ideas: editorial sweep — atomization, interlinking, restructuring

- Split competitive-analysis-2026-05.org → TOC + 9 competitor files in
  ideas/competitors/. Dropped date from filename. All competitor UUIDs
  generated, TOC keeps original UUID for backlink continuity.
- Deleted passepartout-economics.org archive (replaced by 27-node KB).
- Inlined 5 'See also' blocks into natural prose (compliance-index,
  first-mover-window, revenue-table, orders-of-magnitude-time,
  native-org-knowledge-base).
- Linked 7 orphan compliance pages back to compliance index + finished
  truncated sentences.
- Linked all 14 Agora requirement docs from topic-relevant pages
  (identity→lisp-machine-security, infrastructure→compute-marketplace,
  social-space→growth-strategy, exchange→agora-contracts, etc.).
- Linked ai-industry-impact from investment-thesis, sufficiency-flip,
  verification-appliance, effects-growth-flywheel (up from 1 to 10+ pages).
- Fixed CREATED timestamps to use git commit dates instead of today.
- Made all links absolute from root (no port inheritance).
- Removed stale agora/docs/ duplicate content.

ideas/triad-systemic-effects.org

@@ -1,27 +1,28 @@
 :PROPERTIES:
+:ID:       b9fa4b7b-bc61-4d7f-918d-ff687b80f2ba
 :ID:       triad-systemic-effects
 :CREATED:  [2026-05-23 Sat]
 :END:
 #+title: Triad — Systemic Effects Over Time
 #+filetags: :passepartout:strategy:effects:geopolitics:society:
 
-The [[file:triad-overview.org][triad (Logos + [[file:stoa.org][Stoa]] + [[file:agora.org][Agora]])]] is not a product in an existing category. Verified infrastructure is a new category, and every existing category — cloud, AI, OS, social, payments, compliance, governance — eventually migrates into it because the alternative becomes indefensible.
+The triad (Logos + [[id:c3b3dc41-945f-54e9-84eb-ca014114f1be][Stoa]] + [[id:1d074690-a279-59cb-b91d-e9a22ae104ad][Agora]]) is not a product in an existing category. Verified infrastructure is a new category, and every existing category — cloud, AI, OS, social, payments, compliance, governance — eventually migrates into it because the alternative becomes indefensible.
 
-Using the [[file:orders-of-magnitude-time.org][orders-of-magnitude framework]], the effects cascade across time scales. Each scale is qualitatively different, not just more of the same.
+Using the [[id:2cdca4b0-6b41-44b4-acb0-af21d0e27b00][orders-of-magnitude framework]], the effects cascade across time scales. Each scale is qualitatively different, not just more of the same.
 
 * Weeks to months — Phase Zero effects
 
 ** Scientific: verification becomes the publishing standard
 
-Passepartout gate rules turn every computational result into a machine-checkable proof. Papers carry proof logs, not just dataset citations. The replication crisis in compute-heavy fields (ML, climate science, genomics) meets its match — if the code doesn't verify, the result doesn't publish.
+[[id:28c46769-c14b-42aa-ac7a-69d310157f8f][Passepartout]] gate rules turn every computational result into a machine-checkable proof. Papers carry proof logs, not just dataset citations. The replication crisis in compute-heavy fields (ML, climate science, genomics) meets its match — if the code doesn't verify, the result doesn't publish.
 
 The effect compounds: proof repositories accumulate lemma libraries across fields, so each paper stands on verified shoulders, not on trust.
 
 ** Economic: the compliance industry's margins erode
 
-The first enterprise that replaces a [[file:compliance/soc2.org][SOC2]] audit with a gate rule saves $500K and two weeks. The Big Four consulting revenue in GRC (governance, risk, compliance) starts eroding — first at the margins (automated control testing), then structurally (the entire audit function).
+The first enterprise that replaces a [[id:ed65031c-cbd2-4ad2-bd53-a67791e183cd][SOC2]] audit with a gate rule saves $500K and two weeks. The Big Four consulting revenue in GRC (governance, risk, compliance) starts eroding — first at the margins (automated control testing), then structurally (the entire audit function).
 
-[[file:domain-gate-packages.org][Gate rule packages]] sell to the same CISO who buys audit prep today. The difference: audit prep is a cost center; gate rules are an investment that compounds.
+[[id:c34940cc-090e-57c4-8020-e78b1d32b96c][Gate rule packages]] sell to the same CISO who buys audit prep today. The difference: audit prep is a cost center; gate rules are an investment that compounds.
 
 ** Political: regulation becomes executable
 
@@ -33,15 +34,15 @@ A regulation that says "access logs must be tamper-proof" is a negotiation. A ga
 
 ** Technological: AI safety becomes engineering, not policy
 
-The verified API gateway ([[file:revenue-hub.org][revenue hub]]) proves that AI safety is a /software engineering problem/, not a policy problem. Companies don't need AI regulation — they need Passepartout gate rules between the LLM and production.
+The verified API gateway ([[id:ed05cab4-88e9-4e25-b7c9-346fa39c69a0][revenue hub]]) proves that AI safety is a /software engineering problem/, not a policy problem. Companies don't need AI regulation — they need Passepartout gate rules between the LLM and production.
 
 This shifts the entire AI safety discourse. The question stops being "what should we ban?" and becomes "what gates should we verify?" Prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage, hallucination in critical paths — all become gate rule specifications, not white papers.
 
 ** Social: institutional trust gives way to computational trust
 
-/I verified it/ replaces /I trust the auditor/. DIDs make platform-owned identity look like a historical anomaly. The [[file:pds-as-a-service.org][PDS model]] makes surveillance advertising technically impossible without the user's active consent gate.
+/I verified it/ replaces /I trust the auditor/. DIDs make platform-owned identity look like a historical anomaly. The [[id:1a2b38df-20ba-58ca-ba55-a072be67bd0d][PDS model]] makes surveillance advertising technically impossible without the user's active consent gate.
 
-The social contract around data shifts: companies don't own user data because the architecture literally prevents them from accessing it without a permission gate. The [[file:compliance/gdpr.org][GDPR]] model (notice + consent) was a regulation trying to fix bad architecture. The PDS model is architecture that makes bad behaviour impossible.
+The social contract around data shifts: companies don't own user data because the architecture literally prevents them from accessing it without a permission gate. The [[id:513d5996-4ac7-4567-a992-18fc01599104][GDPR]] model (notice + consent) was a regulation trying to fix bad architecture. The PDS model is architecture that makes bad behaviour impossible.
 
 ** Cultural: verification earns cachet
 
@@ -51,17 +52,17 @@ The /move fast and break things/ ethos ages overnight. In the C-suite, saying /w
 
 * Years — End State consolidates
 
-** Economic: the verification monopoly
+** Economic: [[id:827bc546-e887-5b7c-9b65-6392beaf0920][the verification monopoly]]
 
-If every transaction on Agora, every plugin on Stoa, every gate rule on Logos passes through Passepartout's verification, then the early player collects a tax on the entire verified economy. This is the [[file:verification-monopoly.org][verification monopoly]].
+If every transaction on Agora, every plugin on Stoa, every gate rule on Logos passes through Passepartout's verification, then the early player collects a tax on the entire verified economy. This is the [[id:827bc546-e887-5b7c-9b65-6392beaf0920][verification monopoly]].
 
-The $960B TAM ([[file:triad-index.org][triad index]]) is not aspirational — it is the cost of admission to the verified stack. Every dollar spent on cloud, AI, OS, social media, payments, and compliance eventually flows through the verification layer. The early player does not capture 100% of that, but the spread on even 5-10% is venture-scale money.
+The $960B TAM ([[id:1c3ec48b-446c-50d2-b53e-126a81f5143f][triad index]]) is not aspirational — it is the cost of admission to the verified stack. Every dollar spent on cloud, AI, OS, social media, payments, and compliance eventually flows through the verification layer. The early player does not capture 100% of that, but the spread on even 5-10% is venture-scale money.
 
-The switching cost to unverified infrastructure becomes infinite. No enterprise can justify / why would we go back to unverified code / once verification is in place. This is the [[file:infrastructure-lock-in.org][infrastructure lock-in]].
+The switching cost to unverified infrastructure becomes infinite. No enterprise can justify / why would we go back to unverified code / once verification is in place. This is the [[id:2f783eb4-638e-5afa-9b59-6224d086a712][infrastructure lock-in]].
 
 ** Geopolitical: compute becomes a strategic asset
 
-The [[file:compute-marketplace.org][compute marketplace]] becomes a geopolitical asset on the order of SWIFT or the dollar. Whoever provisions the largest verified compute capacity becomes the default infrastructure provider for any nation that wants verified digital sovereignty.
+The [[id:3c6b0449-a8fb-5b89-b82a-34efb21ef5b5][compute marketplace]] becomes a geopolitical asset on the order of SWIFT or the dollar. Whoever provisions the largest verified compute capacity becomes the default infrastructure provider for any nation that wants verified digital sovereignty.
 
 The triad is inherently anti-surveillance-capitalist architecture. The PDS model does not do bulk surveillance. This makes it threatening to both:
 
@@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ The nations that adopt verified infrastructure are in one economic sphere. The n
 
 ** Political: liquid democracy infrastructure at scale
 
-Verifiable proxy voting, delegation chains, quadratic funding for [[file:agora-contracts.org][public goods (Agora contracts)]] — these are not experiments. They become infrastructure that nation-states adopt because the alternative (unverifiable voting, opaque governance) becomes indefensible.
+Verifiable proxy voting, delegation chains, quadratic funding for [[id:64708e1f-00e9-4cb7-b44b-ea0b98e5296d][public goods (Agora contracts)]] — these are not experiments. They become infrastructure that nation-states adopt because the alternative (unverifiable voting, opaque governance) becomes indefensible.
 
 The effect is not that democracy becomes digital. The effect is that /trust in institutions/ becomes a measurable property rather than a polling number. Did the government follow its own rules? The proof log says yes or no. This is the political equivalent of the scientific reproducibility shift: institutions that can produce proof logs are trusted; institutions that cannot are not.
 
@@ -98,20 +99,20 @@ The frontier shifts. The question is no longer /can we verify this/ but /what ne
 
 ** Economic: the old economy becomes a historical layer
 
-Proprietary software [[file:licensing.org][licensing]], cloud lock-in, compliance consulting, annual audit firms — these are as alien to someone born into the verified era as mainframes and COBOL are to a cloud-native developer. The new economy runs on verified infrastructure where the marginal cost of verification is zero and the switching cost to unverified infrastructure is infinite.
+Proprietary software [[id:67faf52f-9126-50a7-b87e-2bedc610dac7][licensing]], cloud lock-in, compliance consulting, annual audit firms — these are as alien to someone born into the verified era as mainframes and COBOL are to a cloud-native developer. The new economy runs on verified infrastructure where the marginal cost of verification is zero and the switching cost to unverified infrastructure is infinite.
 
 The insurance industry, which prices based on risk, shifts to pricing based on proof coverage. Companies with full verification pay lower premiums. Companies without it cannot get insured. This is the completion of the feedback loop: verification is not just better engineering — it is a requirement for participation in the formal economy.
 
 * References
 
-- [[file:triad-index.org][Triad index]] — the full architecture
-- [[file:triad-overview.org][Triad overview]] — Logos, Stoa, Agora
-- [[file:revenue-hub.org][Revenue streams overview]] — economic effects quantified
-- [[file:agora-contracts.org][Agora contracts]] — governance, insurance, liquid democracy
-- [[file:verification-monopoly.org][Verification monopoly]] — the big money
-- [[file:infrastructure-lock-in.org][Infrastructure lock-in]] — switching costs
-- [[file:orders-of-magnitude-time.org][Orders of magnitude — time]] — the framework that structures this analysis
-- [[file:time-estimates.org][Development timeline]] — Phase Zero vs End State mapping
-- [[file:compute-marketplace.org][Compute marketplace]] — the geopolitical asset
-- [[file:lisp-machine-security.org][Lisp Machine security]] — why the architecture is anti-surveillance by design
-- [[file:ai-industry-impact.org][AI industry impact]] — how verification changes the AI landscape
+- [[id:1c3ec48b-446c-50d2-b53e-126a81f5143f][Triad index]] — the full architecture
+- [[id:a1fac32a-47de-5fbd-b67d-29152c851747][Triad overview]] — Logos, Stoa, Agora
+- [[id:ed05cab4-88e9-4e25-b7c9-346fa39c69a0][Revenue streams overview]] — economic effects quantified
+- [[id:64708e1f-00e9-4cb7-b44b-ea0b98e5296d][Agora contracts]] — governance, insurance, liquid democracy
+- [[id:827bc546-e887-5b7c-9b65-6392beaf0920][Verification monopoly]] — the big money
+- [[id:2f783eb4-638e-5afa-9b59-6224d086a712][Infrastructure lock-in]] — switching costs
+- [[id:2cdca4b0-6b41-44b4-acb0-af21d0e27b00][Orders of magnitude — time]] — the framework that structures this analysis
+- [[id:dc2e4f22-1c4c-5d4a-a151-f96e5d3b0d70][Development timeline]] — Phase Zero vs End State mapping
+- [[id:3c6b0449-a8fb-5b89-b82a-34efb21ef5b5][Compute marketplace]] — the geopolitical asset
+- [[id:1c95ce7d-a2db-506a-9608-df68f9ae211b][Lisp Machine security]] — why the architecture is anti-surveillance by design
+- [[id:5f55bbe6-d243-5766-8ccf-5c5cc88a6542][AI industry impact]] — how verification changes the AI landscape