moved to new folder structure

1_daily/2016-11-02.org

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+:PROPERTIES:
+:ID: b5cfa25e-c462-4679-aba0-f54df2418768
+:END:
+#+title: 2016-11-02
+
+* Philosophy of Social Sciences :academia:UoN:
+:PROPERTIES:
+:CREATED: [2016-11-02 Wed 09:23]
+:MODIFIED: [2016-11-02 Wed]
+:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
+:END:
+
+Methodological individualism is a further restriction, to
+
+Essay
+
+Every single question is a controversy and a debate
+
+Each question is asking you to give an account and evaluate controversy and the debate. There are 2 sides. You will have to decide which order to present those two sides. The order is determined in part by your conclusion, usually the one presented last.
+
+John is a great believer in dividing the essay into sections
+
+Title
+
+Context
+
+A position 1 (main points, subsidiary consequences)
+
+B critical alternative (reverse position, end up with main points, like a punchline in a joke)
+
+C Conclusion linking back to the title, which is the question
+
+How do rational actors theorists account for the existence of social groups?