50 lines
1.1 KiB
Org Mode
50 lines
1.1 KiB
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: 73aa0a7e-245f-4aa4-b79f-83c6cbcee4b4
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
#+title: 2012-03-07
|
|
|
|
* Ramy Raoof Geneva Statement :EIPR:privacy:
|
|
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:CREATED: [2012-03-07 Wed 10:27]
|
|
:MODIFIED: [2012-03-08 Thu 14:11]
|
|
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
|
Substance
|
|
|
|
I would have loved to have been part of the consultation, especially it was hours before
|
|
|
|
Ramy met with
|
|
|
|
APEC
|
|
|
|
ACCESS: Brett Solomon
|
|
|
|
Austria
|
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
|
|
Sweden
|
|
|
|
What is it trying to achieve? Why is kill switch and profiling and data protection a priority for us?
|
|
|
|
How does the profiling and data protection recommendation flow from the statement?
|
|
|
|
Profiling: We have the document originals
|
|
|
|
Finfisher is not a priority
|
|
|
|
Companies not specified
|
|
|
|
Does not meet the discourse we are trying to develop in Egypt. Egypt is still pushing for a kill switch article. It is more useful to distinguish between administration and using the kill switch.
|
|
|
|
Not coordianted with GNI, Access Now, EFF
|
|
|
|
We could have gotten with a call for accountability at mother countries
|
|
|
|
Language: قطع تام للإنترنت (فقط)
|