Files
memex/0_inbox/books/TWOW/html/45 The Gradual Evolution of RNA.html

319 lines
25 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>The Gradual Evolution of RNA</title>
<meta name="generator" content="LibreOffice 4.2.8.2 (Linux)">
<meta name="author" content="Amr Gharbeia">
<meta name="created" content="20010831;14600000000000">
<meta name="changed" content="20150721;235542097244314">
<style type="text/css">
<!--
@page { margin-right: 1.2cm; margin-top: 1.2cm; margin-bottom: 1.25cm }
p { text-indent: 1.27cm; margin-bottom: 0.25cm; direction: ltr; color: #99ccff; line-height: 120%; text-align: left; widows: 2; orphans: 2 }
p.western { font-family: "Arial", sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; so-language: en-US }
p.cjk { font-family: "Times New Roman", serif; font-size: 10pt }
p.ctl { font-family: "Simplified Arabic"; font-size: 10pt; so-language: ar-EG }
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang="en-GB" text="#99ccff" dir="ltr">
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font color="#993366"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif"><b>T<img src="" name="TtsOtkCRS01_08" align="right" hspace="5" width="150" height="63" border="0">he
Gradual Evolution of RNA.</b></font></font> We assume, therefore,
that RNA molecules were the original proto-organisms. But the
original RNA molecules must have been simple, with only a few
varieties, and barely able to go through reproductive cycles at all.
Reproductive causation would, however, make them more complex, more
diverse and better able to control the conditions affecting their
reproduction. The major accomplishment of this first stage of gradual
evolution is a much more efficient and reliable way synthesizing
protein molecule, which helps make the second stage possible. But at
this first stage, when the proto-organisms are so simple, there is a
way that reproductive causation works on them at two levels of
part-whole complexity. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif">N<img src="" name="TtsOtkCRS01_09" align="right" hspace="5" width="275" height="21" border="0">atural
selection at the individual level. </font>At the level of individual
RNA molecules, reproductive causation leads us to expect that every
new power to control relevant conditions would evolve as it becomes
possible, that is, as random variations on extant RNA synthesize
proteins happen to control some new condition that affects
reproduction or controls some old condition better. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Those
RNA molecules whose proteins controlled some relevant condition, such
as supplying nucleotides for reproduction, would be more likely to
reproduce, because they would be more likely to be located where RNA
were benefiting from them. There would be random variations on them,
because RNA reproduction is far from perfect. Kinds of nucleotides
would be substituted, new nucleotides would be added, and whole RNA
could be spliced together. Such random variations on existing RNA
would sometimes alter the kind of amino acid used at some point in
the protein or add new amino acids, and if these slightly different
proteins or slightly more complex proteins were any better able to
control the relevant condition, the RNA molecule producing them would
be located where it was somewhat more likely to benefit from them
and, thus, would be more likely to succeed in reproduction. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Since
the triplets of nucleotides are the structural causes bundled
together as a proto-organism, the relevant condition that is
controlled by the work each does is determining which amino acid is
appended in the growing peptide chain at some point. Different
triplets of nucleotides in the RNA would control different relevant
conditions by determining amino acids at other points in the protein
being synthesized. Thus, reproductive causation would make these
proto-organisms gradually more powerful over their whole reproductive
cycles by altering the bundle of structural causes — shaping each
structural cause to be as effective as possible in determining some
amino acid, adding new structural causes when the amino acid they add
makes the chain more power, and fitting those structural causes
together harmoniously as parts of a single RNA — so that the RNA
molecule eventually has maximum power over the whole cycle. But
maximum holistic power for an RNA molecule is just whatever power
comes from the kind of protein it produces existing in the
neighborhood. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Even
if evolution began with a single variety of RNA whose protein did
some useful work, evolutionary change would not stop at making its
protein as powerful as possible, because some random variations on
existing RNA would synthesize proteins that controlled other relevant
conditions. If the first kind of protein supplied nucleotides for RNA
synthesis, there are surely random variations on its RNA template
whose slightly different protein molecules would supply other kinds
of nucleotides, or supply the same kinds of nucleotides in from other
sources. Again, random variations on existing RNA that happened to
control some new condition affecting RNA reproduction would be more
likely to succeed in reproducing, because their location in the
region would make the more likely to benefit. Thus, from the original
RNA molecule(s) would evolve a variety of RNA molecules serving as
templates for proteins with different functions, and each would
become maximally powerful in serving its function.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif">N<img src="" name="TtsOtkCRS01_10" align="right" hspace="5" width="275" height="23" border="0">atural
selection at the group level.</font> The increasing diversity of RNA
molecules would make their combination in local regions an ecology,
and the most spectacular accomplishments of the first stage of
evolution, such as a more efficient and reliable process of
synthesizing proteins, would come from the increasing power of the
ecology as a whole. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Natural
selection would not be very selective at first. Though RNA whose
proteins controlled some relevant conditions would be more likely to
reproduce because they would be in the right location to benefit from
the protein, other nearby RNA would also tend to benefit. But once
there were enough different kinds of RNA whose proteins making
different contributions to the reproduction of them all, change in
the direction of maximum holistic power at the ecological level would
be accelerated by a weak form of reproductive causation at the level
of local ecologies. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Different
local ecologies would be like different higher level organisms trying
out different combinations of RNA. Each local region would contain
various kinds of RNA, synthesizing various kinds of proteins, and
they would all be driven through cycles of reproduction by the cycle
of night and day side by side in the water. The varieties of RNA
would be like the many structural causes “bundled together” like
a higher level organism, for the proteins synthesized by all of them
would tend to <i>jointly </i>control conditions in their local region
that affected the reproduction of them all. And such ecologies of RNA
molecules would also be able to reproduce as a whole, like higher
level organisms, because when storms or other major disturbances
scattered molecules to new local regions, and RNA that wound up in
favorable circumstances where they could have both structural effects
would start new colonies. Colonies with the right combinations of
varieties of RNA would generate proteins of different kinds whose
joint control of conditions affecting the reproductive of them all
would make their populations of RNA grow faster. Thus, when the next
storm came along, the more powerful combinations of RNA molecules
would tend to populate the favorable locations when more normal
conditions resumed. Random variations in bundling RNA together would
be introduced by the reproduction of such “higher level organisms,”
because the varieties of RNA that would wind up together in any given
local region would be a mixture of varieties of RNA from several
local regions. Since there are only so many favorable locations for
such colonies of RNA to be set up, their reproduction would
eventually make free energy scarce, and a natural selection would be
made by the greater reproductive success of some whole colonies. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
relative lack of selectivity about natural selection at the level of
individual RNA molecules would, therefore, make possible a powerful
form of group selection, which would make the combination of
different varieties of RNA in each region as powerful as possible as
a whole in controlling all the conditions that affect RNA
reproduction generally. Since random variations at the level of these
higher level “ecological organisms” are made possible by how they
are made up of RNA molecules as parts, there are three ways in which
random variations may make them more powerful as a whole. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">The first
kind of change that occurs at the higher level of part-whole
complexity (the local regions where RNA exists side-by-side in space)
is the gradual change in each variety of RNA that shapes its protein
to perform its function as effectively as possible. This is the
gradual change described at the outset of this description of the
gradual evolution of RNA, which itself involves three kinds of change
because each RNA molecules is a bundle of structural causes, with
each triplet of nucleotide determining the amino acid for some
location in its protein molecule. Random variations on the RNA
molecule that synthesizes it would try out variations on the protein,
and the more effective varieties would tend to be the ones that
succeed in reproducing, because they would be located in the local
region where the condition was controlled and so there would be more
of them to be scattered to new regions when a storm or other
disturbance occurred.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Second, new
varieties of RNA would be added to the colony when random variations
on existing RNA happen to synthesize a protein that controls some new
condition that affects their reproduction (or some old condition in a
new way). Not only would it tend to be selected within the colony by
its greater likelihood of being located where the proteins benefit
was provided, but it would eventually be added to the mix in other
local regions. To take an extreme example, suppose that it alleviated
some bottleneck in the process affecting them all. That would make
all the RNA in the local region would be more successful in
reproducing, and there would be more RNA from that colony to scatter
to new local regions when the next storm came.</font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Third, the
useful proteins that were being synthesized would also be shaped to
work together as harmoniously and efficiently as possible with other
proteins in local regions, because the reproduction of all the RNA
molecules in the neighborhood is the joint result of the proteins
synthesized by all the RNA. Thus, as different combinations of RNA
molecules were tried out in different regions, those combinations
that worked together most harmoniously and even assisted one another
would tend to succeed, while less harmonious combinations would fail,
because there would be more of them to scatter to new regions when
storms or other disturbances occurred. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Reproductive
causation was still weak, but since it was operating on the level of
whole ecologies of RNA as well as on each variety of RNA within a
local region, there would be an increase in the power of whole
colonies of RNA to control conditions that affect the reproduction of
them all. Although RNA molecules start off simple, weak and uniform,
their stage of gradual evolution would eventually make them complex,
powerful and diverse. Indeed, this would happen to whole colonies of
RNA, because insofar as there is a range of different favorable
locations for them, different combinations of RNA would evolve to tap
the free energy available in all of them. The surface of a planet
surely makes it possible for RNA molecules to go through reproductive
cycles on a sufficiently large scale to try out all the random
variations on existing RNA that are possible, and thus, each new
relevant condition that could be controlled would be brought under
control as it became possible. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 1.27cm; margin-right: 2.54cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt"><font face="Verdana, sans-serif">M<img src="" name="TtsOtkCRS01_11" align="right" hspace="5" width="275" height="21" border="0">ore
efficient and reliable protein synthesis.</font> It is not necessary
to trace the whole course of the gradual evolution of RNA, but it is
worth mentioning what is probably its most significant contribution
to subsequent evolution, namely, an efficient and reliable way of
synthesizing protein molecules. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">The
original process by which RNA molecules synthesized the proteins that
brought the first relevant conditions under control (such as
supplying energy-rich parts for RNA replication) was probably weak
and inefficient. The power to control relevant conditions of all
kinds would have been greatly increased, therefore, by random
variations whose proteins made the synthesis of proteins more
reliable or powerful. There are many ways it could have been
improved, including changes that expanded the kinds of amino acids
that could be used. The first improvements may have been proteins
that helped line up amino acids with the RNA and a substratum so that
the protein chain was more likely to form. Such changes could have
had far reaching effects, because it could give a function to
previously useless proteins that were relatively abundant because
they were so simple that they were continually being tried out,
eventually selecting the RNA molecules that synthesized them. But the
nature of the primitive means of protein synthesis is obscure, and
the reason could be that major changes occurred its early evolution.</font></font></font></p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">One
indication that the original way of having a structural effect in
addition to reproduction involved the synthesis of amino acids is
that the successive bases, which are the information-carrying face of
nucleotides, can be held together in chains by amino acids as well as
by the phosphates used in RNA (and DNA). Such chains of amino acids
are called &quot;peptides,&quot; the chain that carries these bases
are called PNA (rtaher than RNA or DNA). It means that amino acids
interact with the molecules by which nucleotides determine which kind
of amino acid to attach next in a way that could have occurred
without the elaborate molecular machinery now used. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">An
example of a major evolutionary change would be the addition or
deletion of the kinds of nucleic acids used. Protein synthesis may
originally have involved only two or three nucleic acids and others
were added as special proteins evolved that enabled them to use new
kinds of amino acids in the proteins being synthesized. Or it may
originally have used kinds of nucleic acids that interact more
readily with amino acids and they subsequently dropped out when
proteins evolved that enabled fewer nucleic acids to determine the
amino acid to be added. It may even be possible that the original
code used only two nucleic acids to identify which of the amino acids
then being used were to be added, and later, assisted by new
proteins, it was replaced by the three-nucleotide code found in
existing living objects. But whatever the major changes were that
occurred early in its evolution, they not only made it possible for
RNA molecules to do their work more reliably and efficiently, but
probably also increased the variety of amino acids used in
constructing proteins from the few kinds that were probably involved
at first to the twenty or so kinds of amino acids found in living
objects. </font></font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 3.81cm; margin-right: 2.03cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif">Only 20 or
so kinds of amino acids are used in synthesizing proteins, but they
were selected from the enormous variety of amino acids that was
availabe at the time. What singled these amino acids out was
presumably that they provided enough variety for sequences of them to
serve as all the kinds of molecular machines needed to handle other
molecules. There is probably a geometrical aspect to the amino acids
used that enables them to be combined in all the basic ways required
to construct complex structural causes, and when it is explained, the
currently intractable problem of predicing the conformations of
proteins from their amino-acid sequence will have largely been
solved. </font></font>
</p>
<p lang="en-US" align="left" style="margin-left: 2.54cm; margin-right: 1.27cm; text-indent: 0cm; margin-top: 0.49cm; margin-bottom: 0.49cm; line-height: 100%; widows: 0; orphans: 0">
<font color="#000000"><font face="Times New Roman, serif"><font size="3" style="font-size: 12pt">Though
the addition of new proteins to assist the process of protein
synthesis would make such major changes possible, they would, at the
same time, make the link between the nucleotides and amino acids more
indirect. That would explain how the primitive way of synthesizing
proteins evolved into its current, complex form. Even in the simplest
forms of life on earth, protein synthesis depends on the interaction
of RNA molecules with a complex machine composed of as many as
fifty-five different protein molecules and three RNA molecules.
&quot;Ribosomes&quot;, as they are called, assemble themselves
automatically in water because of their geometrical structures and
how weak forces located on them bind them together. And they can
consume only amino acids that have been attached as parts of tRNA
molecules. But little is known about how ribosomes works, and when it
is worked lut, there may well be empirical proof that original way in
which RNA structural effects for doing non-reproductive work was a
direct interaction between RNA and amino acids that linked them
together in short chains.</font></font></font></p>
</body>
</html>