Files
hermes-brain/ideas/passepartout-economics/comparison-with-symbolics.org
Hermes 9b2be10c77 Restructure economics doc into 27 org-roam interlinked nodes
Replace monolithic passepartout-economics.org with directory of
org-roam style nodes, each with :ID: property and cross-references
using [[id:uuid][title]] format.

27 nodes organized by theme:
- Core: index, triad overview, agora, stoa
- Revenue: verification appliance, domain gate packages, evaluation
  harness, skill marketplace, agora usernames, PDS service, compute marketplace
- Strategy: investment thesis, moats, licensing, patents, AI industry impact
- Analysis: lisp economics, sufficiency flip, time estimates, cost structure,
  gate rule encoding, upgrade lifecycle, biology parallels, symbolics comparison
- Big money: verification monopoly, infrastructure lock-in

Old file kept as archive with redirect links to new structure.
2026-05-21 19:36:02 +00:00

1.1 KiB

Comparison with Symbolics Genera

Symbolics Genera (1980s) Passepartout (2020s)
Lines ~1,000,000 ~21,000 (self-driving target)
Developer-years ~10 years, large team ~1 year, 1-3 devs
OS Built from scratch in assembly + Lisp Runs on Linux (free OS layer)
Hardware Custom Lisp Machine (entire computer) PCIe card (FPGA or Tenstorrent)
Market $50K-$100K/seat $5K-$50K/appliance
Scope Full OS + environment Cognitive agent + hardware acceleration

The Symbolics comparison is instructive: they built a full Lisp OS from scratch. Passepartout runs on Linux, providing the OS layer for free. The hardware integration is a PCIe card, not a replacement of the entire host. The scope is dramatically smaller — ~2% of the code for a fraction of the functionality that matters most.

See also: Lisp economics, Self-driving Lisp Machine