150 lines
3.3 KiB
Org Mode
150 lines
3.3 KiB
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: 0cc72fcf-38eb-414f-b0e9-51931e9adcbe
|
|
:END:
|
|
#+title: 2016-08-15
|
|
|
|
* Academic Writing :academia:CSLA:@personal:
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:CREATED: [2016-08-15 Mon 06:36]
|
|
:MODIFIED: [2016-08-17 Wed 08:22]
|
|
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
(with Anna McMurry)
|
|
|
|
Outline
|
|
|
|
Requirements for outline
|
|
|
|
outline or bullet format, not a narrative
|
|
|
|
sentence outline (not a topic outline)
|
|
|
|
includes research question and/or thesis statement
|
|
|
|
indicates where sources will be inserted
|
|
|
|
Due Thurs 18 Aug, to AW instructor by 1400
|
|
|
|
The present tense is favourable for outlines
|
|
|
|
Outline of a theoretical research paper
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
Background (relevance, research niche, gap)
|
|
|
|
Research Question
|
|
|
|
Argumentative thesis
|
|
|
|
Method of analysis and justifications
|
|
|
|
Background (in more detail than in the introduction)
|
|
|
|
scope
|
|
|
|
Definistion
|
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
|
Theoretical Framework (description, definitions, justifications)
|
|
|
|
Arguments (Analysis)
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
|
|
Annotated Bibliography
|
|
|
|
This is an organised list of sources (references cited)
|
|
|
|
Each annotation should consist of two paragraphs--the first paragraph objectively summarizing the source, and the second paragraph discussing its relevance and appropriateness to your research paper
|
|
|
|
Why?
|
|
|
|
To review the literature on a particular subject
|
|
|
|
to illustrate the quality of research that you have done
|
|
|
|
to provide examples of the types of sources available
|
|
|
|
to describe other items on a topic that may be of interest to the reader
|
|
|
|
to explore the subject
|
|
|
|
What should an annotation include?
|
|
|
|
Summary
|
|
|
|
What kind of course is it?
|
|
|
|
What is the text's main theses?
|
|
|
|
What main issues/topics are covered?
|
|
|
|
How does the author support his/her argument?
|
|
|
|
What key concepts/ideas does the text introduce?
|
|
|
|
Evaluation of the source
|
|
|
|
How might the source be useful for you?
|
|
|
|
How does it relate to your research question and/or argument
|
|
|
|
How does it relate to the other sources?
|
|
|
|
How reliable is it? Does it contain signs of bias?
|
|
|
|
How might it help you support your argument?
|
|
|
|
Using sources for a variety of purposes
|
|
|
|
To provide background information/context
|
|
|
|
To explain important key terms/concepts
|
|
|
|
To provide evidence that will support your argument
|
|
|
|
To lend weight/authority to your argument
|
|
|
|
To offer alternative viewpoints/opposing arguments
|
|
|
|
Annotated Bibliography Guidelines
|
|
|
|
No more than one source from your social sciences reader
|
|
|
|
No more than one non-academic source (Government/NGO website)
|
|
|
|
At least two sources from academic journals or books
|
|
|
|
No more than one source in a language other than English
|
|
|
|
Use Harvard citation style
|
|
|
|
Approximately two pages 1.5/2.0 spaced
|
|
|
|
Each annotation should consist of two paragraphs
|
|
|
|
Cizre, Ü. & Yeldan, E. 2005, 'The Turkish encounter with neo-liberalism: economics and politics in the 2000/2001 crises', Review of International Political Economy, vol. 12, issue 3. Available from Taylor & Francis [15 August 2016].
|
|
|
|
* Research Methods :academia:CSLA:@personal:
|
|
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:CREATED: [2016-08-15 Mon 09:40]
|
|
:MODIFIED: [2016-08-15 Mon 10:20]
|
|
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
Inductive method: building the theory out of the data (grounded theory)
|
|
|
|
Deductive method: testing a theory you already have with the data
|
|
|
|
* Migration :academia:CSLA:@personal:
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:CREATED: [2016-08-15 Mon 14:29]
|
|
:MODIFIED: [2016-08-15 Mon 14:30]
|
|
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
|
:END:
|
|
|