REFACTOR: Explanatory Core Architecture & Terminology Alignment
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,17 +3,17 @@
|
||||
#+FILETAGS: :rca:orchestrator:consensus:integrity:
|
||||
|
||||
* Executive Summary
|
||||
The implementation of Consolidation VI (Task Orchestrator) aimed to introduce parallel multi-backend consensus, GTD task integrity, and delegation. During the build, a critical dependency failure was identified in the `safety-harness` module.
|
||||
The implementation of Consolidation VI (Task Orchestrator) aimed to introduce parallel multi-backend consensus, GTD task integrity, and delegation. During the build, a critical dependency failure was identified in the `lisp-validator` module.
|
||||
|
||||
* 1. Issue: Undefined `SAFETY-HARNESS-VALIDATE`
|
||||
** Symptoms
|
||||
Existing `SAFETY-SUITE` tests failed with `#<UNDEFINED-FUNCTION SAFETY-HARNESS-VALIDATE>`.
|
||||
** Root Cause
|
||||
The function `safety-harness-validate` was exported in `package.lisp` but never actually defined in `safety-harness.lisp`. Only the internal recursive walker `safety-harness-ast-walk` existed. This represents a "Hollow Export" bug where the interface was designed but the implementation was truncated or skipped in a previous session.
|
||||
The function `lisp-validator-validate` was exported in `package.lisp` but never actually defined in `lisp-validator.lisp`. Only the internal recursive walker `lisp-validator-ast-walk` existed. This represents a "Hollow Export" bug where the interface was designed but the implementation was truncated or skipped in a previous session.
|
||||
** Resolution
|
||||
Defined `safety-harness-validate` as a wrapper around `read-from-string` and `safety-harness-ast-walk`.
|
||||
Defined `lisp-validator-validate` as a wrapper around `read-from-string` and `lisp-validator-ast-walk`.
|
||||
|
||||
* 2. Design Decision: Deliberate Consensus
|
||||
* 2. Design Decision: Deterministic Consensus
|
||||
** Requirement
|
||||
Multi-backend support to reduce hallucinations and increase reliability.
|
||||
** Solution
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user