- Split competitive-analysis-2026-05.org → TOC + 9 competitor files in ideas/competitors/. Dropped date from filename. All competitor UUIDs generated, TOC keeps original UUID for backlink continuity. - Deleted passepartout-economics.org archive (replaced by 27-node KB). - Inlined 5 'See also' blocks into natural prose (compliance-index, first-mover-window, revenue-table, orders-of-magnitude-time, native-org-knowledge-base). - Linked 7 orphan compliance pages back to compliance index + finished truncated sentences. - Linked all 14 Agora requirement docs from topic-relevant pages (identity→lisp-machine-security, infrastructure→compute-marketplace, social-space→growth-strategy, exchange→agora-contracts, etc.). - Linked ai-industry-impact from investment-thesis, sufficiency-flip, verification-appliance, effects-growth-flywheel (up from 1 to 10+ pages). - Fixed CREATED timestamps to use git commit dates instead of today. - Made all links absolute from root (no port inheritance). - Removed stale agora/docs/ duplicate content.
56 lines
2.5 KiB
Org Mode
56 lines
2.5 KiB
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: 513d5996-4ac7-4567-a992-18fc01599104
|
|
:ID: auto-gdpr
|
|
:CREATED: [2026-05-23 Sat]
|
|
:END:
|
|
#+title: GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
|
|
#+filetags: :passepartout:compliance:framework:gdpr:
|
|
|
|
* GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
|
|
|
|
** What it is
|
|
|
|
EU regulation (effective May 2018) governing the processing of personal data of
|
|
natural persons in the EU. Extraterritorial — applies to any organization
|
|
processing EU personal data regardless of where the organization is based.
|
|
|
|
Key requirements:
|
|
- Lawful basis for processing (consent, contract, legal obligation, vital
|
|
interests, public task, legitimate interests)
|
|
- Data minimization — collect only what is necessary
|
|
- Purpose limitation — do not reuse data for incompatible purposes
|
|
- Storage limitation — delete when no longer needed
|
|
- Right of access, rectification, erasure (right to be forgotten),
|
|
data portability, restriction, objection
|
|
- Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for high-risk processing
|
|
- Breach notification within 72 hours to supervisory authority
|
|
- Data Protection Officer (DPO) appointment for certain controllers/processors
|
|
- Data Processing Agreements (DPAs) between controllers and processors
|
|
|
|
** Who must comply
|
|
|
|
Any organization that processes personal data of EU residents. Includes
|
|
controllers (determine purposes and means) and processors (process on behalf
|
|
of controller). Non-EU organizations with EU data subjects are in scope.
|
|
|
|
** Penalties
|
|
|
|
Up to 20M EUR or 4% of annual global turnover, whichever is higher. Tiered
|
|
system. Supervisory authorities in each member state enforce. Private right
|
|
of action for damages.
|
|
|
|
** Why it matters for the triad
|
|
|
|
GDPR is the most extraterritorial and aggressively enforced privacy framework.
|
|
The gate stack's principle of least privilege maps naturally to GDPR's data
|
|
minimization requirement. Every data access is gated by a verified rule that
|
|
states the purpose — the proof log is a built-in DPIA artifact. For the
|
|
[[id:3c6b0449-a8fb-5b89-b82a-34efb21ef5b5][compute marketplace]]: a provider processing proofs on EU users' gate data must
|
|
maintain DPAs with all clients. Proof logs themselves may constitute personal
|
|
data if they reference natural persons (names in access rules, etc.), creating
|
|
a demand for privacy-preserving proof techniques. This is why the
|
|
[[id:c34940cc-090e-57c4-8020-e78b1d32b96c][GDPR gate package]] includes data-processing agreement templates and
|
|
purpose-boundary gate rules that are independently verified by the provider's
|
|
[[id:45258a2d-1675-562c-9024-5d1eb2f1ea56][evaluation harness]].
|
|
|