22 lines
1.8 KiB
Org Mode
22 lines
1.8 KiB
Org Mode
---
|
|
title: The Chosen Path: Option 4, Starting with Option 5
|
|
type: reference
|
|
tags: :passepartout:architecture:
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
* The Chosen Path: Option 4, Starting with Option 5
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: b21917d8-cb6e-4959-96c0-9326b0611134
|
|
:ID: design-chosen-path
|
|
:CREATED: [2026-05-08 Fri]
|
|
:WEIGHT: 40
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
The one-memex-two-indices architecture (Option 4) is the correct long-term architecture. The prose is the ground truth. The symbolic index is a derived view that can be rebuilt. The neural index handles what the symbolic index cannot — semantic search, fuzzy matching, associative leaps.
|
|
|
|
But committing to a persistence format before knowing what facts are useful is premature. The practical path starts with Option 5 (ephemeral facts) as the Phase 1-4 implementation, then graduates to Option 4 with VivaceGraph persistence in Phase 5 when the fact language has been battle-tested through months of gate outcomes, Screamer deductions, and LLM proposals.
|
|
|
|
*** Why the dual index is permanent, not transitional
|
|
|
|
In the coding domain, there is an aspiration that the symbolic index could eventually capture enough of the prose's propositional content to become a complete representation — the "flip" where the symbolic engine reverses the flow. But for the broader memex (literature, poetry, personal reflection, daily logs), completeness is neither possible nor desirable. You cannot formalize what makes a poem beautiful. You cannot extract a triple that captures the emotional weight of a diary entry. The neural index will always be the gateway to the full richness of the prose. The symbolic index handles what can be mechanically verified: citations, entities, temporal order, contradictions, provenance. The division of labor between the two indices is permanent because the domains they serve are fundamentally different kinds of knowledge.
|