6e992cc0c5
- Rename 'three-pronged' folder to 'knowledge-layers' — prong metaphor
was misleading (implied parallel tines), replaced with epistemic layers
(deductive base, empirical middle, probabilistic oracle — vertical stack)
- Collapse 11 overlapping files into 3 coherent documents:
- knowledge-layers/_index.org: core framework (two engines + one store,
World Model formula, 0-14 layer table, provenance store design,
conflict resolution, cold-start, stage mapping)
- knowledge-layers/practical-implications.org: design-world-aware-of-
physics, 10 powers, Schafmeister existence proof, epistemic transparency
- knowledge-layers/neurological-empirical.org: neural networks in
provenance framework (kept intact)
- Relocate wolfram/mathematica and Schafmeister docs to ideas/viability/
- Integrate into main architecture _index.org:
- Gate: expanded from two vectors (ACL2+LLM) to three (deductive,
provenance/empirical, LLM oracle)
- Autodidactic loop: split into Track 1 (deductive hardening, fast)
and Track 2 (empirical validation, slow, experimental-feedback-driven)
- See also: added Knowledge Layers cross-reference
- Add all-lisp geometry engine note (ideas/lisp-geometry-engine.org) as
concrete illustration of the empirical layer's effect on design work
- Rebuild site: 148 files, 0 errors
31 lines
1.5 KiB
Org Mode
31 lines
1.5 KiB
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: 4eef0993-6671-41cf-ba20-d1443a3ec49d
|
|
:ID: auto-basel-iii
|
|
:CREATED: [2026-05-23 Sat]
|
|
:END:
|
|
#+title: Basel III
|
|
#+filetags: :passepartout:compliance:framework:basel:
|
|
|
|
** Basel III (Bank for International Settlements — Basel Committee)
|
|
|
|
International banking regulatory framework (BIS Basel Committee). Sets minimum
|
|
capital requirements, liquidity coverage ratio (LCR), net stable funding ratio
|
|
(NSFR), leverage ratio, and counterparty credit risk requirements. National
|
|
implementation via local regulators (Federal Reserve, ECB, PRA, BOJ, etc.).
|
|
|
|
Who must comply: All internationally active banks. Systemically important
|
|
financial institutions (G-SIBs) face additional surcharges.
|
|
|
|
Penalties: Capital adequacy violations trigger regulatory intervention at
|
|
increasing severity — restrictions on dividends, mandatory capital raising,
|
|
management replacement, resolution.
|
|
|
|
Why it matters: Basel's risk-weight calculation is rule-heavy and
|
|
verification-friendly. The gate stack can encode credit risk weight mappings
|
|
and produce auditable proof that capital calculations follow the correct
|
|
methodology. First-mover advantage: Basel compliance is done via spreadsheets
|
|
and specialized risk platforms. No platform uses formal verification for
|
|
risk-weight mapping correctness. A $100K/yr Basel gate package for a G-SIB is a trivial expense relative to the capital requirement penalty of getting the mapping wrong.
|
|
|
|
Part of the [[id:e4a7b3d2-1c9f-4b6e-8a2d-5f3c7e1b9a0c][compliance framework index]].
|