security: contracts + tests for all 5 security modules (87→123 checks)

lisp/security-policy.lisp

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+(in-package :passepartout)
+
 (defun policy-compliance-check (action context)
   "Enforces constitutional invariants on proposed actions."
   (declare (ignore context))
@@ -15,3 +17,34 @@
   :priority 500
   :trigger (lambda (ctx) (declare (ignore ctx)) t)
   :deterministic #'policy-compliance-check)
+
+(eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+  (ql:quickload :fiveam :silent t))
+
+(defpackage :passepartout-security-policy-tests
+  (:use :cl :fiveam :passepartout)
+  (:export #:policy-suite))
+
+(in-package :passepartout-security-policy-tests)
+
+(def-suite policy-suite :description "Verification of the Constitutional Policy Layer")
+(in-suite policy-suite)
+
+(test test-policy-passes-valid-explanation
+  "Contract 1: action with sufficient explanation passes through unchanged."
+  (let* ((action '(:type :REQUEST :payload (:action :read :explanation "The user asked me to read the TODO list for today.")))
+         (result (policy-compliance-check action nil)))
+    (is (equal action result))))
+
+(test test-policy-rejects-short-explanation
+  "Contract 1: action with explanation ≤10 characters is rejected with :LOG."
+  (let* ((action '(:type :REQUEST :payload (:action :read :explanation "hi")))
+         (result (policy-compliance-check action nil)))
+    (is (eq :LOG (getf result :type)))
+    (is (search "blocked" (getf (getf result :payload) :text) :test #'char-equal))))
+
+(test test-policy-rejects-missing-explanation
+  "Contract 1: action without :explanation is rejected."
+  (let* ((action '(:type :REQUEST :payload (:action :read)))
+         (result (policy-compliance-check action nil)))
+    (is (eq :LOG (getf result :type)))))