fix: remove parenthetical (see ...) link pattern, use inline natural language links

This commit is contained in:
Hermes
2026-05-24 01:23:55 +00:00
parent 8f875dc192
commit b3d91f2e55
2 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Existing smart contract platforms (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos) verify only that ex
- Ethereum: The contract ran according to the EVM bytecode (execution validity) - Ethereum: The contract ran according to the EVM bytecode (execution validity)
- Agora: The contract is correct with respect to its specification, AND it ran correctly (correctness + execution) - Agora: The contract is correct with respect to its specification, AND it ran correctly (correctness + execution)
This means Agora contracts can encode real-world regulations (HIPAA, SOC2, GDPR) as gate rules and prove that a contract execution satisfies them. No existing platform does this. This means Agora contracts can encode real-world regulations ([[file:compliance/hipaa.org][HIPAA]], SOC2, [[file:compliance/gdpr.org][GDPR]]) as gate rules and prove that a contract execution satisfies them. No existing platform does this.
* What Contracts Enable * What Contracts Enable
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ How it works:
- Every transaction runs through the symbolic engine and produces a proof log - Every transaction runs through the symbolic engine and produces a proof log
- Any instance can verify any other instance's contract execution by replaying the proof - Any instance can verify any other instance's contract execution by replaying the proof
Revenue: Transaction fee per contract execution (see [[file:compute-marketplace.org][compute marketplace]]), deployment fee per verified contract, premium for certification weight. Revenue: Transaction fee per contract execution in the [[file:compute-marketplace.org][compute marketplace]], deployment fee per verified contract, premium for certification weight.
Comparison: Ethereum collects ~$20B/yr in transaction fees. Agora's verifiably correct contracts target the same market with a stronger value proposition. The limitation is liquidity, not technology — network effects determine adoption. Comparison: Ethereum collects ~$20B/yr in transaction fees. Agora's verifiably correct contracts target the same market with a stronger value proposition. The limitation is liquidity, not technology — network effects determine adoption.
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Comparison: Ethereum collects ~$20B/yr in transaction fees. Agora's verifiably c
Organizations running multiple triad instances need contracts that span instances: cross-instance policy, unified compliance, federated identity. Organizations running multiple triad instances need contracts that span instances: cross-instance policy, unified compliance, federated identity.
Use cases: Use cases:
- Enterprise: all instances in the finance department must apply the SOX gate rule set - Enterprise: all instances in the finance department must apply the [[file:compliance/sox.org][SOX]] gate rule set
- Consortium: each member instance votes on protocol upgrades - Consortium: each member instance votes on protocol upgrades
- Supply chain: Instance A verifies shipment, Instance B verifies payment, both must agree - Supply chain: Instance A verifies shipment, Instance B verifies payment, both must agree
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ If certification carries legal weight (as described in [[file:compute-marketplac
- Contract execution insurance: Insure against bugs in contract code (even ACL2-verified contracts can have specification errors). - Contract execution insurance: Insure against bugs in contract code (even ACL2-verified contracts can have specification errors).
- Reputation staking pool: A reinsurance pool where multiple providers stake against each other's attestations. - Reputation staking pool: A reinsurance pool where multiple providers stake against each other's attestations.
Revenue: Premiums, pool fees, actuarial gate rule licensing. Revenue: Premiums, pool fees, actuarial gate rule [[file:licensing.org][licensing]].
Why this is defensible: Insurance requires capital and track record. A new entrant cannot bootstrap reputation overnight. The early player accumulates both, creating a moat that compounds with every honest attestation. Why this is defensible: Insurance requires capital and track record. A new entrant cannot bootstrap reputation overnight. The early player accumulates both, creating a moat that compounds with every honest attestation.
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Revenue: Fee per resolution, premium for reputation-weighted arbitration (arbitr
|----------+-----------+--------------+-------+------------| |----------+-----------+--------------+-------+------------|
| Smart contracts (general) | $20B/yr (Ethereum) | Transaction fees | End State | Installed base | | Smart contracts (general) | $20B/yr (Ethereum) | Transaction fees | End State | Installed base |
| Contract templates | New market | Per-template sale | Zero | Gate rule SDK | | Contract templates | New market | Per-template sale | Zero | Gate rule SDK |
| Governance (multi-instance) | New market | Annual license | Zero | Stoa premium | | Governance (multi-instance) | New market | Annual license | Zero | [[file:stoa.org][Stoa]] premium |
| Liquid democracy | New market | Per-vote fee | End State | Installed base | | Liquid democracy | New market | Per-vote fee | End State | Installed base |
| Attestation | New market | Per-attestation | Zero | DID registry | | Attestation | New market | Per-attestation | Zero | DID registry |
| Insurance marketplace | $1T+ (global insurance) | Premiums | End State | Installed base + capital | | Insurance marketplace | $1T+ (global insurance) | Premiums | End State | Installed base + capital |

View File

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Existing coverage — [[file:verification-appliance.org][Verification appliance]
| Verification appliance | Zero | FPGA/Tenstorrent pre-loaded with Passepartout + gate rules | | Verification appliance | Zero | FPGA/Tenstorrent pre-loaded with Passepartout + gate rules |
| Domain gate packages | Zero | SaaS subscriptions per compliance domain | | Domain gate packages | Zero | SaaS subscriptions per compliance domain |
| Evaluation harness | Zero | Certification-as-a-service, regression suite access | | Evaluation harness | Zero | Certification-as-a-service, regression suite access |
| Compute marketplace | Both | Verified symbolic engine cycles (see Agora) | | Compute marketplace | Both | Verified symbolic engine cycles via [[file:agora.org][Agora]] |
| Verified skill marketplace | End State | Commission on third-party gate rules | | Verified skill marketplace | End State | Commission on third-party gate rules |
*** Unexplored Logos streams *** Unexplored Logos streams
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Existing coverage: essentially none beyond hardware sales.
| Stream | Phase | Rationale | | Stream | Phase | Rationale |
|--------+-------+-----------| |--------+-------+-----------|
| Lisp Machine hardware | End State | Tenstorrent/FPGA appliances. Hardware margins + recurring gate rules. | | Lisp Machine hardware | End State | Tenstorrent/FPGA appliances. Hardware margins + recurring gate rules. |
| Stoa premium | Both | Enterprise features: SSO, audit logging, compliance reports, team management, centralized policy enforcement. Annual seat license. | | [[file:stoa.org][Stoa]] premium | Both | Enterprise features: SSO, audit logging, compliance reports, team management, centralized policy enforcement. Annual seat license. |
| Plugin and theme marketplace | End State | Verified plugins for Stoa (editors, browsers, shells, tools). Commission on each sale. Developer ecosystem. App Store for the Lisp Machine. | | Plugin and theme marketplace | End State | Verified plugins for Stoa (editors, browsers, shells, tools). Commission on each sale. Developer ecosystem. App Store for the Lisp Machine. |
| Commercial Lisp image distribution | Both | Verified, signed, compatibility-guaranteed Stoa images. Free self-build (AGPL), paid for certified builds with SLAs. | | Commercial Lisp image distribution | Both | Verified, signed, compatibility-guaranteed Stoa images. Free self-build (AGPL), paid for certified builds with SLAs. |
| Enterprise Stoa deployment | Zero | Tools for deploying Stoa across an organization: fleet management, unified gate policy, compliance dashboard. Annual license. | | Enterprise Stoa deployment | Zero | Tools for deploying Stoa across an organization: fleet management, unified gate policy, compliance dashboard. Annual license. |
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Phase Zero target: $2M-$12M/year (from [[file:investment-thesis.org][investment
| Stream | Component | TAM | Revenue type | | Stream | Component | TAM | Revenue type |
|--------+----------+-----+--------------| |--------+----------+-----+--------------|
| Verification monopoly | Logos/All | $1B+ | Certification | | [[file:verification-monopoly.org][Verification monopoly]] | Logos/All | $1B+ | Certification |
| Infrastructure lock-in | All | $100B+ | Rent extraction | | Infrastructure lock-in | All | $100B+ | Rent extraction |
| Compute marketplace | Agora | Venture-scale | Transaction fees | | Compute marketplace | Agora | Venture-scale | Transaction fees |
| Lisp Machine hardware | Stoa | Large | Hardware + subs | | Lisp Machine hardware | Stoa | Large | Hardware + subs |
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ The phase-zero streams are all direct enterprise sales with short cycles and cle
- [[file:passepartout-economics.org][Passepartout economics (full thesis)]] — the unified economics document - [[file:passepartout-economics.org][Passepartout economics (full thesis)]] — the unified economics document
- [[file:investment-thesis.org][Investment thesis]] — three revenue horizons, $2M to $1B+ - [[file:investment-thesis.org][Investment thesis]] — three revenue horizons, $2M to $1B+
- [[file:cost-structure.org][Cost structure and zero marginal cost]] - [[file:cost-structure.org][Cost structure and zero marginal cost]]
- [[file:compliance/revenue-table.org][Compliance revenue table]] — concrete pricing per framework - [[file:compliance/revenue-table.org][Compliance [[file:compliance/revenue-table.org][revenue table]]]] — concrete pricing per framework
- [[file:compliance/_index.org][Compliance framework index]] — 41 frameworks by region and priority - [[file:compliance/compliance-index.org][Compliance framework index]] — 41 frameworks by region and priority
- [[file:compliance/first-mover-window.org][First-mover window analysis]] - [[file:compliance/first-mover-window.org][First-mover window analysis]]
- [[file:time-estimates.org][Development timeline]] — Phase Zero vs End State - [[file:time-estimates.org][Development timeline]] — Phase Zero vs End State
- [[file:licensing.org][Licensing strategy]] — AGPL + commercial - [[file:licensing.org][Licensing strategy]] — AGPL + commercial