, see the [[id:00ab3a4d-e3de-5605-a67d-12935bb36ab5][comparison with Symbolics Genera]]. The [[id:5f55bbe6-d243-5766-8ccf-5c5cc88a6542][impact on the AI industry]] is the market-side consequence.
* Cost Structure — Zero Marginal Cost
- **One-time cost:** [[id:45ea493b-94ad-5885-aa65-0c846e5c3c1d][gate-rule encoding]] for a domain (from hours for codified domains up to months for tacit domains)
- **Near-zero marginal cost:** ACL2 proof + Screamer consistency check + VivaceGraph lookup per interaction — all CPU-native, all in-image
- **No recurring LLM API costs** for the 80% symbolic reasoning layer
- **After [[id:efc76898-03f7-57ba-923d-35d65da88bb7][sufficiency flip]]:** pennies per day vs dollars per day for LLM-only
The cost curve inverts: generation is expensive, verification is cheap. This is the inversion [[id:28c46769-c14b-42aa-ac7a-69d310157f8f][Passepartout]] exploits.
Token demand shifts from "every interaction burns tokens" to "only unfamiliar interactions burn tokens." Steady-state per-user LLM consumption drops by an order of magnitude.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
:PROPERTIES:
:CREATED: [2026-06-03 Tue]
:ID: 75bc14db-d241-4af8-a4e0-f14aff654d17
:END:
#+title: Social Protocol
#+filetags: :passepartout:social-protocol:network:identity:
The Passepartout Social Protocol — identity, contracts, governance, and exchange mechanisms for the personal intelligence network.
{{< page-list >}}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
:PROPERTIES:
:CREATED: [2026-06-03 Tue]
:ID: 89909ac6-8b4f-4a60-bbeb-52992c8f5135
:END:
#+title: Verification
#+filetags: :passepartout:verification:prover:ACL2:HOL:sufficiency:
Verification infrastructure — the sufficiency flip, verification appliance, verification monopoly, and the verified skill marketplace.
{{< page-list >}}