Files
hermes-brain/ideas/passepartout-economics/investment-thesis.org
Hermes 303e8c6306 Convert cross-references from [[id:uuid]] to [[file:name.org]]
All 117 inter-node links now use [[file:node-name.org][title]] format
which renders as clickable hyperlinks in both Emacs (C-c C-o) and
web-based org renderers (Gitea, GitHub). Each node retains its :ID:
UUID property for Emacs org-roam database features (backlinks,
capturing, node-find).

Prev format: [[id:uuid][title]] — Emacs only, dead text on web
New format:  [[file:name.org][title]] — works everywhere
2026-05-21 19:40:54 +00:00

1.5 KiB

Investment Thesis

The early player benefits from every other instance of the triad. Every deployed instance feeds edge cases into the regression suite, grows the compute marketplace, and validates the hardware designs. Network effects are positive sum.

Three revenue horizons:

  • Low-hanging fruit (year one, $2M-$12M): verification appliances, domain gate rule subscriptions, evaluation harness certification, migration services
  • Medium-term (1-3 years, $10M-$50M): compute marketplace, Relay Network, Lisp Machine hardware; premium usernames ($10M/yr), PDS hosting ($18M/yr)
  • Big money (3-10 years, $100M-$1B+): verification monopoly (UL certification for AI), infrastructure lock-in, planetary compute marketplace

The switching costs compound. The network effects are positive sum. The market is nearly a trillion dollars.

The defensible entity is "the organization that best understands how to adapt Passepartout to your domain" — not "the organization that owns Passepartout."

See also: Verification appliance, Domain gate packages, Evaluation harness, Agora usernames, PDS as a service, Verification monopoly, Infrastructure lock-in, Moats