Files
memex/0_inbox/in/books/TWOW/html/68 Individual and spiritual self interest.html
2026-03-15 14:37:05 -04:00

1356 lines
123 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>Individual and spiritual self interest</title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 4.2.8.2 (Linux)">
<meta name="author" content="Amr Gharbeia">
<meta name="created" content="20010831;0">
<meta name="changed" content="20150722;230118303176368">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin-left: 2cm; margin-right: 1.2cm; margin-top: 1.2cm; margin-bottom: 1.25cm }
p { text-indent: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.25cm; direction: ltr; color: #99ccff; line-height: 120%; text-align: left; widows: 2; orphans: 2 }
p.western { font-family: "Arial", sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; so-language: en-US }
p.cjk { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt }
p.ctl { font-family: "Simplified Arabic"; font-size: 10pt; so-language: ar-EG }
p.sdendnote-western { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: -0.6cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; color: #000000; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt; so-language: en-US; line-height: 150%; widows: 0; orphans: 0 }
p.sdendnote-cjk { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: -0.6cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; color: #000000; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%; widows: 0; orphans: 0 }
p.sdendnote-ctl { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: -0.6cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; color: #000000; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 12pt; so-language: ar-SA; line-height: 150%; widows: 0; orphans: 0 }
a.sdendnoteanc { font-size: 57% }
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-GB" text="#99ccff" dir="ltr" style="background: transparent">
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif">I<img src="" name="TtsOtkCRS09C_19" align="right" hspace="5" width="225" height="19" border="0">ndividual
and spiritual self interest. </font>The difference between natural
science and social science (including both the science of individual
subjects and the science of their social world) is a dichotomy in
rational culture that occurs within theoretical reason. But there a
also dichotomy between theoretical and practical reason, and within
the arguments of practical reason, there is another dichotomy. It
arises, because reason must guide the behavior of both the spiritual
animal as a whole and its individual members. This dichotomy mirrors
the difference between the two parts of social science described
above (the science of subjects and the science of the social world),
but it is not reducible to them, because it is concerned with what is
good for them, not merely explaining their behavior. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
good is what contributes to natural perfection, which is the
direction of evolutionary change, and thus, at each stage of
evolution, there is a new way in which things can be good or bad. But
at the rational spiritual stage, there are three different ways in
which things can be good or bad, because there are three different
forms of natural perfection to which things can contribute. I will
call these ways in which things can be good or bad “interests,”
because they can all be goals of behavior guided by reason. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><img src="" name="Dichotomies" align="bottom" width="404" height="300" border="0"></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><i>Rational
interest.</i> We have already seen that reason itself has an
interest, because the evolution of arguments by rational selection is
change in the direction of the natural perfection of culture. Culture
is naturally perfect when its arguments discover the true, the good
and the beautiful (or come as close as possible for arguments at its
stage). That is how reason contributes to the power of rational
beings. Thus, things are good or bad for culture or reason. For
example, what contributes to cultural evolution, such as institutions
or individual behavior that foster the exchange of arguments and
promotes their rational selection, is good because it contributes to
the natural perfection of culture. What is good in this way is in the
interest of reason itself.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><i>Spiritual
interest.</i> Culture evolves, however, within rational spiritual
animals, and spiritual animals themselves evolve by reproductive
causation in the direction of natural perfection for organisms of
their kind. As we have seen, spiritual animals impose natural
selection on themselves by their own reproduction in the harsh form
of warfare, and as a result, they gradually change in the direction
of natural perfection for them. Cultural evolution is a trait that
evolves within them because it enhances their power as rational
beings to control the conditions that affect their reproduction at
the social level. Since there is a natural perfection for rational
spiritual animals, things can be good or bad depending on whether
they contribute to it or they detract from it. Thus, spiritual
animals have an interest, which I will call the spiritual interest. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><i>Individual
interest. </i>There is, however, a distinct natural perfection about
the individual members of spiritual animals, because the evolution of
spiritual animals by reproductive causation involves the simultaneous
evolution of its members by reproductive causation. This has no
precedent, as we have seen, in the history of biological evolution.
Though evolution on two levels at once played a role in the evolution
of prokaryotic life and eukaryotic life, it stopped with the
evolution of the biological behavior guidance system that made them a
form of life (though eukaryotes compensated for this by the evolution
of sexual reproduction). Multicellular animals are not parts of
spiritual animals in the same way as cells in multicellular animals,
because the members of spiritual animals continue to impose natural
selection on themselves by their own sexual reproduction within
spiritual animals, even as their spiritual animal evolves in a
parallel way on the social level. Whereas in spiritual animals,
reproductive causation is at work on both levels, in multicellular
animals, reproductive causation is at work on only one level of
biological organization, the multicellular level. (Multicellular
animals reproduce by constructing an entire new multicellular animal
from a single fertilized egg cell, and since individual cells
reproduce only as part of that process of embryological development,
they do not impose natural selection on themselves at the cellular
level — though as eukaryotes, sexual reproduction serves a similar
function.) The simultaneous evolution of organisms by reproductive
causation on two levels of biological organization implies that
evolutionary change is in the direction natural perfection at two
levels of biological organization at once. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Since
reflective subjects impose natural selection on themselves within
spiritual animals by their own reproduction, they evolve in the
direction of natural perfection for the multicellular animals who are
parts of spiritual animals. It is as if membership in spiritual
animals were their ecological niche and they were adapting to it. But
since that means individuals change is in the direction of a kind of
natural perfection, there is a way in which things are good or bad
for the individuals. What contributes to the natural perfection of
rational subjects is good for them, and the bad is what detracts for
their natural perfection. Thus, individuals have an interest as
individuals, and that is what I mean by individual interest.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">A
difference between the interest of the individual and the interest of
the spiritual animal is entailed, therefore, by our ontological
derivation of reproductive global regularities, because spiritual
animals are an inevitable stage of evolution. In addition to pursuing
the interests of reason itself, reflective subjects use reason to
pursue both the interest of their spiritual animal and their
individual interest. This is evident on reflection from the point of
view of the subject, but the nature of reason at the rational
spiritual stage does not provide any adequate way of explaining the
relationship between the individual and spiritual interest. Though
cultures normally assume that spiritual interest has priority over
individual interest, the only explanations that can be given of it at
the rational spiritual stage are religious, thereby sewing their
worldview together by appeal to magic and mystery. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In order to
see what is good and bad for reflective subjects, let us consider
what ontological philosophy implies about how the reflective subject
is related to each of these interests that evolve at the rational
spiritual stage. That is, in what sense are they aspects of self
interest? </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Rational
self interest.</i> Reflective subjects have an interest in reason
insofar as they are producers of culture, participating in the
process of discovering the true, the good and the beautiful. Those
goals are inherent in reason itself, because the natural perfection
of culture is the direction of the evolution of arguments by rational
selection. And what is exchanged in the process of pursuing those
goals includes not only theoretical and practical arguments, but also
what Aristotle would call arguments of “productive reason” (a
kind of practical reason having to do with the goodness of products
rather than the goodness of the actions themselves).</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Though
reflective subjects have a rational interest because they participate
in cultural evolution, that is merely an interest in knowing, and it
does not guide their behavior except as participants in cultural
evolution. What is in the interest of reason is good for them only
insofar as they are the producers of cultural evolution, that is, as
individuals considering alternative arguments and rationally
selecting the most coherent argument. That is a merely cognitive
interest. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">However,
reflective subjects can also have an interest in reason that affects
their behavior in other ways, because they are also consumers of
culture. Reflective subjects draw on the arguments accumulated as
culture to judge what is good in the particular situations they face
and, thus, attain their goals through rational action. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
capacity to use reason to guide behavior is not, however, merely a
means to goals that individuals already have. It changes their
nature, as we shall see. It gives reflective subjects new goals in
addition to those that come from being participants in cultural
evolution, because it increases their power to pursue goals
generally. Thus, the maximum holistic power of rational subjects is
greater than that of subjects who use reason merely to pursue the
goals of their animal behavior. The power of reason transforms the
reflective subject into a rational being, that is, a reflective
subject whose behavior is guided by reason not merely in the
selection of means, but also in the selection of goals. And
individuals can pursue goals beyond what controls the conditions that
affect their reproduction. Thus, what is good or bad for the
individual depends on what contributes to their natural perfection as
rational beings, and that includes both an individual interest and a
spiritual interest (and, in both cases, both necessary and optional
goals). That is, as we shall see, their <i>self interest </i>as
rational beings. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">What
transforms reflective subjects into rational beings is submitting to
reason. Reflection enables the linguistic animal to represent the
causes of his own behavior as causes of his behavior in the process
of guiding behavior. But as I suggested earlier, reason is not merely
the capacity to monitor the causes of ones behavior during the
behavior guiding process, because reflection on the causes of
behavior eventually changes how behavior is caused. Rational
imagination enables subjects to see the actual causes of behavior
against the background of what is possible, and reasoning about what
to do discovers new and better goals of behavior. Assuming that the
subject can do what reason discovers to be good, this is a new way of
causing behavior. <i>Reasons </i>are causes of behavior that are
represented as causes of behavior as an essential part of the process
by which they cause the kind of behavior they do, and this change in
the causes of behavior can change the kind of behavior caused. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Reason
becomes a behavior guidance system by taking over the control of
behavior from animal desires. Since animals act on their strongest
desire at the moment, what enables reason to take control is a desire
to be rational. It is no mystery where this desire comes from, for we
have been tracing its evolution from its origin in the dominance
hierarchy established among social animals by their biological
behavior guidance system. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In social
animals, as we have seen, conflicts are resolved by a dominance
hierarchy in which a confrontation of some kind among members
determines a ranking, or “pecking order.” Desires provided by the
biological behavior guidance system motivate losers in that
confrontation to submit to more dominant members, even though it may
mean not acting on other strong animal desires, such as the desire to
eat or to mate. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">This desire
to submit became the source of the leaders power to generate
social level behavior in primitive spiritual animals, but since the
leader coordinates their behavior by using language to assign members
special tasks in his plan, it becomes the desire to conform ones
behavior to a linguistic representation of it. The linguistic system
of representation is located in the left hemisphere, and the
dominance of the left hemisphere made it possible for linguistic
representations of behavior to determine motor output to the body.
But which linguistic representations would control behavior was
determined by the leader, because the members were motivated to do
what the leader told them to do, even when they had strong animal
desires to the contrary, such as fear, fatigue, lust and anger. The
desires to submit to the leader was inevitably connected to
linguistic representations, because those spiritual animals in which
the use of language was not a reliable was of generating social level
behavior would be vanquished by spiritual animals in which it was. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">With the
evolution of psychological sentences at the rational spiritual stage,
naturalistic imagination evolved into rational imagination, and the
linguistic interaction that guided behavior was no longer merely the
distribution of a plan by the leader, but rather arguing about what
they should do in the situation. The exchange of arguments enabled
them to see which intention made their world views most coherent, and
thus, it led them to agree about which alternative to choose. Thus,
the desire to submit to the instructions of a leader evolved into the
desire to submit to reason. This transformation in the nature of
reflective subjects was assumed in the foregoing explanation of
institutions as regular social level behavior generated by the mutual
acceptance of arguments about how to behave in various situations. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
two stages by which rational spiritual animals evolve from nomadic
bands of hominids is a case of ontogeny recapitulating phylogeny, for
there is a similar two-step process by which individual subjects come
to submit to the authority of reason. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Individuals
enter spiritual animals as babies, mere bodies that must be handled
by other members until locomotor and manipulative schema can develop
into a spatial imagination. They can see themselves as bodies in a
world of objects in space with the capacity to manipulate other
objects, and they have a desire to submit to their parents in ways
that do not depend on the use of language. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">As their
sensory-motor skills are developing, their brains are also
internalizing a natural language, and that makes it possible for them
to submit to the parents linguistic instructions. At first, the
child can use only natural sentences, but some time between the ages
of 3 and 5 they acquire the use of psychological sentences, thereby
learning to distinguish how the world appears to a subject from what
it really is. But even after the child acquires a faculty of rational
imagination and the capacity to reflect on her own psychological
states, her status in the family is like that of a member of a
primitive spiritual animal, because the desire to submit to a leader
is a desire that is normally attached to her parents or guardian.
Parents are responsible for devising the plan, and the child looks to
the parent for guidance. Children are not quite like members of
primitive spiritual animals, for they are also acquiring additional
brain structures by which they can use rational imagination to
understand the arguments and judge arguments by their coherence. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Adolescence
recapitulates the change in the desire to submit to a leader that
occurred when reason evolved. Just as the authority of the leader
passed to the arguments they mutually acknowledged, so the authority
of the parent passes during adolescence to the arguments acquired
from the culture. Thus, the child becomes a rational being. It is a
transformation that in which the child matures physiologically and
acquires an interest in sex, and not surprisingly, it is marked by a
rebellion against the authority of parents, a concern with her peer
group, and a sudden interest in her own identity. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Autonomy
of reason.</i> As the desire to submit to reason develops, the child
become autonomous or has free will, because its behavior comes under
the control of reason. Reason discovers the good by a process of
arguing about what to do, and the desire to submit to reason enables
the subject to do what is good because it is good, that is, simply
because she believes that it is good. Thus, reason takes control of
behavior. “Will” is the traditional name for the intentions
formed by practical reason. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">This change
in the animal behavior guidance system is aptly called “free will”
or “autonomy,” because it enables the subject to act contrary to
strong animal desires. When the subject has reason to believe that
some course of action is good, she can act accordingly even when she
has strong immediate desires to do what she considers bad, because
the desire to submit to reason is normally the strongest desire.
Thus, the rational subject has self control and can be responsible
for doing what is good. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">It may not
seem that what puts reason in the drivers seat is a desire,
because it is normally felt only when it is not satisfied, much like
the desire to breathe. When a subject fails to do what she has chosen
to do because she believes it is what is good, she typically feels
shame (or guilt as well, if it is a failure to do what is morally
good). That is what it feels like to fail to satisfy the desire to
submit to reason, and reflecting on the cause of that feeling tends
to strengthen the desire to be rational. The fact that one has only a
feeling of power and well being when it is being satisfied does not
mean that it is not a desire at all. In animals whose behavior is
guided by desire, such a modification of the affective system is the
most efficient way of bringing behavior under the control of reason.
But the desire to be rational is not just another desire, for it is
the foundation of reason as the behavior guidance system of the
subject.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">One is not
always able to do what she believes to be good, for example, when she
is tempted to eat too much by the availability of delicious food.
Incontinence, or weakness of will, as it is called, can be caused by
a weakness in the desire to submit to reason, for example, when one
is tired, depressed or demoralized. One is responsible for such
incontinent behavior, because the desire to submit to reason is
normally strong enough to resist animal desires, at least, it is when
one understands the means that are necessary to attain the goal one
is pursuing. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Individual
self interest.</i> There are basically two ways that the autonomy
makes the rational subject more powerful as an individual than other
multicellular animals. One is the ability to act in the interest of
his individual Self, or what is traditionally called “self
interest.” The other is the capacity to pursue goals beyond those
that control conditions affecting her own reproduction., or necessary
goals and optional goals, respectively. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Necessary
goals of individual self interest.</i> The reflective subject has a
Self, as we have seen, because her faculty of rational imagination
(specifically reflective understanding) enables her to tell a story
about her self by which she recognizes her identity over time. This
is the result of accepting the arguments of the science of subjects
that have accumulated as culture. But with the desire to submit to
reason, it gives the subject far more power to attain her goals.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">By
recognizing that the subject will have desires in the future that are
not currently strong, reason puts her in a position to devise a plan
for what to choose in a whole series of situations that enables her
to satisfy them more completely than simply acting on the strongest
desire at each moment. The ability to act at each moment in a way
that will maximize the satisfaction of her desire over her whole life
makes her far more powerful than other animals, because non-rational
animals are locked in the immediate present and have only their
affective system to choose which goal to pursue in each situation. In
selecting how to behave in any situation, animals must rely on the
priorities among goals set by the biological behavior guidance system
as a result of biological evolution. Though that maximizes the
holistic power for animals of their kind, there is a way to increase
the power to control relevant conditions. With the faculty of reason
and a desire to submit to its conclusions about how to behave, she
can act with foresight and pursue long term goals, or goals that can
be attained only by how actions work together over a long period of
time. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">This
power is often what is meant by “self interest,” and that is
appropriate, because it is the capacity to act in the present moment
for the interest of ones Self. The Self includes the whole
reproductive cycle, and thus, by taking responsibility for doing what
is in its interest, the rational subject is constructing a
spatio-temporal structure, or a four dimensional object. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">If we think
of the natural perfection of the individual life as the beauty of the
Self, the rational subject may be likened to an artist painting a
portrait of herself. Her paints are behavior directed by desire at
certain goals, and her canvas is space and time, including all the
particular situations she encounters and what others contribute. She
paints her portrait in a world of objects in space, except that it is
also laid out in time. Her painting is skewed in the direc&shy;tion
of the future, since, at any point in the process, the past is done
and cannot be undone. And the future can be seen only incompletely
and vaguely through the telescope of causal connections believed to
hold in the world, since some features are painted in by unexpected
events in the natural and social world. It is as if the canvas of
space and time required one to complete the painting from left to
right. The rational subject is unable to go back and change the
paints already applied on the left, but must always apply paints on
the right side of what has already been painted, and do it so that,
when one has worked ones way to the right edge of the canvas,
everything will fit together as the portrait of ones Self. The
main tool in constructing such a work of art is a life plan. That is,
the way to make the brush strokes one applies add up to the portrait
of a beautiful Self in the end is to use ones under&shy;standing
of the world and how it works to fig&shy;ure out how to behave now in
order to fulfill as many of the goals set by desires is as harmonious
a ways as a single body can in a world of objects in space over time.
</font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">This
is the effect of having a Self as seen from our ontological
perspective, but it may not be how self interest is ordinarily
understood. The temporal structure of the Self is obvious enough in
the subjects recognition of the inevitability of death, but the
condition of actually existing only at the present gives one a
different perspective. Indeed, one has already lived part of that
temporal whole by the time one becomes fully reflective, and although
the story one can tell about oneself extends back even beyond what
can be remembered to the stories that parents tell about the earliest
years, the future is largely open, like a clean canvas. It is not
easy to predict all the situations one will face in the distant
future, and that makes it difficult to develop a plan that will cover
a whole life, even though that is what self interest involves at its
most coherent. Thus, the way to take responsibility for that future
seems to be to follow certain principles of prudence and to think of
ones interest as having a certain kind of Self, where the Self is
something that one has and carries along. That makes it seem that the
pursuit of self interest, or the good life, is a matter of observing
certain principles and priorities in situations as they arise and
filling in the details as the time comes to act on them.<sup><a class="sdendnoteanc" name="sdendnote1anc" href="#sdendnote1sym"><sup>i</sup></a></sup>
Instead of acting for the sake of ones life as a whole, one tries
to live up to a self-image, that is, have an identity of a certain
kind. Thus, it is not always clear that serving ones self interest
is the job of constructing a Self as a whole life. But toward the
end, it becomes clearer that the Self one has is the life that one
has led, and then one sees the portrait one has painted and knows who
one really is. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Optional
goals of individual self interest. </i>The capacity to act in the
interest of her Self in the sense of maximizing the satisfaction of
desires over a whole lifetime is, however, only one aspect of the
autonomy that comes from being a rational subject. We have been
assuming that the goals of individual behavior are determined by
desires, because if we set aside the goals that are justified by
religion, that is how it appears from the point of view of the
reflective subject. But from our ontological vantage, we have a
deeper explanation of what makes the goals of animal behavior good,
and taking it into consideration, we can see another way in which
rational subjects are more powerful than other animals.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Desires
set goals for subjective animals that guide their behavior to control
the conditions that affect their reproduction, and as they approach
natural perfection for animals of their kind, the relative strengths
of their desires in the various situations determines a priority
among them that makes them as powerful as possible for them over
their whole reproductive cycle. What makes the goals good is that
they control relevant conditions, because that is how their animal
behavior contributes to their natural perfection.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Rational
subjects are more powerful than other animals, because, as we have
seen, instead of relying on the priorities among goals set by the
strength of desires, they can choose goals in the present situation
that will work together with behavior in other situations to satisfy
the entire range of their desires over a period of time more reliably
and completely. But that is to assume that the desires of rational
subjects also direct them to goals that control conditions that
affect their individual reproduction, and that is not necessarily
true. One reason it is not true is that rational subjects are parts
of spiritual animals, and they have desires that adapt them to that
ecological niche and control conditions that affect the reproduction
of the spiritual animal as a whole. But our concern here is another
reason it is not true. Reason itself gives the subject the capacity
to make goals part of their individual self interest, that is, good
for them, even though they do not contribute their reproduction on
either level of biological organization.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Arguments
evolve within spiritual animals by rational selection, that is, when
they result in a more coherent worldview. This is basically an
aesthetic judgment, for it depends on rational imagination and the
capacity to compare the beliefs or intentions proposed by arguments
against the background of established beliefs and intentions. It
seeks an optimum that can be recognized only by comparison with other
possibilities, and thus, it is ultimately a judgment about how to do
the most with the least, the basic criterion of natural perfection.
Rational imagination includes, however, an understanding of causes in
both the natural and the social world, and thus, it is possible to
recognize the natural perfection of other organisms, ecologies,
cultures, or spiritual animals that have evolved by reproductive
causation. Thus, it is also possible to see what is good for them,
because they can see what contributes to their natural perfection. In
short, rational beings can discover things that are good even when
they do not contribute to their own natural perfection. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
autonomy that comes from reason enables the reflective subject to do
what is good because it is good, that is, simply because she believes
that it is good, whether or not she already desires it. Thus, when
rational subjects recognize that something they can control would be
good by seeing how it would contribute to natural perfection in some
way, they can choose to pursue it as a goal. To choose it as a goal
of ones own behavior is to make it good for one self, that is, as
part of ones individual self interest. Thus, the individual can
pursue goals that are good for them, even though they do not control
conditions that affect their own individual reproduction. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">This
explanation of the nature of reason entails internalism.
“Internalism” is the view that the motive for pursing the good
does not require a desire for the goal, but rather comes from simply
recognizing that the goal is good. When reason is in the drivers
seat, that is how behavior is caused. It is the <i>belief </i>that
the goal is good that motivates the subject to pursue it. Though he
would not have this motive without having a desire to submit to
reason, that does not make this an externalist theory about value
judgments, for the desire to submit to reason does not come from a
desire for the goal being pursued. On the contrary, a desire for the
goal comes from the desire to submit to reason. The desire to submit
to reason is neutral among goals, for it gives the subject a motive
to pursue whatever goal reason judges to be good, regardless what she
may feel about the goal otherwise.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">This does
not mean that a rational subject can make any goal good for himself
by choosing it as a goal. The goal must already be good in some way
for something, or else it would not be rational to choose it.
Choosing to pursue the goal merely makes it good <i>for </i>the
rational subject, that is, a part of his individual self interest.
However, what is good objectively must be understood to include not
just what contributes to the natural perfection that comes to exist
by reproductive causation, but also to artificial forms of natural
perfection, such as craftsmanship and works of fine art. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">As one
commits oneself to the goal, one comes to have a desire to pursue it,
but in this case, the desire may come only from the desire to submit
to reason and its inherent interest in the beautiful. Thus, these
goals are already included in ones individual self interest as
explained above, that is, as maximizing the satisfaction of desire.
But from our ontological perspective, it is important to distinguish
them from the goals that are good because they control conditions
that affect ones individual reproduction, including most of the
goals set by animal desires. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Let
us call the goals that are good for the rational subject because they
control conditions affecting his own reproduction “necessary
goals”, or goals of “narrow individual self interest,” and the
goals that are good for him because he chooses to pursue them
“optional goals,” or goals of “broad self interest.” What
contributes to the natural perfection of a rational subject includes,
therefore, both necessary and optional goals (both what is in his
broad self interest as well as what is in his narrow self interest),
though in cases of conflict, necessary goals take priority over
optional goals. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Reason
makes the individual more powerful than other animals, therefore, in
two way—in the first instance, by making them better able to
control conditions that affect their individual reproduction, but
beyond that, by enabling them to pursue other goals that are good
because of contributing to other forms of natural perfection or to
artificial perfection, such as works of art (and to pursue those
goals as efficiently as possible). </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Spiritual
self interest.</i> The other half of the dichotomy about arguments of
practical reason has to do with the interest of the spiritual animal,
as opposed to the individual subjects who make it up. Things are good
or bad for the spiritual animal in a way that parallels how things
are good or bad for individuals, because with evolution by
reproductive causation working on both levels of biological
organization at once, organisms on both levels change gradually in
the direction of natural perfection for organisms of their kind. And
since both are rational beings, both have both necessary and optional
goals. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
relationship between these two biological levels, as we have seen,
has no precedent in biological evolution. Though spiritual animals
are made up, like multicellular organisms, of simpler organisms, the
parallel between these two part-whole relations is not complete. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In
multicellular animals, natural selection works only at the higher
biological level, because all the member cells of a multicellular
organism derive from a single, fertilized egg cell. Though sexual
reproduction makes it possible, as we have seen, to focus natural
selection so that lower level structures are what evolves, traits are
selected in cells <i>only </i>when they are good for the
multicellular organism. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In the
evolution of spiritual animals, however, natural selection works on
two levels of biological organization at once. At the same time
spiritual animals are imposing group-level natural selection on
themselves by their reproduction (division into smaller groups),
individual members are imposing natural selection on themselves by
their sexual reproduction within spiritual animals, selecting some
traits, perhaps, that are not good for the spiritual animal. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">With
reproductive causation shaping both the spiritual animal and its
multicellular members to be powerful as possible over their
reproductive cycles, individuals evolve toward a natural perfection
of organisms that is subject to the constraint of being parts of
spiritual animals, and spiritual animals evolve toward a natural
perfection of organisms that is subject to the constraint of being
made up of autonomous individuals.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Spiritual
interest.</i> There are, therefore, two kinds of interests. In
addition to the interest of each individual (or what I am calling
“individual self interest”), there is the interest of the
spiritual animal as a whole. I will call it the “spiritual
interest.” </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Spiritual
animals evolve toward natural perfection for organisms of their kind
because their multicellular members (and their behavior) are bundled
together as parts of a spiritual structure that goes through
reproductive cycles as a whole and, thus, they impose natural
selection on themselves at the group level by their reproduction. War
makes group level selection very efficient, and as we have seen,
reason evolves as a way of controlling relevant conditions having to
do with choosing how to behave toward other spiritual animals. Since
they have, or come to have, the optimal part-whole relation by which
natural perfection is defined, things are good for spiritual animals
because they contribute to that kind of natural perfection. There is,
therefore, a spiritual interest, the interest of the spiritual
animal.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Since human
society is a spiritual animal, it has, like all animals, behavior as
a whole directed at goals which control conditions affecting its
reproduction. Plans for group behavior arise by rational selection
from arguments being exchanged about what the group should do, though
the choice of what to do is normally structured by a government,
because spiritual animals act mainly through social institutions. The
good pursued by spiritual animals includes, as we have seen, the
usual animal goals. Some group-level behavior acts on nature to
acquire usable energy from nature and to protect itself from danger,
such as predators and natural disasters. But some behavior directed
at other objects in space has no parallel with multicellular animals,
such as crucial decisions about war and peace in relation to other
spiritual animals. Other behavior acts on parts of its own body in
order to provide for the reproduction of its members (kinship
system), to educate them so that they can take advantage of the
culture, and to protect its health by punishing wrongdoing.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">These are
<i>necessary goals</i>, because they are conditions that social level
behavior must normally control in order for the spiritual animal to
reproduce as a whole, if the occasion ever arises. They are how the
non-reproductive work get done. But since spiritual animals are
guided by reason, the autonomy of reason also makes it possible for
them to pursue goals simply because they are good, even if they are
not good for the spiritual animal. The can, for example, act in the
interest of other spiritual animals, other animals, or the ecology.
By choosing to pursue such goals, they become good for the spiritual
animal. But there are <i>optional goals</i>, because they do not
control conditions that affect their social level reproduction. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Spiritual
interest as self interest.</i> The interest of the spiritual animal
is not, however, just an interest of the spiritual animal as a whole.
It is an interest of each rational subject who is a member of it.
That is what I mean by calling it “spiritual <i>self </i>interest.”
Since the interest of the spiritual animal is as much an interest of
the rational subject as his individual interest, he would have both a
spiritual self interest and an individual self interest. The parity
of these two interests for the rational subject follows from the
nature of reason itself. Reason is a unique kind of behavior guidance
system, because it is responsible for animal behavior on two levels
of biological organization at once. And yet the ultimate agent for
both functions is the individual.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
original function of reason was, as we have seen, to guide the
spiritual animals behavior in making choices about war and peace;
reason was naturally selected at the group level by success in war.
But since reason works by individuals using psychological sentences
to operate their own imaginations, they can simulate the reasoning of
other subjective animals, and individuals inevitably came to use
reason to see into one anothers minds, as well as to reflect on
their own. Thus, reason took over the function of guiding behavior at
the individual level, as well as the group level. Moreover, in order
to serve its behavior guiding function on both levels, reason must
not only discover what is good, but also do it. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In both
cases, the power of reason to discover what is good is a result of
cultural evolution, or the effect of a new, contained form of
reproductive causation that necessarily involves both levels.
Cultural evolution depends on the spiritual animal as a whole,
because the exchange of arguments is how arguments reproduce, forcing
a natural selection to be made. And it depends on the individual,
since reproductive success for arguments is determined by rational
selection, that is, by the individuals judgment of what is most
coherent. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">When it
comes to doing what it good, each individual subject can, on his own,
use the arguments that have evolved to discover what is in his own
self-interest (because the crucial power of reason is seated in the
parts of the spiritual animal), and he can act in his self-interest
independently of others (for he has control over his individual,
physical body). But in order for reason to guide behavior in pursuit
of the good of the spiritual animal, agreement among the members is
required, in principle, for both the judgment about what is good and
doing what is good, since only through their cooperation with one
another is the spiritual animal able to act at all. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In other
words, not only does the spiritual animal not have a body of its own,
apart from the bodies of its members, neither does it have a mind of
its own, apart from the minds of its members.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
rational subject is, therefore, the ultimate agent behind behavior on
both levels of biological organization. He is responsible not only
for pursing his own good as an individual, but also for pursuing the
good of his spiritual animal. The rational subject thinks of himself
as his Self, and thus, we can describe this twofold responsibility by
saying that he has a spiritual self interest as well as an individual
self interest. It comes from his nature as a rational subject,
because membership in a spiritual animal is part of the essential
nature of the rational subject. As such, he shares responsibility, in
principle, for choosing which social-level goals the spiritual animal
will pursue, and he has certain tasks to perform in acting on those
decisions. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>The
balance between individual and spiritual self interests.</i> Though
the rational subject has both interests and must pursue goals on both
levels of biological organization as part of the Self he constructs
during his lifetime, individual and spiritual self interests are
different ways in which things are good or bad, because they
contribute to two different kinds of natural perfection. Thus, they
may be in conflict with one another. And that raises the question of
which takes priority, that is, which goal it is good for the rational
subject to choose.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Even in
multicellular organisms, the interest of part is not <i>identical </i>to
that of the whole. Things can be good for the cell, because cells
have the natural perfection of organisms. And what is good for the
cell is good for the multicellular organism as a whole, because cells
are the lower level organisms whose behavior is coordinated in
constituting the multicellular organism. Thus, what contributes to
the natural perfection of the cell necessarily contributes, by way of
the cell, to the natural perfection of the multicellular organism.
But the relationship is not reciprocal. What is good for the whole is
not necessarily good for the part. Normally, what is good for the
multicellular organism is good for its cells, since the whole
provides the environment in which the cells can exist and their
traits can control conditions affecting their own reproduction. But
the good of the whole takes priority over the good of the cell. There
are situations in which multicellular animals sacrifice their own
parts, for example, in sloughing off skin cells and cells dying in
the process of embryological development. Thus, the part has an
interest that can conflict with the interest of the whole even in
multicellular animals.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
interests of part and whole diverge even further, however, in
spiritual animals, and that may make it seem impossible to reconcile
these two interests of the rational subject. In the spiritual animal,
as in multicellular organisms, what is good for the whole is not
necessarily good for the part. Though the spiritual animal does
provide energy and protection for the individual, its interest is not
always good for the individual. The spiritual animal may also
sacrifice its parts for social-level goals, for example, requiring
members to fight in wars where many will die and more will be
injured. Or in natural disasters, it may have to sacrifice some for
the spiritual animal itself to survive. But in spiritual animals, not
only is the interest of the whole sometimes not good for the part,
the interest of the part is also sometimes not good for the whole.
That is possible in spiritual animals, even though it is not possible
in multicellular organisms, because reproductive causation is at work
on both individual and social levels at the same time. Traits of
individuals are naturally selected by the individuals success in
sexual reproduction, and what controls conditions affecting
individual reproduction may not control any condition affecting the
wholes reproduction. Though rational subjects evolve toward the
natural perfection for organisms of their kind subject to the
condition of being members of spiritual animals, what is in the
individuals self interest may conflict with the interest of the
spiritual animal. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">For
example, it may be in ones individual self interest to commit
treason to receive a bribe, but it is clearly not in his spiritual
self interest. More generally, the pursuit of individual self
interest can impair the capacity of the spiritual animal to pursue
its social level goals by leading to conflicts among its members that
make them unable to cooperate. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Morality.</i>
That is why morality evolves in spiritual animals. The spiritual
animal needs cooperative relations among its members to pursue its
own goals, and thus, its natural perfection requires that limits be
placed on the pursuit of individual self interest. The function of
morality is to limit the pursuit of individual self interest so that
the spiritual animal is able to pursue its goals, that is, for the
sake of spiritual self interest. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
arguments that evolve in spiritual animals about what individuals
should do in relation to one another and in relation to the
institutions and laws promulgated by the government restrict that
what they can do in pursuit of goals of individual self interest.
More will be said about the content of these rules in discussing
necessary truths about what ought to be, but for now, let mention a
few basic aspects of these rules.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Some moral
rules have the function of avoiding conflicts among members that
would make them unable to cooperate. The pursuit of goals of
individual self interest could lead rational subjects to act in ways
that harm other members, such as lying about them, deceiving them,
stealing from them, and even killing them. Such harm to other members
would quickly escalate into warfare, because rational subjects are
quite able to harm others in return, since they have desires that
have evolved to enable them to fight wars. Thus, in arguing about
what individuals should do, the members of spiritual animals will
come to mutually recognize certain limits on the pursuit of self
interest. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">These moral
limits will tend to treat members equally, because they are parts of
the evolution of culture by rational selection. Moral rules must be
acceptable to everyone, because those that favor some members over
others will not be rationally selected by the latter. Equality of
treatment mirrors the symmetry among rational subjects in the
spiritual animal. (There may be institutions and social structures in
which moral rules do not treat members equally, but since the
functions responsible for them are not recognized, the inequalities
may be justified inadequately by appeal to religion.) </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Furthermore,
these moral limits will tend to leave members with the maximum
freedom to pursue goals of individual self interest compatible with
the same freedom for others, because as culture evolves, individual
will not accept arguments that limit their behavior more than
necessary. (But limits on the maximum possible freedom may be imposed
by the religion of the spiritual animal in order to ensure the
general acceptance of the culture by public expressions of
submission.)</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">There are
also moral rules requiring members to play their roles in generating
social level behavior, that is, requiring them to obey the laws
promulgated by the government and to participate fairly in its
institutions. But since the rules governing duties to the spiritual
animal are products of cultural evolution, they will also tend to
treat members equally and impose the minimum burdens on them.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Justice.</i>
Morality is only part of the balance between the individual and
spiritual interests, the part that affects the behavior of members
generally. But the spiritual animal can also act as a whole on its
own members, and since the rules governing the behavior of the
spiritual animal as a whole are also products of cultural evolution,
there are comparable limits on its pursuit of goals of spiritual
interest.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
spiritual animal acts on nature as a whole through economic
institutions, but since each member needs part of the product of that
activity to control the conditions that affect his own reproduction
as an individual, the arguments that evolve by rational selection
will tend to require that every member that puts forth a reasonable
effort to cooperate in generating social level behavior receive a
sufficient portion to pursue the goals of his narrow individual self
interest. That is the requirement that the spiritual animal provide
for distributive justice: <i>the spiritual animal must make it
possible for each member, with a reasonable effort, to be able to
attain the necessary goals of individual self interest</i>. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Punishment
is the most directly harmful way that the spiritual animal acts on
its members, but rules providing for the punishment of wrongdoers
will inevitably evolve, because it protects members against the harm
caused by violations of moral limits. But since the members are
potential objects of such behavior, judicial institutions will tend
to follow procedures that ensure that only the guilty are punished.
That is the requirement that the spiritual animal provide for
retributive justice. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
generation of social level behavior can also harm individuals, for
example, by requiring them to risk their lives in war or in
responding to natural disasters. Rules permitting such harm to
individuals will be accepted as culture evolves, because those
conditions must be controlled or the spiritual animal will not
survive and be in a position to reproduce. Since such harm is the
necessary means to the attainment of necessary goals of spiritual
interest, they are in ones spiritual self interest, and even
though it may mean that the individual dies, it does not conflict
with the attainment of necessary goals of individual self interest,
because that risk is inherent in the ecological niche in which the
individual pursues goals that control conditions affecting individual
reproduction. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">But rules
will not evolve that allow the government to inflict such harm on
individuals for optional goals of spiritual interest, for example,
because of the greater good the harm does for other individuals,
because such arguments will not be accepted by those who recognize
that their individual self interest might be sacrificed for the good
of others. That is the requirement that the spiritual animal
recognize inviolable rights of individuals.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Thus, just
as rules of morality that rational subjects must observe limit the
pursuit of their individual self interest because of their spiritual
self interest, so rules of justice that the spiritual animal must
observe limit the pursuit of spiritual self interest because of the
individual self interest. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Content
of rules of morality and justice. </i>There is a necessary content to
the rules of morality and justice, because they are basic to the
part-whole relation whose optimum is the natural perfection of the
spiritual animal. Mutual acknowledgment of rules of morality and
justice is as necessary to way in which individual behavior is
coordinated in social level action as the right messenger molecules
are to the relationship by which cells are bundled together in
multicellular animals. That is, just as the physical bodys
behavior depends on its cells having normal relationships, so the use
of language to generate social level behavior in a spiritual animal
depends on its members having normal relationships in which they
mutually acknowledge rules that require cooperation, limit the
pursuit of self-interest to protect other individuals, and respect
the rights of individual members. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
publicly recognized symmetry among members does not mean that social
rules permit no differences in benefits and burdens. It means only
that differences in treatment must be justified by differences among
the members. It would be obvious that there are relevant differences
between males and females, between adults and children, and between
young and old, and so the kinship systems would tend to reflect these
differences in assigning rights and duties. Likewise, political
institution give the leader and other officials powers that others
lack. Such differences are how institutions coordinate social level
behavior. But since they are generated ultimately by the exchange of
arguments, they are reformed when abuses are recognized, and
institutions continue to be modified until they prescribe differences
in treatment only when they are justified in terms of recognized
functions of the institutions.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Still, such
rules of morality and justice are tendencies of cultural evolution.
Culture evolves by a rational selection that depends on all the
members of the spiritual animal, and rational subjects prefer
arguments that maximize the coherence of their world views. As noted
above, there are countervailing factors that may divert moral rules
from this natural perfection of culture, and there may be spiritual
animals in which cultural evolution itself is so inhibited that it
fails to discover the good. But discovery of these rules of morality
and justice is the tendencies of cultural evolution, because they
make the arguments of maximally powerful as a whole, and that is the
natural perfection of spiritual animals at the rational stage. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>Why
be moral?</i> Even before culture and the spiritual animal are
naturally perfect, however, morality must take priority over the
pursuit of individual self interest, for if it didnt, spiritual
animals could not pursue their good, the good of the group as whole.
And there would be no rational subjects. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">There
is, however, a problem about why the individual should be moral,
because he can often serve his individual self interest better by
violating the limits of morality, and since his individual violation
will not destroy the spiritual animal and may not even deprive him of
the benefits of being a normal member (if he is not caught), he can
individually enjoy the benefits of wrong doing. Why is it not
rational to be immoral under such conditions?</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">From the
point of view of individual self interest, the spiritual animal is
only a means to attaining individual goals. It is like having a
spiritual body, in addition to his physical body, because he can
enlist the cooperation of other in goals that are good for him
individually. And if he can avoid punishment, the wrong doing will
not impair the spiritual animals ability to act sufficiently to
affect the individual. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">It may not
seem adequate to answer that morality is in the spiritual self
interest of the rational being, because this is a case where his
individual self interest and his spiritual self interest conflict. To
insist on being moral would seem to be simply to prefer spiritual
self interest over individual self interest. But these two interests
should be equal, because both are interests of the rational subject
in the same way. As a rational subject, he is just as responsible for
guiding behavior toward goals that are good on both levels. And in
the case of conflict, he should be just as justified in preferring
individual self interest over spiritual self interest. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
answer given by this ontological explanation of the nature of
morality is that rational subjects do not face a serious choice
between their individual self interest and their spiritual self
interest. There is no ultimate conflict between these interests, at
least, not in spiritual animals with distributive justice. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">There are,
as we have seen, two kinds of goals of narrow self interest,
necessary and optional, and there are two kinds of goals of spiritual
self interest, necessary and optional. Necessary goals of individual
self interest includes all the goals that must be attained in order
to control conditions that affect individual reproduction. These
include not only the physical needs to lead a normal, healthy life,
but also sufficient resources for normal social relations. (But it
does not include reproducing itself, since that is not a condition
that affects reproduction.) Optional goals of individual self
interest includes all the goals that are good for the rational
subject because he chooses to pursue them. This is possible, as we
have seen, because reason enables the subject to recognize how things
are good in virtue of contributing to natural perfection of various
kinds, not merely his own, and it enables rational subjects to do
what they believe is good. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Likewise
for the goals pursued by the spiritual animal. But the observance of
moral rules among its members is a necessary goal of spiritual
animals, not an optional goal, because that is a condition that must
be controlled in order to act as a whole. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In a
spiritual animal with minimal distributive justice, moreover,
morality does not conflict with the pursuit of necessary goals of
individual self interest, because with a reasonable effort, any
member may attain those goals. All that morality limits, therefore,
is the pursuit of optional goals of individual self interest, that
is, optional goals, which are good for the subject only because he
chooses to pursue them. Thus, the choice would be clear to rational
subjects who understood the real nature of the choice. Though
spiritual and individual interests are equal, it is a choice between
a necessary goal of ones spiritual self interest and an optional
goal of ones individual self interest, and thus, the choice is
clear.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Likewise,
rational subjects acting as agents of the spiritual animal cannot
justify sacrificing the lives of members unless it is a necessary
means in pursuit of a necessary goal, such as winning at war, because
it would be to prefer an optional goal of spiritual self interest
over a necessary goal of individual self interest. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">This
is not, of course, how reflective subjects see morality at the
rational spiritual stage. If their goals of individual self interest
have a non-religious explanation at all, they are explained as
satisfying desires, and thus, the fundamental difference between
necessary and optional goals of individual self interest is not
recognized. And since they do not see their society as a spiritual
animal, they do not understand how they have a spiritual interest. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">However,
arguments do accumulate at the rational spiritual stage that convince
rational subjects to be moral. Nor is it hard to see why arguments
for being moral evolve in every culture, since that is the only
conclusion that draws individuals into cooperation and enables the
spiritual animal to act on the social level. But without an
understanding of the nature of goodness or the nature of the
spiritual animal, the reasons for being moral are seen through a
glass darkly. It is, as we have seen, the function of religion, to
provide the ultimate justification for the practical arguments
accumulated as culture. Religion is a way of thinking about the good
of spiritual animal and their own spiritual nature. This is what
Durkheim argued a century ago. He saw God (or the sacred, as opposed
to the profane) as a symbol for the group itself, and since religion
represents the group as superior to the individual, he sees it as
giving rational beings a motive for being moral. By acknowledging and
publicly celebrating the good of the whole as something higher than
individual self interest, religious institutions point to their
spiritual nature, and that answers doubts about why they should be
moral and generates institutions that enjoin them to be moral.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">When the
standard of rational coherence by which arguments are judged is no
more demanding than at the rational spiritual stage, morality can be
justified by confused and misleading talk about gods, supernatural
powers, or nonphysical beings. Since reflective subjects have evolved
as parts of spiritual animals, the desires to submit to reason is a
presumption in favor of the arguments accumulated as their culture,
and that attitude is simply reinforced by religious institutions.
Priests of some kind have the roles of speaking for their spiritual
nature, and since it is not enough simply to say that the good of the
whole is good for the individual, they invoke the authority of
ancestors, threaten punishment by spirits, or warn of the
consequences for immortal souls in an afterlife. This is the
justification of the principles on which all their practical
arguments are based. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">When
religion fails to convince members of its practical arguments, their
conformity can usually be ensured by an evolutionary elaboration on
the basic mechanism by which individuals submit to reason in the
first place. Punishment is functional in two ways. First, as already
suggested, it helps keep civil war from breaking out. Victims of
violations of moral rules are roused to anger and inclined to respond
to wrongdoers with war-like behavior, but these desires can be
satisfied peacefully by the spiritual animal as a whole stepping in
to restore the moral balance. Second, punishment is not just revenge.
Nor is it just a penalty, as if it were a price that must be paid for
misbehavior. Punishment tends to restore the moral balance in another
way, because it is a formalized reenactment of the violent
confrontation by which a dominance hierarchy is established even
among non-linguistic social animals. Punishment tends to restore the
motivation in the individual to be submit to the arguments
accumulated as culture, because by being forced to submit to
representatives of the spiritual animal, it arouses the same social
desires to ward them that made individuals submit to the leader. This
remedy works most effectively in the case of young offenders, who
have not had a proper moral training, for in their case the offense
is usually impulsive and punishment tends to strengthen the desire
that inhibits acting on impulse.<sup><a class="sdendnoteanc" name="sdendnote2anc" href="#sdendnote2sym"><sup>ii</sup></a></sup></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Whatever
of the source of the belief that it is good to be moral, the belief
itself gives rational subjects a desire to be moral, because they
have the desire to submit to reason. Even when being moral is
contrary to individual self interest, the rational subject is able to
be moral, because he are able to do what is good because he believes
that it is good. What is added by ontological philosophy is an
explanation of how those faulty and not wholly convincing practical
arguments of traditional culture are pointing at the truth about what
is good, namely, that each rational subject has a spiritual interest
in being moral.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
capacity to be moral is a third way in which reason makes the subject
autonomous. We have seen how the autonomy of reason enables the
reflective subject to act contrary to the strongest desire at the
moment. And we have seen how it enables rational subjects to pursue
goals that do not control conditions that affect individual
reproduction. But by recognizing that individuals have a spiritual
interest, even if it is through a glass darkly, reason also makes the
individual autonomous in the sense that he can act contrary to their
individual self interests. When they recognize that it is good to
accept the limits of morality, rational subjects can do what is
morally good, because they recognize that it is good. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The desire
to submit to reason is, however, felt mainly when it is not
satisfied, and it feels different when one fails to live up to moral
rules than when one fails to live up to ones individual self
interest. As we have seen, failure to follow the plan one has
recognized to be in the interest of ones Self arouses a special
self-correcting desire, namely, shame. Shame appears as a fear of
being deprived of approval or being abandoned as worthless, and
thinking about its source motivates one to try harder in the future
to live up to ones life plan, though it can be intensified by
public recognition of the failure, that is, as humiliation. Shame may
also be aroused by the failure to live up to moral rules, but in the
case of immoral actions, the failure to satisfy the desire to submit
to reason also arouses guilt. Guilt appears as the fear of being
forced by violence to submit, and reflecting on its cause motivates
one to do what is required to be readmitted to membership in the
spiritual animal. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><i>The
inevitable incoherence of rational culture.</i> Culture is the
accumulation of arguments in rational spiritual animals, and though
they evolve by rational selection in the direction of natural
perfection for arguments of culture, even at the end of the rational
spiritual stage, the content of culture is divided by three
insurmountable dichotomies. In addition to the basic difference
between theoretical and practical arguments, there is the difference
within theoretical reason between arguments of natural science and
arguments of social science (both the science of subjects and the
science of the social world) and the difference within practical
reason between arguments about what is in ones individual self
interest and what is in ones spiritual self interest. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><img src="" name="Dichotomies" align="bottom" width="404" height="300" border="0"></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">These
dichotomies are obviously surmountable, for they have been derived
from spatiomaterialism as an inevitable part of culture at the
rational spiritual stage. They mirror aspects of the nature of reason
itself. The difference between practical and theoretical reason
mirrors the two functions of input to animal behavior guidance
system, representing the world so that the right kind of behavior is
chosen and representing the world so that that kind of behavior can
be adapted to the current situation, that is, between causing
behavior and causing beliefs. The difference between natural science
and the reflective sciences (psychology and social science) mirrors
the difference between the understanding of efficient causes in the
world of objects in space and the understanding of rational causes in
the world of subjects in social roles. And the difference between
individual and spiritual self interest mirrors a difference in the
role of reason in guiding individual behavior and its role in guiding
the behavior of the spiritual animal. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
ontological explanation of these dichotomies by the nature of reason
is so obvious at this point that what is likely to be obscure is how
the difference can fail to be understood. But the incoherence caused
by these dichotomies runs deep, for bridging them would require an
explanation of how the good depends on the true, how mind and body
are related, and why individuals should be moral. These are all
issues that remain unresolved even today, nearly two and one half
millennia after the beginning of philosophical culture.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Without
an adequate answer to these questions, culture is not fully coherent,
because there is no way of integrating adequately everything that
reason can know about the world as a single worldview. The
incoherence of culture may not be obvious, because without a more
coherent way of explaining the world, the coherence of the prevailing
arguments is basically the standard by which the coherence of
arguments judged. And at the rational spiritual stage, the evolution
of arguments by rational selection cannot be any more coherent,
because the level of organization of the arguments that are possible
at in rational level culture leaves arguments, at best, clustered
into the four groups entailed by the three dichotomies (that is,
natural and social science and individual and spiritual interest).
Appeal to a more basic principle is the only way of integrating and
unifying arguments at the rational stage, and there is no principle
that can adequately bridge the gaps between these clusters of
arguments. Indeed, in most cultures, even arguments in each of these
four clusters are far from being integrated under a single principle,
for even that level of natural perfection is probably beyond the
limits of cultural evolution at the rational spiritual stage.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">What
rational culture can do is paper over the differences among them by
religion. Religion is the attempt to explain both the natural and the
social world and, with the latter, the relationship between the
individual and the society by appeal to gods or other entities beyond
the natural world. These entities are ultimately subjects, that is,
beings whose behavior is explained by reasons, and thus, it is an
attempt to reduce all the arguments accumulated by culture to an
argument about the behavior of a special kind of subject. Such
arguments are obvious appealing. They resonate with the ancient
desire to submit to a leader in the dominance hierarchy (and the
childs desire to submit to a parent or guardian). But without an
adequate argument, traditional religion persists only because of the
failure of culture to discover adequate answers to these basic
questions. </font></font></font>
</p>
<div id="sdendnote1">
<p lang="en-US" class="sdendnote-western" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.25cm">
<a class="sdendnotesym" name="sdendnote1sym" href="#sdendnote1anc">i</a>
This is not only Aristotles view of the good life, but also what
Kant assumed in speaking of “counsels of prudence” which tend to
produce happiness in the <i>Foundations of the Metaphysics of
Morals. </i>
</p>
</div>
<div id="sdendnote2">
<p lang="en-US" class="sdendnote-western" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.25cm">
<a class="sdendnotesym" name="sdendnote2sym" href="#sdendnote2anc">ii</a><span lang="en-US">
Punishment is less effective in the case of crimes by members of
gangs, because in that case, the offender is already submitting to
the authority of some culture. Nor does punishment work effectively
in philosophical cultures, like ours, in which it is coming to be
recognized that there is no valid argument for taking morality as
prior to self interest. As that becomes widely believed, the
mechanism of morality in reflective spirits may become
dysfunctional.</span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>