- Moved everything from ideas/passepartout/ to projects/passepartout/ - Moved legal structures to projects/flags/ - Created missing _index.org files for all subdirectories - Stripped redundant passepartout- prefix from filenames - Rewrote root _index.org as generalized brain index (projects + concepts) - Updated Hugo nav to Projects/Concepts - Updated build script section descriptions - Deleted stale ideas/passepartout-economics.md orphan
36 lines
1.7 KiB
Org Mode
36 lines
1.7 KiB
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: 03ebdb80-a9af-4e76-a443-8556424996ed
|
|
:ID: auto-fatf
|
|
:CREATED: [2026-05-23 Sat]
|
|
:END:
|
|
#+title: FATF (Financial Action Task Force)
|
|
#+filetags: :passepartout:compliance:framework:fatf:
|
|
|
|
risk-weight mapping correctness. A $100K/yr Basel gate package for a G-SIB
|
|
is a trivial expense relative to the capital requirement penalty of getting the
|
|
mapping wrong.
|
|
|
|
** FATF (Financial Action Task Force) — AML/CFT Standards
|
|
|
|
International standard-setter for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism
|
|
financing. 40 Recommendations covering: risk assessment, customer due diligence
|
|
(CDD), beneficial ownership transparency, suspicious transaction reporting,
|
|
targeted financial sanctions, proliferation financing. National implementation
|
|
varies by jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Who must comply: Financial institutions, DNFBPs (designated non-financial
|
|
businesses and professions), virtual asset service providers (VASPs). In
|
|
practice: every bank, money service business, crypto exchange, and high-value
|
|
dealer globally.
|
|
|
|
Penalties: National enforcement varies. Systemic failures lead to FATF grey-list
|
|
(monitoring) or black-list (counter-measures). Grey-listing increases transaction
|
|
costs — Iran and North Korea are black-listed.
|
|
|
|
Why it matters: FATF's CDD requirements are the most widespread and
|
|
rule-complex compliance obligation globally. The gate stack can encode
|
|
tiered CDD rules, prove that every customer onboarding followed the correct
|
|
verification path, and produce an auditable trail for every suspicion report. First-mover advantage is significant — no vendor offers verifiable AML gate automation at scale.
|
|
|
|
Part of the [[id:e4a7b3d2-1c9f-4b6e-8a2d-5f3c7e1b9a0c][compliance framework index]].
|