REFACTOR: Explanatory Core Architecture & Terminology Alignment
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
|
||||
#+TITLE: Root Cause Analysis: System 2 Bouncer & Authorization Gate
|
||||
#+TITLE: Root Cause Analysis: Deterministic Engine Bouncer & Authorization Gate
|
||||
#+DATE: 2026-04-11
|
||||
#+FILETAGS: :rca:bouncer:authorization:psf:security:
|
||||
|
||||
* Executive Summary
|
||||
Implemented the "Planning Mode" Bouncer to intercept high-risk System 1 proposals (e.g., shell commands, Lisp evaluation). The system now forces these actions into an asynchronous "Flight Plan" Org node for manual Sovereign approval, fulfilling the "everything is a node" and high-integrity mandates.
|
||||
Implemented the "Planning Mode" Bouncer to intercept high-risk Probabilistic Engine proposals (e.g., shell commands, Lisp evaluation). The system now forces these actions into an asynchronous "Flight Plan" Org node for manual Sovereign approval, fulfilling the "everything is a node" and high-integrity mandates.
|
||||
|
||||
* 1. Issue: Automated High-Risk Execution
|
||||
** Symptoms
|
||||
System 1 proposals involving `shell` or `eval` were executed immediately upon passing the `decide` gate's safety harness. This lacked human-in-the-loop oversight for irreversible or complex operations.
|
||||
Probabilistic Engine proposals involving `shell` or `eval` were executed immediately upon passing the `decide` gate's safety harness. This lacked human-in-the-loop oversight for irreversible or complex operations.
|
||||
** Root Cause
|
||||
Architecture gap. The system lacked an authorization state between "Safe" and "Executed".
|
||||
** Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user