reorganized folder structure

daily/2016-08-15.org

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+:PROPERTIES:
+:ID: 0cc72fcf-38eb-414f-b0e9-51931e9adcbe
+:END:
+#+title: 2016-08-15
+
+* Academic Writing :academia:CSLA:
+:PROPERTIES:
+:CREATED: [2016-08-15 Mon 06:36]
+:MODIFIED: [2016-08-17 Wed 08:22]
+:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
+:END:
+
+(with Anna McMurry)
+
+Outline
+
+Requirements for outline
+
+outline or bullet format, not a narrative
+
+sentence outline (not a topic outline)
+
+includes research question and/or thesis statement
+
+indicates where sources will be inserted
+
+Due Thurs 18 Aug, to AW instructor by 1400
+
+The present tense is favourable for outlines
+
+Outline of a theoretical research paper
+
+Introduction
+
+Background (relevance, research niche, gap)
+
+Research Question
+
+Argumentative thesis
+
+Method of analysis and justifications
+
+Background (in more detail than in the introduction)
+
+scope
+
+Definistion
+
+Data
+
+Theoretical Framework (description, definitions, justifications)
+
+Arguments (Analysis)
+
+Conclusion
+
+Annotated Bibliography
+
+This is an organised list of sources (references cited)
+
+Each annotation should consist of two paragraphs--the first paragraph objectively summarizing the source, and the second paragraph discussing its relevance and appropriateness to your research paper
+
+Why?
+
+To review the literature on a particular subject
+
+to illustrate the quality of research that you have done
+
+to provide examples of the types of sources available
+
+to describe other items on a topic that may be of interest to the reader
+
+to explore the subject
+
+What should an annotation include?
+
+Summary
+
+What kind of course is it?
+
+What is the text's main theses?
+
+What main issues/topics are covered?
+
+How does the author support his/her argument?
+
+What key concepts/ideas does the text introduce?
+
+Evaluation of the source
+
+How might the source be useful for you?
+
+How does it relate to your research question and/or argument
+
+How does it relate to the other sources?
+
+How reliable is it? Does it contain signs of bias?
+
+How might it help you support your argument?
+
+Using sources for a variety of purposes
+
+To provide background information/context
+
+To explain important key terms/concepts
+
+To provide evidence that will support your argument
+
+To lend weight/authority to your argument
+
+To offer alternative viewpoints/opposing arguments
+
+Annotated Bibliography Guidelines
+
+No more than one source from your social sciences reader
+
+No more than one non-academic source (Government/NGO website)
+
+At least two sources from academic journals or books
+
+No more than one source in a language other than English
+
+Use Harvard citation style
+
+Approximately two pages 1.5/2.0 spaced
+
+Each annotation should consist of two paragraphs
+
+Cizre, Ü. & Yeldan, E. 2005, 'The Turkish encounter with neo-liberalism: economics and politics in the 2000/2001 crises', Review of International Political Economy, vol. 12, issue 3. Available from Taylor & Francis [15 August 2016].
+
+* Research Methods :academia:CSLA:
+
+:PROPERTIES:
+:CREATED: [2016-08-15 Mon 09:40]
+:MODIFIED: [2016-08-15 Mon 10:20]
+:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
+:END:
+
+Inductive method: building the theory out of the data (grounded theory)
+
+Deductive method: testing a theory you already have with the data
+
+* Migration :academia:CSLA:
+:PROPERTIES:
+:CREATED: [2016-08-15 Mon 14:29]
+:MODIFIED: [2016-08-15 Mon 14:30]
+:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
+:END:
+