Files
memex/0_inbox/books/TWOW/html/38 Structural global regularities.html

445 lines
34 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>Structural global regularities</title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 4.2.8.2 (Linux)">
<meta name="author" content="Amr Gharbeia">
<meta name="created" content="20010831;0">
<meta name="changed" content="20150722;205838345621153">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin-left: 2cm; margin-right: 1.2cm; margin-top: 1.2cm; margin-bottom: 1.25cm }
p { text-indent: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.25cm; direction: ltr; color: #99ccff; line-height: 120%; text-align: left; widows: 2; orphans: 2 }
p.western { font-family: "Arial", sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; so-language: en-US }
p.cjk { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt }
p.ctl { font-family: "Simplified Arabic"; font-size: 10pt; so-language: ar-EG }
p.sdendnote-western { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: -0.6cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; color: #000000; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt; so-language: en-US; line-height: 150%; widows: 0; orphans: 0 }
p.sdendnote-cjk { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: -0.6cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; color: #000000; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt; line-height: 150%; widows: 0; orphans: 0 }
p.sdendnote-ctl { margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: -0.6cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; color: #000000; font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 12pt; so-language: ar-SA; line-height: 150%; widows: 0; orphans: 0 }
a:link { color: #0000ff }
a.sdendnoteanc { font-size: 57% }
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-GB" text="#99ccff" link="#0000ff" dir="ltr" style="background: transparent">
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font color="#993366"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><b>S<img src="" name="OdkC23" align="right" hspace="5" width="66" height="21" border="0">tructural
global regularities. </b></font></font>Spatial and material causation
are the most direct ways that space and matter impose regularities on
change in whole regions over time. But they are not the only ways,
because the forms of matter that explain the truth of the basic laws
of physics are not the only kinds of substances that can coincide
with space. The nature of matter also makes non-basic, or derivative
substances possible, and they can work together with space as
ontological causes to generate global regularities. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Though
everything that coincides with space is made of matter, matter is
capable of being organized into more complex material substances that
move around in space and interact as units with other bits of matter,
and the wholeness of space also requires their motion and interaction
to add up in space over time. They are more complex ontological
causes, and they add up in space over time to more complex
regularities about the change that takes place in entire regions. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">These more
complex ontological causes are “derivative substances” (or
“derivative ontological causes”) because they are constituted by
the basic ontological causes, matter and space. Though they can
endure through time like basic substances, they can also come into
existence and go out of existence as time passes. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">These more
complex kinds of substances include not only material objects with
unchanging geometrical structures, such as ordinary composite
objects, from cups to automobiles, but also a more complex,
temporally structured kind of process that is based on such material
structures. The first is discussed in this chapter, and the second
will be taken up in <font face="Arial, sans-serif">Reproductive
global regularities.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">In both
cases, however, the derivative substances are ontological causes of
global regularities, because they work together with space to cause
change to be regular in entire regions by their continuous existence
through time as (derivative) substances that coincide with some part
of space or other in the region. Though the wholeness of space is
what requires motion and interaction to add up in space over time,
how their motion and interaction adds up in space over time depends
on their natures as (derivative) substances as well as the structure
of space. And as we shall see, they add up to complex global
regularities about change. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif">Material
Structures.</font> Since material structures are just material
objects with relatively stable geometrical structures, most ordinary
objects are examples of them. They have geometrical structures that
do not change in relatively wide ranges of interactions because they
are byproduct of certain cases of the tendency of potential energy to
become kinetic (one of the two material global regularities). Thus,
they continue to exist in the region even when entropy is maximum.
Though as we shall see, material structures can be constructed by
machines using free energy to do work, that is just a more complex
example of the structural global regularities to be explained. And
the existence of material structures does not depend on such
machines, because there are material structures that form naturally. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The best
examples of such naturally forming structures involve the
electromagnetic forces described by quantum field theory. It account
for the formation of atoms (from nuclei and electrons), molecules
(from atoms), and crystals, rocks and other natural material objects
(from molecules). But similar explanations hold for the formation of
the nuclei of atoms. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Material
structures come to exist naturally because of the attractive forces
that simpler material objects exert on one another. The exertion of
attractive forces across space is a form of potential energy that can
draw material objects together and bind them into relationships with
one another that are stable and do not change. The stability of such
composite objects comes from the parts giving up potential energy as
kinetic energy (or radiation) when they form themselves into a unit,
because, once united, their bonds to one another cannot be broken,
unless subsequent interactions supply enough energy in the right form
to make up for the energy that was lost forming the bonds. The
improbability of that happening is, as we have seen, what causes the
tendency to kinetic energy. (Kinetic matter and photons lack the
inherent geometrical structure of potential energy, and thus, almost
anything that happens to such matter will make it impossible for it
to regain its initial geometrical structure as potential energy). But
the quantum nature of the interactions helps account for their
stability, because that means the objects can be freed from their
embrace with one another only when enough energy is supplied by a
single interaction (as illustrated by the photo-electric effect).
Thus, such composite objects have geometrical structures that do not
change even though they are interacting with other objects (as long
as the energy of those interactions is not too great). </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Thought
material structures may seem to override the tendency to randomness,
they are just byproducts of the tendency toward kinetic energy, the
other global regularity involved in the second law of thermodynamics.
</font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Material
structures may seem to override the tendency toward randomness in two
ways. Instead of interacting by elastic collision, the parts of
composite objects exert forces that bind them to one another, and
thus, instead of being spread out evenly in space, material objects
are clustered together in the same local area. And instead of winding
up with momentums in every which direction, the parts of such
structures all have much the same direction, like a wind with fixed
parts. In other words, instead of being a gas or liquid, they are a
solid state of matter, which moves and interacts as a whole.<sup><a class="sdendnoteanc" name="sdendnote1anc" href="#sdendnote1sym"><sup>i</sup></a></sup></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">But instead
of overriding the tendency to randomness, they exemplify the other
material global regularity that is covered by the second law of
thermodynamics. The existence of material structures is part of the
price that is paid to have kinetic energy that can become randomized
as evenly distributed heat. It is the loss of potential energy (which
is actually a loss of rest mass) that binds the parts into stable
geometrical structures. Their formation is part of the process of
free energy becoming entropy. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Composite
material objects with unchanging geometrical structures are the
derivative ontological causes that will be called “material
structures” or “structural causes”. But it should be noted that
not all objects that form naturally as byproducts of the tendency of
potential energy to become kinetic energy are material structures,
and the main exceptions, not surprisingly, result from gravitation. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Stars form
as a result of gravitation, but these “composite objects” do not
have unchanging geometrical structures in this sense. Gravitation
concentrates material objects in certain locations, and though this
is a deviation from the tendency of rest masses to be distributed
evenly throughout space, the forces are so great, when enough matter
is concentrated at some location, that material objects continue to
move and interact randomly with one another, as a plasma of nuclei
and electrons (a fourth state of matter, besides solids, liquids and
gases). This gives stars only the minimal geometrical structure
required to speak of them as composite objects at all. They
approximate a sphere, but since there are no unchanging spatial
relations among particular parts that would give the whole a
geometrical structure that remains stable as it interacts with other
objects in space, they are not structural ontological causes. Though
planets and smaller astronomical bodies do acquire unchanging
geometrical structures from gravitational attraction, they also
depend on the parts forming bonds based on electromagnetic forces. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">If
gravitational acceleration is explained by the acceleration of the
ether, then the nature of the gravitational force would explain why
stars are different from objects that depend on other forces.
Material objects that are clustered simply because of the ether (by
which they coincide with space) accelerating them towards one another
do not necessarily form bonds with one another. By contrast, the
interactions on which other kinds of composite objects are based
involve either opposite forces of attraction and repulsion canceling
one another out (as in electromagnetism) or are short range forces
(as in the weak and strong forces), and they all have a quantum
nature which helps makes the structures they constitute stable. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">It should
be noticed, however, that even some composite objects formed by
forces with a quantum nature lack unchanging geometrical structures.
For example, water molecules interact by weak electromagnetic forces,
called “hydrogen bonds”, but when water forms into a drop, the
molecules continue to move relative to one another as they interact,
resembling to some extent star-like gravitational objects on a small
scale.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif">R<img src="" name="OdkC24" align="right" hspace="5" width="66" height="29" border="0">eversible
processes. </font>The existence of material structures depends on the
specific nature of the matter that helps constitute the actual world,
and when they exist, the <i>wholeness </i>of the space containing
them causes their motion and interaction in any region to add up over
time as regularities about entire regions of space. But since they
have a geometrical structure, how they add up also depends on the
<i>structure </i>of space. Though the new global regularity is rather
simple by itself, it makes all the difference in the world, as we
shall see, when combined with material global regularities, that is,
free energy, for that is what constitutes irreversible processes.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">What
is regular in the case of reversible processes is not just that the
geometrical structure of the material object does not change. That is
a property of the composite object, rather than a property of region
as a whole. But since its geometrical structure does not change over
time, there is a geometrical structure about the dynamic processes in
the region that does not change, and <i>that </i>is a global
regularity. In other words, material structures contribute to the
geometrical structure of the region in much the same way that
potential energy does, by its inherent geometrical structure. The
difference, of course, is that the material structures do not lose
their geometrical structure as potential energy tends to do as it
becomes kinetic. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">As
long as the composite objects geometrical structure does not go
out of existence, it is like a new kind of material substance, which
is not mentioned by the basic laws of physics. Indeed, the reason
material structures are ontological causes is that, like space and
more elementary forms of matter, they exist continuously over time
like substances. And since change is just an aspect of substances
enduring through time, material structures cause change to be regular
by helping constitute the process. As in all ontological
explanations, that is how the essential natures of substances help
determine the nature of what is found in the natural world. Material
structures are unchanging aspects of the substances making up the
region as time passes. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Material
structures cause a global regularity, because as they move and
interact as particular substances in space, their geometrical
structures help determine, along with the structure of space and the
other bits of matter in the region, how change occurs as time passes.
Though everything happens by efficient causation, the motion and
interaction of material structures with other bits of matter must add
up over time in space. The kind of global regularity that material
structures add up to is simple. It is just the existence of the
material structures in the region moving and interacting with other
bits of matter. And material structures with different geometrical
structure impose different regularities on how geometrical structures
of whole regions change over time. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Though
the wholeness of the space containing all the bits of matter is what
makes their motion and interaction add up over time, how the motion
and interaction of material structures adds up over time depends on
the structure of the space containing them. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">In
the first place, the uniform structure of space makes it possible for
composite objects to move without changing the spatial relations
among their parts. Every local area in space has a geometrical
structure that can contain any specific kind of geometrical structure
that composite material objects may have. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Second,
when such objects do interact, space allows what happens to depend
not only on the forces that the objects exert on each other (by way
of the forces exerted by the parts of such geometrical structures),
but also on how their geometrical structures fit together. This is a
geometrical aspect about how material objects in the region interact
with one another that cannot even be simulated by forces. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Material
structures can, therefore, be said to <i>structure </i>dynamic
processes. Thus, structural global regularities of are “structured
dynamic processes”. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Even
though structural global regularities may be little more than the
existence of material structures in the region, there is no doubt
that the existence of such geometrical structures in the region
imposes a regularity on change in the region. It can be seen in how
round pegs, but not square pegs, fit into the round holes in a board,
how rings linked with one another act like a chain, or how molecules
can be confined in a box. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Consider,
for example, a box of gas that is part of a larger (closed) region of
space. Although the molecules are not bound to the box and move
around independently of it, those on the inside never get outside,
while the molecules on the outside never get inside. This is because
the box has a geometrical structure that, together with the structure
of space, leaves no route for molecules to move from one region to
the other. The gas molecules are not equally likely to be located in
every part of the region, and as the box moves around in the region,
the structure about the distribution of matter in the region changes
in a regular way, because the otherwise randomly moving molecules
always move around inside the box. The dynamic process taking place
in that region has, therefore, a geometrical structure that does not
change over time. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
part-whole relationship in the box-of-gas example suggests a more
general point about material structures and the global regularities
they and space generate: the unchanging geometrical structure of a
composite object as a whole constrains the motion and interactions of
its parts, and that generates (regular) behavior in the object as a
whole. This is, perhaps, obvious in complex machinery, but consider a
simple example, two rings linked together. The rings can move and
interact independently of one another to some extent, but their
locations are not random, because they can move only within limits
which are imposed by the geometrical structure of the object as a
whole. This further geometrical structure about what happens to the
rings is a kind of global regularity about change over time that
might well be called the “behavior” of the object as a whole. The
behavior of chains of many such linked rings is quite useful in
communicating forces from one place to another. The notion that the
whole controls the part is sometimes thought to entail a holism that
is incompatible with materialistic reductionism, but when we
recognize that the substances constituting such objects include space
as well as matter, a regular behavior on the part of the whole is
just what is expected. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Structural
causation introduces a complication into the ontological explanations
of spatiomaterialism, because material structures are derivative
ontological causes. In order to be ontological causes of the global
regularity about change, they must endure through the whole period.
But over longer periods of time, material structures do come into
existence and go out of existence. In speaking of them as ontological
causes, we are treating them like substances, which have essential
natures, that is, properties that hold at each moment of their
existence and help determine how contingent properties come and go
over time. But since they are derivative ontological causes, we must
take into account their “generation” and “corruption”, much
as Aristotle did in explaining his very different kinds of substances
with essential forms. They are analogous to the various,
interconvertible forms of matter we distinguished in order to explain
the basic laws of physics ontologically, except that we can explain
the generation and corruption of material structures from simpler
substances by their motion and interaction in space according to the
basic laws of physics. However, the advantages of introducing this
complication far outweigh the disadvantages. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Many
puzzles are cleared up by recognizing that material structures are
ontological causes. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span lang="en-US">It
settles, for example, a question about the criterion for the identity
of ordinary objects over time that arises for epistemological
philosophers. Material objects are commonly classified by their
geometrical structures, and some epistemological philosophers (</span></font></font><a href="/F:/Philosophy/Existentialism/The%20Wholeness%20Of%20the%20World/www.twow.net/ObjText/#Hirsh82"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span lang="en-US"><u>Hirsh</u></span></font></font></a><font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span lang="en-US">
1982, p. 134) rely on it so heavily that they are tempted to believe
that simply having the same kind of geometrical structure at a later
moment would be sufficient for its identity—even if the object were
to vanish from one location at one moment and were to appear
somewhere else the next. That is not a case we need to worry about,
since it is not even possible according to our ontology. But the
recognition of material structures as ontological causes can solve
puzzles about identity posed by epistemologists who pit having the
same geometrical structure against spatio-temporal continuity. </span></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<a href="/F:/Philosophy/Existentialism/The%20Wholeness%20Of%20the%20World/www.twow.net/ObjText/#Hirsh82"><font color="#0000ff"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span lang="en-US"><u>Nozick</u></span></font></font></a><font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><span lang="en-US">
(1981, p. 29ff), for example, considers the case of Theseus ship,
which is rebuilt, plank by plank, over a period of time. One would
ordinarily claim that what results from the rebuilding is the same
ship, although none of the parts is the same. But Nozick poses a
further question by supposing that each of the parts of the original
ship is saved and later used to reassemble the original ship. He
asks, which later ship is identical to the original ship. Nozicks
answer is the “closest continuer theory”, which has intuition
deciding in each case (and for each person) which is closest. But if
we recognize how global regularities depend on ontological causes, it
is clear which ship is identical to the original ship, because only
one of them has an unchanging geometrical structure that can cause
change to be regular by existing continuously over all that time as a
substance. Its role as an ontological cause determines its identity
over time. </span></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" class="western" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The
recognition of global regularities solves various problems about the
irreducibility of less general laws in science to the laws of
physics, as we shall see in <font face="Arial, sans-serif">Epistemological
philosophy of causation</font>. The general form of the problem can
be seen in the case of structural global regularities. Science tends
to overlook this explanatory role of material structures, because it
its looking for efficient causes, not ontological causes. The only
relevant factors involved in efficient-cause explanations, besides
the laws of physics (and mathematical theorems), are initial and
boundary conditions. A structural cause is not just an initial
condition (although it can be inferred from initial conditions
together with the relevant laws of physics), because it causes by its
continuous existence over the whole period of time that the global
regularly occurs. To be sure, boundary conditions also cause by
persisting through the period of the regularity. But structural
ontological causes are not boundary conditions, for they are not just
a condition about the systems limits in space (how it is related
to or isolated from the rest of the world). Thus, structural
ontological causes tend to fall through the cracks. That is not to
say that they are ignored. It is rather they are implicit in
efficient causes that are recognized. The familiar
deductive-nomological model of explanation has no way to acknowledge
the distinctive kind of role that material structures play as
ontological causes of global regularities. </font></font>
</p>
<div id="sdendnote1">
<p lang="en-US" class="sdendnote-western" style="margin-top: 0cm; margin-bottom: 0.25cm">
<a class="sdendnotesym" name="sdendnote1sym" href="#sdendnote1anc">i</a><span lang="en-US">
This other aspect of the tendency of potential energy to become
kinetic energy is what </span><a href="/F:/Philosophy/Existentialism/The%20Wholeness%20Of%20the%20World/www.twow.net/ObjText/#Prigogine" target="_self"><font color="#0000ff"><span lang="en-US"><u>Prigogine</u></span></font></a><span lang="en-US">
(1980) and </span><a href="/F:/Philosophy/Existentialism/The%20Wholeness%20Of%20the%20World/www.twow.net/ObjText/#Prigogine"><font color="#0000ff"><span lang="en-US"><u>Kauffman</u></span></font></a><span lang="en-US">
(1993, 1995) and their followers are think of as the mysterious
phenomenon of “self-forming” or “self-organizing” objects.
See the discussion of the </span><font face="Arial, sans-serif"><span lang="en-US">Second
law of thermodynamics </span></font><span lang="en-US">in
</span><font face="Arial, sans-serif"><span lang="en-US">Epistemological
philosophy of causation</span></font><span lang="en-US">.</span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>