ideas: editorial sweep — atomization, interlinking, restructuring

- Split competitive-analysis-2026-05.org → TOC + 9 competitor files in
  ideas/competitors/. Dropped date from filename. All competitor UUIDs
  generated, TOC keeps original UUID for backlink continuity.
- Deleted passepartout-economics.org archive (replaced by 27-node KB).
- Inlined 5 'See also' blocks into natural prose (compliance-index,
  first-mover-window, revenue-table, orders-of-magnitude-time,
  native-org-knowledge-base).
- Linked 7 orphan compliance pages back to compliance index + finished
  truncated sentences.
- Linked all 14 Agora requirement docs from topic-relevant pages
  (identity→lisp-machine-security, infrastructure→compute-marketplace,
  social-space→growth-strategy, exchange→agora-contracts, etc.).
- Linked ai-industry-impact from investment-thesis, sufficiency-flip,
  verification-appliance, effects-growth-flywheel (up from 1 to 10+ pages).
- Fixed CREATED timestamps to use git commit dates instead of today.
- Made all links absolute from root (no port inheritance).
- Removed stale agora/docs/ duplicate content.

ideas/compliance/pipa.org

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 :PROPERTIES:
+:ID:       e777064d-9950-42d5-980d-8c78cda91500
 :ID:       auto-pipa
 :CREATED:  [2026-05-23 Sat]
 :END:
@@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ against major tech companies. Class action lawsuits permitted.
 Who must comply: Any organization handling personal information of South Korean
 residents. Extraterritorial scope is broad and actively enforced.
 
-Why it matters: PIPA is structurally similar to [[file:gdpr.org][GDPR]] but with stricter
+Why it matters: PIPA is structurally similar to [[id:513d5996-4ac7-4567-a992-18fc01599104][GDPR]] but with stricter
 enforcement and higher penalties relative to market size. The gate stack's
 purpose-boundary gates map directly to PIPA's purpose limitation requirement.
 First-mover advantage is large — PIPA has fewer compliance automation vendors