34 lines
986 B
Org Mode
34 lines
986 B
Org Mode
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:ID: b5cfa25e-c462-4679-aba0-f54df2418768
|
|
:END:
|
|
#+title: 2016-11-02
|
|
|
|
* Philosophy of Social Sciences :academia:UoN:
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:CREATED: [2016-11-02 Wed 09:23]
|
|
:MODIFIED: [2016-11-02 Wed]
|
|
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
Methodological individualism is a further restriction, to
|
|
|
|
Essay
|
|
|
|
Every single question is a controversy and a debate
|
|
|
|
Each question is asking you to give an account and evaluate controversy and the debate. There are 2 sides. You will have to decide which order to present those two sides. The order is determined in part by your conclusion, usually the one presented last.
|
|
|
|
John is a great believer in dividing the essay into sections
|
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
Context
|
|
|
|
A position 1 (main points, subsidiary consequences)
|
|
|
|
B critical alternative (reverse position, end up with main points, like a punchline in a joke)
|
|
|
|
C Conclusion linking back to the title, which is the question
|
|
|
|
How do rational actors theorists account for the existence of social groups?
|