Amr Gharbeia
4e9431ec1d
passepartout v0.7.2 (Gate Trace + HITL + Search + 11 more features): - Gate trace visualization with Ctrl+G toggle - HITL inline panels with styled collapse on approve/deny - Agent identity file + /identity command - Safe-tool read-only allowlist - Message search mode with Up/Down nav and highlights - Context budget visibility with section breakdown - Session rewind /sessions /resume /rewind - Undo/redo per operation - Context debugging /context why /context dropped - Tool hardening (timeouts, write verify, read-only cache) - Tag stack severity tiers + trigger counts - Merkle provenance audit + audit-verify - Self-help /help <topic> reads USER_MANUAL.org - Live CONFIG section in system prompts - Pads: Page Up/Down scroll by 10 lines Core 92/92 TUI Main 104/104 TUI View 29/29 Neuro 13/13
125 lines
2.2 KiB
Org Mode
125 lines
2.2 KiB
Org Mode
#+TITLE: Interviews :academia:UoN:@personal:
|
|
#+FILETAGS: :atomic:note:
|
|
|
|
* Interviews :academia:UoN:@personal:
|
|
:PROPERTIES:
|
|
:CREATED: 350ec484-6376-4c89-b38b-b049b9982d9d
|
|
:SOURCE: /home/user/memex/daily/2017-05-22.org
|
|
:END:
|
|
|
|
:CREATED: [2017-05-22 Mon 09:42]
|
|
:MODIFIED: [2017-05-23 Tue 14:01]
|
|
:IMPORTED: [2023-02-08 Wed 19:22]
|
|
|
|
How I am going to present myself: I think I will present myself as an Earthship enthusiast trying to find an answer, and I am using academia as a vehicle to find an answer.
|
|
|
|
Feminist methodology: share your experience with them. For me, sharing is gaining trust
|
|
|
|
In the methods chapter: what informed the interview guide?
|
|
|
|
Homework
|
|
|
|
Read one of two papers with a focus on analysis
|
|
|
|
One A4 side: how has the world changed since your parents were your age?
|
|
|
|
Be prepared to share what you write tomorrow
|
|
|
|
Day 2
|
|
|
|
The key is the 'experience of' being a chased exile
|
|
|
|
having an RPF
|
|
|
|
about half an hour
|
|
|
|
2000 words report
|
|
|
|
Individual interview with someone you know, transcribe and analyse
|
|
|
|
Five elements:
|
|
|
|
1. Introduction, contextual background
|
|
|
|
2. Methods section - describing and justifying selection of
|
|
informations, access negotiation, data collection and justification for
|
|
the method of analysis.
|
|
|
|
3. Findings
|
|
|
|
4. Discussion of findings
|
|
|
|
5. Reflexivity: self-aware and self-critical reflection upon data
|
|
collection and analysis, including any ethical issues raised by the
|
|
study
|
|
|
|
Develop an interview guide
|
|
|
|
Include a copy of the consent form
|
|
|
|
deadline 14 June 3 pm
|
|
|
|
Student ID no name on it. Anonymise as possible
|
|
|
|
GNU nano 2.5.3 New Bdified
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
Methods: used psydonym
|
|
|
|
I approached
|
|
|
|
I clarifed
|
|
|
|
I gave information sheet
|
|
|
|
I explained I would record
|
|
|
|
I explained...
|
|
|
|
I thanked
|
|
|
|
I transcribed
|
|
|
|
Findings
|
|
|
|
I identified
|
|
|
|
Discussion
|
|
|
|
Quotes and analysis
|
|
|
|
Self critical reflection
|
|
|
|
Doubts
|
|
|
|
Influences
|
|
|
|
Knwoing the person for this execrice makes it more complex
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
Annex: Anonymised consent form
|
|
|
|
Paper 2
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
|
|
Methods: participant, data collection, data analysis
|
|
|
|
Findings
|
|
|
|
Discussion and critical reflection
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
|
|
Table: interview questions and prompts, in data collection
|
|
|
|
table: themes, in findings
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Backlinks
|
|
- Source: [[file:/home/user/memex/daily/2017-05-22.org][2017-05-22.org]]
|