memex: update passepartout submodule → v0.7.2, add notes
passepartout v0.7.2 (Gate Trace + HITL + Search + 11 more features): - Gate trace visualization with Ctrl+G toggle - HITL inline panels with styled collapse on approve/deny - Agent identity file + /identity command - Safe-tool read-only allowlist - Message search mode with Up/Down nav and highlights - Context budget visibility with section breakdown - Session rewind /sessions /resume /rewind - Undo/redo per operation - Context debugging /context why /context dropped - Tool hardening (timeouts, write verify, read-only cache) - Tag stack severity tiers + trigger counts - Merkle provenance audit + audit-verify - Self-help /help <topic> reads USER_MANUAL.org - Live CONFIG section in system prompts - Pads: Page Up/Down scroll by 10 lines Core 92/92 TUI Main 104/104 TUI View 29/29 Neuro 13/13
This commit is contained in:
38
notes/philosophy_of_social_sciences_academiauonpersonal.org
Normal file
38
notes/philosophy_of_social_sciences_academiauonpersonal.org
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
#+TITLE: Philosophy of Social Sciences :academia:UoN:@personal:
|
||||
#+FILETAGS: :atomic:note:
|
||||
|
||||
* Philosophy of Social Sciences :academia:UoN:@personal:
|
||||
:PROPERTIES:
|
||||
:CREATED: 1d62f991-6374-4ee0-bf61-dc28add5e300
|
||||
:SOURCE: /home/user/memex/daily/2016-11-02.org
|
||||
:END:
|
||||
|
||||
:CREATED: [2016-11-02 Wed 09:23]
|
||||
:MODIFIED: [2016-11-02 Wed]
|
||||
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
||||
|
||||
Methodological individualism is a further restriction, to
|
||||
|
||||
Essay
|
||||
|
||||
Every single question is a controversy and a debate
|
||||
|
||||
Each question is asking you to give an account and evaluate controversy and the debate. There are 2 sides. You will have to decide which order to present those two sides. The order is determined in part by your conclusion, usually the one presented last.
|
||||
|
||||
John is a great believer in dividing the essay into sections
|
||||
|
||||
Title
|
||||
|
||||
Context
|
||||
|
||||
A position 1 (main points, subsidiary consequences)
|
||||
|
||||
B critical alternative (reverse position, end up with main points, like a punchline in a joke)
|
||||
|
||||
C Conclusion linking back to the title, which is the question
|
||||
|
||||
How do rational actors theorists account for the existence of social groups?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
* Backlinks
|
||||
- Source: [[file:/home/user/memex/daily/2016-11-02.org][2016-11-02.org]]
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user