Files
hermes-brain/projects/passepartout/strategy/upgrade-lifecycle.org
Hermes ede891f2ce Merge verification-monopoly, evaluation-harness, collective-regression-suite into one page
Combined all three under verification-monopoly.org with title:
'The Evaluation Harness — Collective Regression Suite as Certification Monopoly'
Structure: (1) vision from monopoly, (2) service from harness, (3) spec from collective-regression.
All three IDs preserved in PROPERTIES.
Deleted evaluation-harness.org and collective-regression-suite.org.
2026-05-24 19:12:49 +00:00

1.9 KiB

Upgrade and Distribution Lifecycle

Once instances diverge in both code and knowledge, naive git pull breaks things. Passepartout's architecture already has the primitives for safe upgrades:

  • Ontology versioning: every fact stores the ontology version at assertion. On upgrade, facts with old versions are flagged for re-verification.
  • Degradation, not crash: if an upgrade breaks the fact store, the system degrades to the pre-macro state (hash-table fallback, text-scan fallback). Still works — just proves less.
  • Reversible upgrades (Phase 0 undo): every upgrade produces a Merkle snapshot before applying.
  • Delta distribution: upgrades delivered as diffs against the current ontology version. Migration script runs automatically.

The upgrade is verified by the upgraded system before committing. The distributor ships the new gate vector; ACL2 reports which rules are compatible and which need review. The operator reviews only the incompatible subset. This verified upgrade process creates infrastructure lock-in — switching costs are high when all knowledge is deeply coupled to the ontology version.

Business model for upgrades: