Amr Gharbeia
4e9431ec1d
passepartout v0.7.2 (Gate Trace + HITL + Search + 11 more features): - Gate trace visualization with Ctrl+G toggle - HITL inline panels with styled collapse on approve/deny - Agent identity file + /identity command - Safe-tool read-only allowlist - Message search mode with Up/Down nav and highlights - Context budget visibility with section breakdown - Session rewind /sessions /resume /rewind - Undo/redo per operation - Context debugging /context why /context dropped - Tool hardening (timeouts, write verify, read-only cache) - Tag stack severity tiers + trigger counts - Merkle provenance audit + audit-verify - Self-help /help <topic> reads USER_MANUAL.org - Live CONFIG section in system prompts - Pads: Page Up/Down scroll by 10 lines Core 92/92 TUI Main 104/104 TUI View 29/29 Neuro 13/13
40 lines
2.0 KiB
Org Mode
40 lines
2.0 KiB
Org Mode
#+TITLE: Governance of decentralised infrastructures :academia:UoN:@personal:
|
|
#+FILETAGS: :atomic:note:
|
|
|
|
* Governance of decentralised infrastructures :academia:UoN:@personal:
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:CREATED: e7b3a859-9ff0-43fb-afee-b9d69aedc446
|
|
:SOURCE: /home/user/memex/daily/2016-12-05.org
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
:CREATED: [2016-12-05 Mon 21:02]
|
|
:MODIFIED: [2016-12-05 Mon 21:02]
|
|
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
|
|
|
The futility of trying to regulate decentralised infrastructures is
|
|
evident, particularly as the infrastructures become both more secret and
|
|
anonymous, using strong cryptography.
|
|
|
|
Regulating traditional, centralised infrastructures relied on due process, which is in the final analysis a singularity, a monopoly of power to coerce. Indeed a singularity to break the law.
|
|
|
|
In decentralised systems based on software, 'code is law'. Trying to
|
|
regulate decentralised domains in the same, traditional way is harmful
|
|
to progress, while also being a distraction away from the type of
|
|
regulation suitable for a decentralised infrastructure. Monopoly on the
|
|
power to coerce, to break the law, is the direction where policing
|
|
should focus. Trying to maintain a monopoly, or at least strong
|
|
advantage, on the power to coercion in traditional domains, can be
|
|
paralleled by trying to maintain a monopoly, or at least a strong
|
|
advantage on breaking code in the new, decentralised domains. While
|
|
being itself subject to regulation, the state should try to stop
|
|
regulated decentralised domains, and focus on being the strongest code
|
|
breaker.
|
|
|
|
As coloured coins continue to be lost or stolen, while deed holders continue to hold possession of property, smart property contracts will become less relevant in a blockchain and a new blockchain will need to be created (every Sabbath?) Or human overrides, vested in a sovereign or a judge or a jury, will need to be introduced.
|
|
|
|
Smart contracts move us forward but towards a commerce system that corresponds more to common law contracts than statutes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Backlinks
|
|
- Source: [[file:/home/user/memex/daily/2016-12-05.org][2016-12-05.org]]
|