9b2be10c77
Replace monolithic passepartout-economics.org with directory of org-roam style nodes, each with :ID: property and cross-references using [[id:uuid][title]] format. 27 nodes organized by theme: - Core: index, triad overview, agora, stoa - Revenue: verification appliance, domain gate packages, evaluation harness, skill marketplace, agora usernames, PDS service, compute marketplace - Strategy: investment thesis, moats, licensing, patents, AI industry impact - Analysis: lisp economics, sufficiency flip, time estimates, cost structure, gate rule encoding, upgrade lifecycle, biology parallels, symbolics comparison - Big money: verification monopoly, infrastructure lock-in Old file kept as archive with redirect links to new structure.
17 lines
1.0 KiB
Org Mode
17 lines
1.0 KiB
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: 0b5a8a74-cfd6-542d-bc88-4eb3cd8626f9
|
|
:END:
|
|
#+title: Cost Structure — Zero Marginal Cost
|
|
#+filetags: :passepartout:economics:cost:marginal:zero:
|
|
|
|
- **One-time cost:** gate-rule encoding for a domain (from hours for codified domains up to months for tacit domains)
|
|
- **Near-zero marginal cost:** ACL2 proof + Screamer consistency check + VivaceGraph lookup per interaction — all CPU-native, all in-image
|
|
- **No recurring LLM API costs** for the 80% symbolic reasoning layer
|
|
- **After sufficiency flip:** pennies per day vs dollars per day for LLM-only
|
|
|
|
The cost curve inverts: generation is expensive, verification is cheap. This is the inversion Passepartout exploits.
|
|
|
|
Token demand shifts from "every interaction burns tokens" to "only unfamiliar interactions burn tokens." Steady-state per-user LLM consumption drops by an order of magnitude.
|
|
|
|
See also: [[id:9af13fff-9725-542b-93b1-a555bc74ad72][Lisp economics]], [[id:45ea493b-94ad-5885-aa65-0c846e5c3c1d][Gate rule encoding]], [[id:efc76898-03f7-57ba-923d-35d65da88bb7][Sufficiency flip]]
|