Files
memex/0_inbox/books/TWOW/html/03.00 Necessary Truths of Ontological Philosophy.html

546 lines
52 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>Having now established spatiomaterialism as the foundation for ontological philosophy, it remains to discover the necessary tr</title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 4.2.8.2 (Linux)">
<meta name="author" content="Amr Gharbeia">
<meta name="created" content="20010831;0">
<meta name="changed" content="20150722;14449911650422">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin-left: 2cm; margin-right: 1.2cm; margin-top: 1.2cm; margin-bottom: 1.25cm }
p { text-indent: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.25cm; direction: rtl; color: #99ccff; line-height: 120%; text-align: right; widows: 2; orphans: 2 }
p.western { font-family: "Arial", sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; so-language: en-US }
p.cjk { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt }
p.ctl { font-family: "Simplified Arabic"; font-size: 10pt; so-language: ar-EG }
a:link { color: #0000ff }
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-GB" text="#99ccff" link="#0000ff" dir="ltr" style="background: transparent">
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><font size="4" style="font-size: 16pt"><b>Necessary
Truths of Ontological Philosophy</b></font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Having
now established spatiomaterialism as the foundation for ontological
philosophy, it remains to discover the necessary truths that follow
from it. The new necessary truths follow mainly from the recognition
that space is an ontological cause of the natural world, for that
entails the ontological necessity of several global regularities (at
least in spatiomaterial worlds where the laws of physics are true),
including evolutionary change. Those global regularities are one
manifestation of the wholeness of the world. But we are at a major
juncture in this philosophical argument, and it may help keep issues
clear to step back and recall what philosophy is that ontological
philosophy can claim to be a new way of doing philosophy. And see how
an <i>empirical </i>foundation can yield truths of any kind,
necessary or not, that have not already been discovered by modern
science. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<br><br>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><b>Nature
of philosophy.</b></font> Philosophy aspires to a more fundamental
kind of knowledge about the world than is provided by ordinary ways
of knowing (such as modern science and everyday practical reasoning).
Any such superior knowledge would require a special foundation.
Hence, philosophy is a two-step argument. First, it establishes its
foundation, and, second, it uses its foundation to demonstrate
necessary truths. Necessary truths are prior to what is known by
ordinary means, because what is demonstrated from its foundation
cannot be denied without giving up the philosophical foundation. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><i>Epistemological
philosophy.</i></font> That is, at least, the structure of
traditional philosophy. Though different foundations were used in
different eras of philosophy, they were always epistemological.
Traditional philosophy always used reflection on how beings like us
know in order to establish some theory about the nature of reason
(such as the intuition of forms, certainty about ideas in the mind,
and the language-users understanding of language). The fruit of
such theories was borne in the second step, when the foundations were
used to show that certain propositions about the world hold
necessarily. Those implications had an authority that was superior to
ordinary ways of knowing, for they could be denied only by giving up
the theory about the nature of reason. In other words, the necessity
of the propositions defended by traditional philosophy was
epistemological. Insofar as they were successful, what they showed
was that certain propositions are certain. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">It is now
generally recognized in intellectual circles that traditional
philosophy failed to make good on those claims. Indeed, its failure
seems so obvious that philosophy itself now seems to be a bad idea.
&quot;Foundationalism,&quot; as it is called, is not merely eschewed
by most contemporary philosophers. It is often cited as something so
misguided that it is supposed to be a wonder anyone ever believed in
it. The failure of foundationalism is the main support for
relativism, and since the most common defense against the charge of
relativism attempts to undercut it by denying that philosophy was
plausible in the first place, both sides see traditional philosophy
as childish. But it is not necessary to renounce philosophy entirely
in order to avoid relativism, because there is another way of doing
it. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<br><br>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><i>Ontological
philosophy.</i></font> Another way of doing philosophy is possible,
because epistemology is not the only foundation from which necessary
truths can be demonstrated. It is also possible to use ontology as a
philosophical foundation. Philosophical arguments of all kinds start
from our ordinary knowledge about the world, in which we recognize
that we all have bodies alongside one another and other objects in
space. But instead of establishing a foundation for philosophy by
using reflection on how we know to justify some theory about the
nature of reason, it is possible to establish a philosophical
foundation by using perception to justify some theory about the
natures of the basic substances and relationships that constitute
everything in the world. This is to move in the opposite direction
from epistemological philosophy: deeper into the natural world,
rather than stepping back and reflecting on how we know about it. But
the role of perception means that ontological philosophy must rely on
the empirical method to determine which specific ontological theory
to accept; it must infer to fewest and simplest basic substances and
basic relationship that can explain every aspect of the world. Then,
in the second step, what follows from that ontology are the necessary
truths of ontological philosophy. What is implied by the ontology has
a claim on our credence that is superior to ordinary knowledge,
because it can be denied only by giving up the best ontological
explanation of the most basic aspects of the natural world. Those
implications are, therefore, ontologically necessary. They are not,
however, certain, because their ontological foundation can be
falsified by experience. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">It may be
surprising that there is a new foundation for philosophy to use,
especially one established by the empirical method, for that is the
method of science. But we have seen what makes it possible. It comes
from recognizing that ontology itself can be explanatory, for that
makes ontology different from scientific realism. Ontological-cause
explanations are different from efficient-cause explanations. Indeed,
they are prior to efficient-cause explanations, because ontological
explanations can explain why efficient-cause explanations are true,
but not vise versa. Thus, it is possible to use the empirical method
and infer to the best ontological explanation of what exists in the
world before we infer to the best efficient-cause explanation of what
happens there. That makes it possible to have a foundation for
ontological philosophy that is different from scientific realism, or
what scientists must believe about substances in order to accept the
truth of their theories about efficient causes. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<br><br>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><b>How
an empirical philosophical foundation is possible.</b></font> Even
those who recognize that it is possible, in principle, to found a new
way of doing philosophy on empirical ontology may find it surprising
that any empirically justified foundation could support <i>new </i>truths
about the world. If they depend ultimately on perception of the
natural world, they must surely have already been discovered by
empirical science. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">But
we have already seen how empirical ontology can provide a
philosophical foundation that is different from empirical science. It
comes from the difference between the best ontological explanation of
the natural world and the ontological beliefs to which empirical
scientists (and philosophers of science) are actually committed by
the efficient-cause explanations they accept, that is, as scientific
realists. In particular, physics does not recognize that space is a
substance. Physics infers only to the best efficient-cause
explanation of what is observed in nature, and since the relevant
observations involve precise measurements, it tries to find the
mathematically simplest laws of nature that can predict the entire
range of relevant measurements. Those laws do not mention space or
time except to describe the spatial and temporal relations among
particular events that are observed, and so when scientific realists
use physics to determine what exists in the world, they fail to
recognize that space is a substance. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">There are,
as we have seen, two popular ontologies defended through realism
about contemporary physics: materialism and substantivalism about
spacetime (or what I called spatial relationism and
spatiotemporalism). Neither recognizes that space is a substance.
Materialism reduces space to spatial relationism, and while
spatiotemporalism recognizes that spatial relations are constituted
by something that exists independently of matter, it denies the
reality of absolute space in favor of spacetime. Thus, it is not so
surprising, after all, that an empirical naturalistic ontology can
demonstrate necessary truths that are not currently recognized. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><span lang="en-US">By
the same token, however, this difference between ontological
philosophy and contemporary physics can be seen as a reason for
doubting that spatiomaterialism is true. That is what forced us to
take out a mortgage on spatiomaterialism in order to use it as the
ontological foundation of our philosophical argument. We had to
promise to show how it is possible for spatiomaterialism to explain
the truth of Einsteinian physics, acknowledging that we will forfeit
our foundation if we fail to do so. Such an explanation is given
below (</span></font></font></font><font color="#000000"><font face="Arial, sans-serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><span lang="en-US">Contemporary
Physics</span></font></font></font><font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><span lang="en-US">
under </span></font></font></font><a href="/F:/Philosophy/Existentialism/The%20Wholeness%20Of%20the%20World/www.twow.net/Lo/LoOtkCaL.htm"><font color="#000000"><font face="Arial, sans-serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><span lang="en-US"><u>Change</u></span></font></font></font></a><font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><span lang="en-US">).
</span></font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
possibility of spatiomaterialism despite Einsteinian physics will be
shown by making further assumptions about the essential natures of
space and matter and showing how substances of those more specific
kinds would constitute a world in which Einsteins special and
general theories of relativity make true predictions of what happens.
This is not to give up the assumption that space, like matter,
endures through time, even though that implies that space and time
are absolute. On the contrary, it is by retaining our basic
assumptions about space and matter that we show that it is possible
for spatiomaterialism to be true of a world in which Einsteins
theories have been confirmed. But this demonstration of the
possibility of spatiomaterialism will leave us with a more detailed
conception of the nature of space and matter.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In a
similar way, the truth of the other basic theories of physics,
including quantum mechanics and what I currently holds about the
basic particles, will be explained ontologically. That will require
the assumption of still more detailed essential natures for both
space and matter. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">In
order to be clear about the nature of the second step of ontological
philosophy, however, we should recognize that this ontological
explanation of the truth of contemporary physics is not a
demonstration of ontologically necessary truths. It is, rather, part
of the project of empirical ontology itself, that is, the attempt to
infer to the best ontological explanation of the world. And since it
goes beyond the general kind of spatiomaterialism that was
established as the foundation of ontological philosophy, it is the
job of empirical ontology as a more basic branch of science than
physics. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The kind of
spatiomaterialism that has been established as the foundation for
ontological philosophy is quite abstract and general in its
requirements. Space and matter are assumed to have opposite kinds of
essential natures as substances in the sense that bits of matter can
exist independently of one another whereas parts of space have
spatial relations to one another as part of their essential nature.
Their opposite natures explain how these two kinds of basic
substances can exist together as a single world. Each bit of matter
coincides with some part of space or other at each moment as both
matter and space endure through time. These are the assumptions from
which the ontologically necessary truths follow. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">But that is
not all there is to the essential natures of mater and space, for
bits of matter also exhibit various more specific regularities about
how they move and interact. Such regularities are described by the
basic laws of physics, and if those more specific aspects of the
behavior of bits of matter in space are to be explained
ontologically, it will be necessary to make more specific assumptions
about the nature of matter. That is how we will show the
compatibility of spatiomaterialism with Einsteins relativity
theories: there are certain further assumptions about the natures of
space and matter that would account for all the observation on which
Einsteins theories are based empirically. Likewise for all the
other theories of contemporary physics. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Empirical
ontology infers to the best ontological explanation of what is found
in the natural world, and since what is found in nature include the
regularities described by the basic laws of physics, it includes
discovering the natures of the two basic substances that explains
them best. But that is the project of empirical ontology as the most
basic branch of science, prior to physics, and it is not quite what
is offered in the following sections. The argument about physics in
the following sections is only an initial contribution to that
project. Since what is relevant for ontological philosophy is showing
the possibility of spatiomaterialism, it is not necessary to identify
the <i>best </i>spatiomaterialist explanation of why the basic laws
of physics are true. It is only necessary to show that there is <i>some
</i>more specific spatiomaterialist ontology that can explain their
truth. Thus, what is offered below is not necessarily the simplest or
most complete explanation of physical laws. The formulation of that
ontological theory is left to be completed as part of ontological
science. The ontological explanation offered here is meant only to
show how such an explanation is possible within the constraint of
spatiomaterialism. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<br><br>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><b>Nature
of Ontologically Necessary Truth.</b></font> What follows from the
ontology established as a philosophical foundation is necessarily
true. In order to be clear about what that means, let me say
something more about the nature of truth and necessity. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><i>The
Nature of Truth.</i></font> We assume that propositions are true when
they correspond to what exists. That is to accept the correspondence
theory of truth, and that should not be problematic, because it is
what is ordinarily assumed about truth. It is part of the natural
attitude from which philosophical arguments of all kinds begin. Both
the ontological theory itself and the necessary truths that follow
from it are true in the sense of corresponding to the world, if they
are true at all. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Even though
we used the empirical method to choose which ontological theory to
believe, to believe the theory is to believe that it is true, and
thus, since we accept the correspondence theory of truth, we take
that to mean that spatiomaterialism corresponds to what exists. The
world is actually constituted by space and matter as substances
enduring through time. As a theory in ontology, however, it
corresponds to the most basic aspects of the world, which include not
only the essential natures of the basic substances and their basic
relationship, but also the nature of substance as substance (both
existential and essential aspects) -- and even the fact that the
world is constituted by basic substances that exist together as a
world in a basic way. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">What
follows logically from the ontological theory that best explains the
world ontologically is also true in the sense of corresponding to
what exists. But our reason for believing they are true is different,
because they must be true, if the ontological theory form which they
follow is true, and we have other reasons for believing that the
ontological theory is true. Given the truth of the ontological
theory, what follows from it must be true, and that logical
entailment is one sense in which they are necessary truth. But it is
not all that is meant by saying that they are ontologically
necessary. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><i>The
Nature of Ontological Necessity</i></font>. In order for propositions
to be ontologically necessary, they must follow logically from the
ontological theory established in the foundation. But ontological
necessity is more than mere logical necessity. What makes them
<i>ontologically </i>necessary is that the premises from which they
follow logically is the ontological theory that offers the best
ontological explanation of what is found in the world. That is, what
follows from the ontology inherits its authority, and that gives
those implications a special claim to credence when it comes to
settling issues that arise from our ordinary ways of knowing. It is a
more fundamental truth about the world and deserves special respect
relative to what is known by ordinary means. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Though
ontologically necessary truths cannot directly contradict what is
observed (since that would falsify the ontological theory from which
they follow), they can settle issues that arise in ordinary ways of
knowing. For example, when there is a dispute about what caused some
particular event in the world and one of the alternative explanations
is contrary to what is necessarily true, there is good reason to
dismiss it in favor of the other alternatives. To insist that that
alternative is possible would be to give up the best ontological
explanation of the world. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
difference between ontological and mere logical necessity can,
perhaps, be elucidated by suggesting that ontological philosophy is
an <i>explanation </i>of <i>why </i>its implications are true. The
premise from which ontologically necessary truths follow is an
ontological theory, which describes the most basic aspects of the
world, and thus, formal derivations from it involve the construction
of further aspects of the world, showing either that they are
possible or impossible. That is the content or meaning of the
derivation, and since these aspects are fundamental, they can be seen
as permitting some beliefs about the world because they could
correspond to what exists in the world or as prohibiting them because
they would not.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">For
example, since each bit of matter is assumed to coincide with some
part of space or another, spatiomaterialism implies that bits of
matter have spatial relations to one another that all fit together as
a three-dimensional geometrical whole. Thus, observations of spatial
relations that seem to contradict geometry should be doubted, because
they cannot correspond to anything in a spatiomaterial world. And
since space and time are both continuous, change is possible, for
bits of matter can move from one part of space to another without
changing their natures or basic relationship. Thus, we should expect
reports of objects moving, because there can be aspects of a
spatiomaterial world to which they correspond. But that explanation
of the possibility of motion also implies that it is not possible for
bits of matter to change their location in space without moving
across space between their origin and destination. Thus, one should
doubt reports of objects flitting about in space discontinuously
because there is no aspect to which they can correspond in a
spatiomaterial world. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">We can
understand formal derivations from spatiomaterialism as the
construction of aspects of the world from ontological causes because
we have, in addition to the use of language, a faculty of spatial
imagination. Both these cognitive powers will be explained later as
essential traits of rational beings (when we see why rational beings
are necessary beings in a spatiomaterial world like ours). We do not,
of course, need to understand how we are able to understand this
argument in order to understand it. But it may help clarify how this
argument for necessary truths is intended, if I make clear that I am
assuming that we are able to <i>think about the spatial aspects of
the world in a non-linguistic way</i>. This is what is involved in
<i>understanding </i>ontological explanations as something more than
the formal relationship that holds between the ontological theory
itself and the propositions it implies. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
correspondence that makes the ontological theory and its implications
true is, therefore, one that involves spatial imagination as well as
the formal linguistic structure of the propositions: the images in
spatial imagination must correspond to aspects of the world in order
for the sentences whose meanings they are to correspond to them. That
warning may help avoid confusion about the way in which the
correspondence of sentences to the world will be explained, when we
finally get around to explaining the nature of reason ontologically.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Ontologically
necessary truths can be interpreted, therefore, as truths that hold
in every possible world. In this case, the ontologically necessary
truths are truths that hold in any possible spatiomaterial world.
Spatial imagination enables us to survey the range of possible
spatiomaterial worlds. That range is still rather broad, since
spatiomaterialism is still a rather general and abstract about the
nature of the world. Accordingly, the necessary truths that follow
from it without further assumptions are not very exacting. They
include the fact that bits of matter all have geometrically coherent
spatial relations, that their spatial relations can change, that they
can change only by motion, and a similar set of principles about
interactions. But otherwise they are not very specific about how and
why spatial relations change. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><i>Conditional
ontologically necessary truths.</i></font> There is, however, an
important distinction among ontologically necessary truth which
arises from the ontological explanation of the truth of the laws of
physics. Such an explanation of Einsteins two theories of
relativity is required in order to show that spatiomaterialism is
possible and thereby repay one of the mortgages we took out in order
to use spatiomaterialism as a foundation for doing philosophy. But
the assumption that space and matter have essential natures of a kind
that makes the basic laws of physics true will play an additional
role in this philosophical argument. Together with the recognition
that space is a substance, these more specific assumptions about the
natures of matter and space give us such a complete representation of
the essential nature of the world that we will be able to derive many
additional profound and far reaching conclusions about the world. As
we shall see, the assumption that space is a substance combines with
the laws of physics to show that various regularities hold of whole,
relatively isolated regions of space, and it is only because those
“global regularities” include evolutionary change that
spatiomaterialism is able to explain the phenomena that have raised
doubts about materialism and seemed to lie beyond the limits of
science. The nature of evolutionary change entails that certain kinds
of organisms have essential natures, including rational beings like
us, and if rational beings were not necessary beings, it would not be
possible to explain <i>consciousness</i>, <i>goodness</i>, and how
there can be something worthy of worship, or <i>holiness,</i> in a
strictly natural world. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<br><br>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In other
words, we shall need to assume that the laws of physics are true in
order to pay off the other three mortgages that we have taken out in
order to use spatiomaterialism as the foundation for our
philosophical argument. Though the basic nature of consciousness
depends only on the most basic ontological assumptions, both
substantivalism about space and the truth of the laws of physics are
required in order to show the ontological necessity of the rational
beings who are conscious. And it is that evolutionary explanation of
such rational beings that entails that there is a real difference
between good and bad for them and that there is something in the
world that is worthy of their worship. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">These
implications are also ontologically necessary, because they cannot be
denied without giving up the best ontological explanation of the
natural world. But since the ontology from which they follow is
spatiomaterialism of a kind that can explain the truth of physics,
they will be said to be “conditionally ontologically necessary
truths.” The condition on which their ontologically necessary truth
depends is that the basic laws of physics are true. If those laws
should turn out to be mistaken, then the necessary truths
demonstrated from our ontology may not be true either. In other
words, most of the propositions derived in the second step of
ontological philosophy are ontologically necessary only in
spatiomaterial worlds <i>like ours</i>, where the laws of physics are
true. Or in terms of possible worlds, most of the necessary truths
demonstrated by ontological philosophy hold, not of every possible
spatiomaterial world, but only of every possible spatiomaterial world
<i>like ours.</i></font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<br><br>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><b>S<a href="../Lo/LoOdaW.htm" target="Lo"><img src="" name="NtOdaW" align="right" width="331" height="293" border="0"></a>urvey
of necessary truths.</b></font> The necessary truths that hold in a
spatiomaterial world like ours are represented in the Whole Diagram
as following from the foundation. Some of the necessary truths are
new in the sense that they were not previously recognized as true at
all, and others are new merely in the sense that they have not
previously been demonstrated to be necessary (though some have long
been assumed to be certain or necessary in some sense). </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">There
are two kinds of necessary truths, truths about <font face="Arial, sans-serif">What
Is</font>, and truths about <font face="Arial, sans-serif">What Ought
To Be</font>, or succinctly, about the true and the good. Moreover,
these implications for science and ethics fall out in a certain
order. What is good depends on what is true (as indicated by the
horizontal arrow in the diagram of the whole argument between &quot;<font face="Arial, sans-serif">What
Is</font>&quot; and &quot;<font face="Arial, sans-serif">What Ought
To Be</font>&quot;). Likewise, within the true, what is necessary
about science depends on what is necessary about relations, just as
what is necessary about relations depends on what is necessary about
properties. And within the good, what is morally good depends on what
is naturally good, and what is absolutely good depends on what is
morally good. (These dependencies are also represented by horizontal
arrows.) </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Since
the ontologically necessary truths about what is entail both the
nature and existence of rational beings like us in a spatiomaterial
world like ours, and since it turns out that rational beings
inevitably come to understand their world ontologically, there is a
green oval toward the bottom of the Whole Diagram which represents
reason's coming to know what can be known by reason in a
spatiomaterial world like ours. </font></font></font>
</p>
</body>
</html>