Files
memex/notes/philosophy_of_social_sciences_academiauonpersonal.org
Amr Gharbeia 4e9431ec1d memex: update passepartout submodule → v0.7.2, add notes
passepartout v0.7.2 (Gate Trace + HITL + Search + 11 more features):
- Gate trace visualization with Ctrl+G toggle
- HITL inline panels with styled collapse on approve/deny
- Agent identity file + /identity command
- Safe-tool read-only allowlist
- Message search mode with Up/Down nav and highlights
- Context budget visibility with section breakdown
- Session rewind /sessions /resume /rewind
- Undo/redo per operation
- Context debugging /context why /context dropped
- Tool hardening (timeouts, write verify, read-only cache)
- Tag stack severity tiers + trigger counts
- Merkle provenance audit + audit-verify
- Self-help /help <topic> reads USER_MANUAL.org
- Live CONFIG section in system prompts
- Pads: Page Up/Down scroll by 10 lines

Core 92/92  TUI Main 104/104  TUI View 29/29  Neuro 13/13
2026-05-08 21:56:11 -04:00

1.2 KiB

Philosophy of Social Sciences :academia:UoN:@personal:

Philosophy of Social Sciences   academia UoN @personal

:CREATED: [2016-11-02 Wed 09:23] :MODIFIED: [2016-11-02 Wed] :IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]

Methodological individualism is a further restriction, to

Essay

Every single question is a controversy and a debate

Each question is asking you to give an account and evaluate controversy and the debate. There are 2 sides. You will have to decide which order to present those two sides. The order is determined in part by your conclusion, usually the one presented last.

John is a great believer in dividing the essay into sections

Title

Context

A position 1 (main points, subsidiary consequences)

B critical alternative (reverse position, end up with main points, like a punchline in a joke)

C Conclusion linking back to the title, which is the question

How do rational actors theorists account for the existence of social groups?

Backlinks